oreka-user Mailing List for oreka

Hi folks,

I would like to ask if it is possible to record only specific users. This
is theoretically possible because orkaudio is aware of this information. Is
it possible to set the setting like this either in orkaudio or orktrack? I
was thinking about setting PcapFilter to specific a user or an ip, but this
would require a restart.

It is possible to set this feature using a database?

I want to do this because of legal metter.

Thanks.

Regards,

Efelin

Hello,

I am using the Windows version and have added TapeFileNaming to the
TapeProcessors list and added <TapeFileNaming> and <TapePathNaming> sections
to the config.xml file and the recordings are still being saved in the fault
path and file names.

For Windows, do I need to specify drive letter too like:

<TapePathNaming>c:\myrecordings</TapePathNaming>
<TapeFileNaming>nativecallid,_,localip,_,remoteip</TapeFilenaming>

Thanks for any help.

-Paul

Neal,

I've gotten Tomcat6 to work with Ubuntu 10.10.

Are you installing all the same versions listed in the directions or are you installing the latest and greatest? Example is libpcap. I think the latest is 1.1 but for Ubuntu they have 0.7.

I tried installing with the default versions that apt-get would want me to use but this failed. I then installed it with the versions listed in the Users Guide and I was able to get it to work for me. I followed the installation and troubleshooting sections to get it working.

That's how I got it to work.

Keith


-----Original Message-----
From: Neal Piche [mailto:phi...@gm...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 11:04 PM
To: oreka-user
Subject: [Oreka-user] compatability

ok I have installed 32-bit java and 32-bit tomcat6 on wine which is
using 32-bit libs to emulate windows xp, and I get the same ^$*&%^&
error! so a simple question (I hope) has anyone got the 1.2 version of
orktrack/orkweb running on tomcat6 or should I give up and go back to
5.5? Thanks

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Oreka-user mailing list
Ore...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oreka-user

This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.

ok I have installed 32-bit java and 32-bit tomcat6 on wine which is 
using 32-bit libs to emulate windows xp, and I get the same ^$*&%^& 
error! so a simple question (I hope) has anyone got the 1.2 version of 
orktrack/orkweb running on tomcat6 or should I give up and go back to 
5.5? Thanks

is CentOS really lightweight? I would have to run it in a VM, or is 
there an easier way, I can't afford more hardware and I've got the 
recording part compiled and working, all I need is to get 
orktrack/orkweb working, does anyone have any better ideas than running 
in a VM? if not where to get a major stripped down headless CentOS 
install cd? Thanks for all the info and help so far


On 05/09/2011 02:26 PM, David Backeberg wrote:
> Yes. I reinstalled with 32-bit CentOS cds, from scratch.
>
> As for 'what you read on the internet'...
>
> Pure Java is platform-agnostic. However, there is inevitably some 'helper code' involved which takes the well-intentioned platform-agnostic code and makes it useless on any platform for which the builders did not compile the helper-code for.
>
> This was a problem for Dell DRAC firefox plugin, for example, if you wanted to actually use the part of the Java 'cross-platform code' that let you share your local devices with your remote server. It only worked on Linux with 32-bit firefox, 32-bit Java, etc.
>
> Dell did later fix that problem.
> ________________________________________
> From: Neal Piche [phi...@gm...]
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 1:02 AM
> To: David Backeberg; oreka-user
> Subject: Re: [Oreka-user] getting a REAL error message
>
> did you change the version of tomcat as well when you went back to 32bit
> by any chance, from what I read on the internet java is in bytecode so
> it is neither 32bit or 64bit until it is compiled by the Just In Time
> compiler at runtime, so I don't see how 64bit os and java should make a
> difference.... also if anyone else has some ideas on this
>
> On 04/14/2011 01:39 PM, David Backeberg wrote:
>>> When it compiles, at least I assume it does since there are binary files ( I have eclipse in auto mode for debugging which I couldn't figure out) the files it gives me are not in the right places already is>there a way to have it generate a war file?
>> When I got stuck with this problem, I tried to build with Eclipse and failed. I was doing something wrong somewhere with a missing library and just moved on.
>>
>> I ended up reinstalling with 32-bit linux, and that made certain I wasn't going to run into this problem again.
>>
>> I should also point out that CentOS 32-bit works pretty well. I don't know whether there are any known issues with ubuntu.
>>
>>> Also if I did "switch to 32- bit" how far do I have to go? Just install 32- bit tomcat?
>> don't know the answer to either of those questions.
>>
>>> I have heard 64 bit java will run 32 bit code as well.
>> I heard that too, although it didn't work for you and it didn't work for me.
>>
>> I can tell you your earlier problem of having zero logs coming out was due to the program utterly failing to start even to the point to generate logging.

Yes. I reinstalled with 32-bit CentOS cds, from scratch.

As for 'what you read on the internet'...

Pure Java is platform-agnostic. However, there is inevitably some 'helper code' involved which takes the well-intentioned platform-agnostic code and makes it useless on any platform for which the builders did not compile the helper-code for.

This was a problem for Dell DRAC firefox plugin, for example, if you wanted to actually use the part of the Java 'cross-platform code' that let you share your local devices with your remote server. It only worked on Linux with 32-bit firefox, 32-bit Java, etc.

Dell did later fix that problem.
________________________________________
From: Neal Piche [phi...@gm...]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 1:02 AM
To: David Backeberg; oreka-user
Subject: Re: [Oreka-user] getting a REAL error message

did you change the version of tomcat as well when you went back to 32bit
by any chance, from what I read on the internet java is in bytecode so
it is neither 32bit or 64bit until it is compiled by the Just In Time
compiler at runtime, so I don't see how 64bit os and java should make a
difference.... also if anyone else has some ideas on this

On 04/14/2011 01:39 PM, David Backeberg wrote:
>> When it compiles, at least I assume it does since there are binary files ( I have eclipse in auto mode for debugging which I couldn't figure out) the files it gives me are not in the right places already is>there a way to have it generate a war file?
> When I got stuck with this problem, I tried to build with Eclipse and failed. I was doing something wrong somewhere with a missing library and just moved on.
>
> I ended up reinstalling with 32-bit linux, and that made certain I wasn't going to run into this problem again.
>
> I should also point out that CentOS 32-bit works pretty well. I don't know whether there are any known issues with ubuntu.
>
>> Also if I did "switch to 32- bit" how far do I have to go? Just install 32- bit tomcat?
> don't know the answer to either of those questions.
>
>> I have heard 64 bit java will run 32 bit code as well.
> I heard that too, although it didn't work for you and it didn't work for me.
>
> I can tell you your earlier problem of having zero logs coming out was due to the program utterly failing to start even to the point to generate logging.

did you change the version of tomcat as well when you went back to 32bit 
by any chance, from what I read on the internet java is in bytecode so 
it is neither 32bit or 64bit until it is compiled by the Just In Time 
compiler at runtime, so I don't see how 64bit os and java should make a 
difference.... also if anyone else has some ideas on this

On 04/14/2011 01:39 PM, David Backeberg wrote:
>> When it compiles, at least I assume it does since there are binary files ( I have eclipse in auto mode for debugging which I couldn't figure out) the files it gives me are not in the right places already is>there a way to have it generate a war file?
> When I got stuck with this problem, I tried to build with Eclipse and failed. I was doing something wrong somewhere with a missing library and just moved on.
>
> I ended up reinstalling with 32-bit linux, and that made certain I wasn't going to run into this problem again.
>
> I should also point out that CentOS 32-bit works pretty well. I don't know whether there are any known issues with ubuntu.
>
>> Also if I did "switch to 32- bit" how far do I have to go? Just install 32- bit tomcat?
> don't know the answer to either of those questions.
>
>> I have heard 64 bit java will run 32 bit code as well.
> I heard that too, although it didn't work for you and it didn't work for me.
>
> I can tell you your earlier problem of having zero logs coming out was due to the program utterly failing to start even to the point to generate logging.

Oreka supports separate channel recording or stereo recording.  However,
this feature requires pcmwav, ulaw or alaw as a storage format and does not
support gsm.

To set up stereo recording, please modify the config.xml file (in
/etc/orkaudio) by modifying/adding the following:

	<StorageAudioFormat>pcmwav</StorageAudioFormat>
    	<StereoRecording>true</StereoRecording>
	<TapeNumChannels>2</TapeNumChannels>

You can substitute pcmvav with ulaw or alaw.

You will need to restart the orkaudio service for this to take effect.

Henri

-----Original Message-----
From: Патрик Равальдини [mailto:pa...@sp...] 
Sent: 18 April 2011 08:15
To: ore...@li...; ore...@li...
Subject: [Oreka-devel] Can Oreka record stereo files?

Hi All...

It's usefull case, don't it?

To have pronunciation and IVR on different channels of record...



Patrick Ravaldini

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Oreka-devel mailing list
Ore...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oreka-devel