|
From: J. L. <mal...@gm...> - 2013-07-19 16:39:07
|
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Felipe Sateler <fsa...@gm...> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Stephen Sinclair <rad...@gm...> > wrote: > > - check that ABI is backward-compatible replacing the .so > > (should i add back the lo_server_recv_raw_stream symbol ?) > > I'd say no. Users of private interfaces get what they deserve when > that interface goes away. > Agreed, but maybe he meant add it back just for testing whether it broke anything to remove it or not. > There is some testing to be done between apps using 0.26 and 0.27. The > issues J. Liles reported look more of a protocol break rather than abi > break. > > Perhaps the testsuite can be enhanced to run different endpoints with > different versions of the library? > An excellent idea. I'm pretty sure I had no trace of 0.26 left at the time, but you never know... Protocol incompatibility would be more disasterous than an ABI change. |