RE: [IPCop-devel] v1.3b3 - bandwidth control

FMJLB ?
FMJLD ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipc...@li... 
> [mailto:ipc...@li...] On Behalf Of 
> Arnt Karlsen
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 9:37 AM
> To: ipc...@li...
> Subject: Re: [IPCop-devel] v1.3b3 - bandwidth control
> 
> 
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 23:55:06 +1000, 
> "David Kilpatrick" <da...@da...> wrote in message 
> <000e01c2f78d$23bacf90$640...@rg...>:
> 
> > The traffic graphs faied to work because the system was 
> installed on a 
> > machine that thought it was April 2. Hence when I rolled 
> the date back 
> > to March 31 (using the ntpdate feature) .. ipac-2-mrtg started 
> > complaining the log files were from the future. This might 
> be one of 
> > the caevets of using the ntpdate function perhaps.
> 
> ..for ideas: 'touch --help' on ipcop, 'info touch' on a FMJLB.
> 
> ..FWIW, ipcop is _not_ a FMJLD, and an ipcop box is no FMJLB.  ;-)
> 
> -- 
> ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) 
> ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
>   Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
>   best case, worst case, and just in case.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
> No other company gives more support or power for your 
> dedicated server 
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020> aff/direct/01/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPCop-devel mailing list
> IPC...@li... 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/i> pcop-devel
>