38 lines (32 with data), 1.9 kB
Random thoughts on a decoration rewrite, probably largely conflicting
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
o All decoration styles currently possible should still be possible
o Simple styles should be simple to specify
- the decor vs. style distinction is confusing
o Accurate reproduction of looks&feels of other X WMs and non-X GUIs should
be possible
- pixel-level positioning of buttons required? or can this always be
simulated with appropriate pixmaps? Consider the different spacing
between the right three buttons in w95
- per-window settings/overrides need to be possible, even in a system where
window schemes are shared - motif maximize button, for instance
- wm2/wmx-style doesn't fit at all in the fvwm2 modle; it should be
allowed and generalized
o themes for other X WMs should be usable and/or simulatable
- best case, scheme-level support for parsing the configuration files
Sites of interest:
------------------
o http://www.themes.org/ and all the subsidiary sites, for examples of themes
for other WMs; note that most of these fit fairly well into an fvwm-ish
framework
o http://www.PLiG.org/xwinman/ for screenshots of various WMs;
http://www.PLiG.org/xwinman/screenshots/wm2-default.gif in particular
for a nice look/feel that doesn't fit the fvwm-ish framework at all.
Not visible in this screenshot is the resize bar in the SE corner
(maybe that is WMX only) - a small triangular piece that actually overlays
the client window
o http://www.enlightenment.org/ - Enlightenment, a WM that is devoted to flash.
We should be able to be just as flashy for users who want it, hopefully
straight from their config files, without giving up the substance.
-- jtl, 6 November 1998. Additional thoughts and discussion very much
appreciated