Re: [liblo] recent fixes should be published, needs 64-bit testing

Hi Steve,

Passes every tests for git commit 3478c4c freshly cloned on my Mac running Moutain Lion 10.8.4.

Best,
Cam

On 23 juin 2013, at 20:02, Stephen Sinclair <rad...@gm...> wrote:

> Okay, both of these issues are not what I'm seeing on my laptop, *and*
> they are not what was reported on the LAD mailing list.  Looks like
> there are a few things to iron out here... I'll have to try to get
> access to an x86-64 machine because I can't replicate these problems.
> 
> thanks,
> Steve
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Simon Newton <li...@no...> wrote:
>> test_bidirectional_tcp seems to block forever on  Debian Wheezy x86_64:
>> 
>> ./test_bidirectional_tcp
>> 0xf33010.server fd: 3
>> 0xf33010.receiving1..
>> 0xf34720.sending thread
>> 0xf34720.message sent
>> 0xf34720.sending thread waiting
>> 0xf33010./test, from TCP::
>> 0xf33010.address fd: 0
>> 0xf33010.reply sent
>> 0xf33010.done receiving1
>> 0xf33010.receiving2..
>> 
>> It's stuck in a poll loop:
>> 
>> poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP}, {fd=6,
>> events=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP}], 2, 10000) = 0 (Timeout)
>> poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP}, {fd=6,
>> events=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP}], 2, 10000) = 0 (Timeout)
>> poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP}, {fd=6,
>> events=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP}], 2, 10000
>> 
>> 
>> Simon
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Stephen Sinclair <rad...@gm...> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> After my initial publication of 0.27, a couple of serious bugs in the
>>> TCP implementation were posted, which have now been fixed.
>>> 
>>> I think it's worth publishing a bug-fix release just for this, before
>>> 0.27 gets into any linux distributions.  However, there was also a
>>> complaint on the LAD mailing list about "make test" failing for
>>> someone on an x86-64 Suse Linux machine.
>>> 
>>> I don't know whether the recent fixes were related, so I'll contact
>>> the author and check with him whether it is now fixed.  However, can
>>> anyone confirm that "make test" is successful on an x86-64 machine?
>>> My laptop is 32-bit, so I don't currently have access to one.
>>> 
>>> (I will note that I had tested it on a 64-bit Mac prior to the
>>> release.. I thought there were no issues.)
>>> 
>>> Steve
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>> 
>>> Build for Windows Store.
>>> 
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> liblo-devel mailing list
>>> lib...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/liblo-devel
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>> 
>> Build for Windows Store.
>> 
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> liblo-devel mailing list
>> lib...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/liblo-devel
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
> 
> Build for Windows Store.
> 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> liblo-devel mailing list
> lib...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/liblo-devel