2.The table elements should be visible not only for the whole workflow but for all the terminated job instances paid for.
3. A separate “accumulated” and a an separate “detailed” view is suggested for the presentation of costs in the case of terminated job instances belonging to a common job (case of parametric sweep jobs)
4. The actual size of the transferred input and output data belonging to the separate job instances can be presented ( via dividing measured storage costs by the storage unit costs) as well. This may be very useful for general debugging and for the cost estimations of further workflow submissions.