gatos-devel Mailing List for GATOS

Does the current km driver have mmap support?  Looks like Ken Healy might
be working on a new version of this.  Hope it supports Motion :)

Jan 24 21:01:17  kernel: Processing "VIDEO_STREAM_ACTIVE"="1"
int_value=1
Jan 24 21:01:17  kernel: Purging transfer queue
Jan 24 21:01:17  kernel: rage128_get_window_parameters: width=640
height=240
Jan 24 21:01:17  kernel: Capture buf size=307200
Jan 24 21:01:17  kernel: rage128_get_window_parameters: width=640
height=240
Jan 24 21:01:17  motion: ioctl (VIDIOCGCHAN): Invalid argument
Jan 24 21:01:17  motion: no mmap falling back on read
Jan 24 21:01:17  kernel: rage128_get_window_parameters: width=640
height=240
Jan 24 21:01:17  kernel: rage128_get_window_parameters: width=640
height=240
Jan 24 21:01:17  motion: V4L capturing using read is deprecated!!!!
Jan 24 21:01:17 motion: Send an email to xx...@am... if your device
does not support mmap
Jan 24 21:01:17  motion: Please also give the kernel and driver versions
Jan 24 21:01:17  kernel: km: closed stream, 0 buffers captured
Jan 24 21:01:17  kernel: Purging transfer queue

Jim

Hi Jindrich,

     There is an additional problem - AFAIK, ati.2 never supported
the combination of old mach64+addon properly. (Rage Pro+addon probably 
worked).

     Try using really old xatitv code and find out where the bug is. I 
never had any luck trying to debug it remotely (i.e.. someone else with 
the hardware running the test code).

     Everything seemed to indicate that the code is right and does what we 
think it is supposed to do, but i2c bus is non-functional.

     Perhaps there is an obvious bug that I overlooked.

                          best

                            Vladimir Dergachev

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Jindrich Kolorenc wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I have a HW setup as indicated in the subject and I cannot get Xvideo
> and/or TV working. I know the 264VT video card is very old, but it works
> (with TV) in windows. I have found the following post to this list (April
> 20, 2003) by Vladimir Dergachev:
>
>> I do not believe 264VT is Xvideo capable.
>>
>> I.e. these Mach 264VT adaptors do not have the hardware to support
>> overlay. (to be more precise there is some hardware, but it does not
>> support large images, both NTSC and DVD format images are too big for
>> it).
>>
>> Only starting with Mach64 264VTB the hardware overlay scaler supports
>> reasonable sizes.
>
>> However, it is not totally impossible that I made a mistake and 264VT has
>> a reasonably overlay scaler (I never tested it myself, just used
>> information in the docs). In this case, install XFree86 4.3.0 (from
>> source) and try recompiling ati.2 after modifying ati.2/atixv.c to allow
>> support for your adaptor (search for ATI_CHIP_264VTB).
>
> Well, the card has not enough capabilities to do overlays in DVD resolution,
> but (just) enough power to scale the TV signal comming from tuner card
> (obviously, because windows drivers/SW can use it). So, I am comming to
> my question: Is it possible to enable Xvideo for 264VT for TV to work?
> I tried to modify ati.2/atixv.c as suggested above with not much of success
> - xvinfo finds a video overlay, but that's all, no usable image with avview,
> mplayer, etc.
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> Jindrich Kolorenc
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> Gatos-devel mailing list
> Gat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel
>

> I have this card in my pc, and it's very weird because xv is detected,
> please see this URL http://195.55.55.164/tests/xv.txt ( it's the second
> screen, ATI Mach64 Back-end Overlay Scaler), but when I try to reproduce
> some video I always get a black screen, cpu is busy with decoding and
> the sound works as expected. I think that the driver lies about xv
> capabilities.

Interesting! What driver (and what version of X) do you actually use? I 
downloaded gatos from cvs yesterday, compiled against X 4.3.0 and got no 
xv capabilities detected.  

> Jindrich, you get some output of xvinfo?

As I said earlier, my output is either "no adaptor" or just anything if I 
modify the driver source. The problem is that I do not know specs of the 
card. Unfortunately, I do not know much of C either. However I was able to 
get scaling "working". To understand better what I mean: I have video 
window that can go fulscreen etc. The negative side of the thing is that 
the image inside is wrong - moving vertical lines or something like that. 
But: It is not just black and the lines are different for different mpegs.

The driver you have is maybe better start for experiments as it knows 
something more about the card. Well, it lies (a bit?), since

maximum XvImage size: 384 x 2048

is most probably wrong. The scaler in Mach64VT cannot do that much, it can 
scale something like 380x240. Maybe it is 384x240 (according to your 
xvinfo output). My version of gatos contains nothing small like this. So 
again, where comes your driver from?

Jindrich

Jindrich Kolorenc wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I have a HW setup as indicated in the subject and I cannot get Xvideo 
> and/or TV working. I know the 264VT video card is very old, but it works 
> (with TV) in windows. I have found the following post to this list (April 
> 20, 2003) by Vladimir Dergachev:
> 
> 
>>I do not believe 264VT is Xvideo capable.
>>
>>I.e. these Mach 264VT adaptors do not have the hardware to support
>>overlay. (to be more precise there is some hardware, but it does not
>>support large images, both NTSC and DVD format images are too big for
>>it).
>>
>>Only starting with Mach64 264VTB the hardware overlay scaler supports
>>reasonable sizes.
> 
> 
>>However, it is not totally impossible that I made a mistake and 264VT has
>>a reasonably overlay scaler (I never tested it myself, just used
>>information in the docs). In this case, install XFree86 4.3.0 (from
>>source) and try recompiling ati.2 after modifying ati.2/atixv.c to allow
>>support for your adaptor (search for ATI_CHIP_264VTB).

I have this card in my pc, and it's very weird because xv is detected,
please see this URL http://195.55.55.164/tests/xv.txt ( it's the second
screen, ATI Mach64 Back-end Overlay Scaler), but when I try to reproduce
some video I always get a black screen, cpu is busy with decoding and
the sound works as expected. I think that the driver lies about xv
capabilities.

Jindrich, you get some output of xvinfo?



> Well, the card has not enough capabilities to do overlays in DVD resolution,
> but (just) enough power to scale the TV signal comming from tuner card
> (obviously, because windows drivers/SW can use it). So, I am comming to
> my question: Is it possible to enable Xvideo for 264VT for TV to work?
> I tried to modify ati.2/atixv.c as suggested above with not much of success
> - xvinfo finds a video overlay, but that's all, no usable image with avview,
> mplayer, etc.
> 
> Thanks for any help.

> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel

On Friday 28 January 2005 01:38 pm, you wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:24:02 -0500, Bryan D. Stine <bat...@ge...>=
=20
wrote:
> Have you tried Xorg CVS at all?  I've got an AMD64 coming soon, and I
> hope things will go smoothly.  :)
I haven't actually. The most recent that I tried was 6.8.1.902 for testing,=
=20
which is actually the dlloader scenario I mentioned in my previous post.

> I have an ebuild that I'm using for Xorg CVS on my 32 bit system here,
> if it helps any..
>
> http://curtman.mine.nu/~curtis/xorg-cvs-ebuild.tar.bz2
> (MD5: f32d8c76fa86043c78aeed68fcfeb914 )

=2D-=20
Bryan D. Stine
bat...@ge...

Hello all,

I have a HW setup as indicated in the subject and I cannot get Xvideo 
and/or TV working. I know the 264VT video card is very old, but it works 
(with TV) in windows. I have found the following post to this list (April 
20, 2003) by Vladimir Dergachev:

> I do not believe 264VT is Xvideo capable.
> 
> I.e. these Mach 264VT adaptors do not have the hardware to support
> overlay. (to be more precise there is some hardware, but it does not
> support large images, both NTSC and DVD format images are too big for
> it).
> 
> Only starting with Mach64 264VTB the hardware overlay scaler supports
> reasonable sizes.

> However, it is not totally impossible that I made a mistake and 264VT has
> a reasonably overlay scaler (I never tested it myself, just used
> information in the docs). In this case, install XFree86 4.3.0 (from
> source) and try recompiling ati.2 after modifying ati.2/atixv.c to allow
> support for your adaptor (search for ATI_CHIP_264VTB).
 
Well, the card has not enough capabilities to do overlays in DVD resolution,
but (just) enough power to scale the TV signal comming from tuner card
(obviously, because windows drivers/SW can use it). So, I am comming to
my question: Is it possible to enable Xvideo for 264VT for TV to work?
I tried to modify ati.2/atixv.c as suggested above with not much of success
- xvinfo finds a video overlay, but that's all, no usable image with avview,
mplayer, etc.

Thanks for any help.

Jindrich Kolorenc

Hi
Do you know if the following is a common behaviour? If this is unusual 
maybe that's the reason of the problem with Federico's TVout that 
flickers on laptops with M7?

I am trying to set up the dual head (clone mode) for radeon 7500 laptop 
version (M7), standard FC3 distribution. My CRT isconnected to PAL TV 
(external VGA/CVBS converter). If I use the LCD only or CRT only or both 
but NOT in clone mode (separate Screens in ServerLayout in xorg.conf), 
then evrything works fine. The PAL data I use is:
HorizSync    15.625
VertRefresh  50.0
Modeline      "736x575i" 14.16 736 760 824 904 575 580 585 625 interlace 
-HSync -VSync

Now, the problem is when I want to use a clone mode (then only one 
Screen section). The config changes to:
    Option "MonitorLayout" "LVDS,CRT"
    Option "MergedFB" "true"
    Option "CloneMode" "736x575i"
    Option "CRT2Position" "Clone"
    Option "CRT2HSync" "15.625"
    Option "CRT2VRefresh" "50.0"
Modeline      "736x575i" 14.16 736 760 824 904 575 580 585 625 interlace 
-HSync -VSync

In this case LCD picture is fine but TV over CRT shows two (almost) 
identical pictures split by the horizontal black bar in the middle of 
the screen. I am pretty close to say that those two pictures comes from 
odd and even lines of one picture. The LCD is primary and it does not 
use an interlaced mode, CRT is secondary (clone) and its modeline says 
to use the interlacing. Thus it looks like the interlacing required by 
the modeline is omited somehow or not used properly if cooperates as 
cloned with non-interlaced primary display.

Do you have any ideas how to fix it? I am not sure if I can use 
non-interlaced mode for PAL tv.

Regards,
Przemek

Hi all

just upgraded my mandrake box to 10.1. In a repository I found xorg-x11
"6.8.2" (actually is 6.8.1.99); it already had gatos multimedia drivers
in the modules/multimedia directory, but didn't detect any peripheral on
the i2c bus (didn't even try to), so I tried to use Martin's 6.8.1
binaries instead (thank you, Martin).

Martin's binaries seem to work just fine, but I don't think I made a
nice choice by mixing versions; I'll try to keep this configuration
hoping it will show stable enough.

I'm wondering why during this transition there are no more updated
binaries available on the gatos sf page, as it was in the past for each
release of XFree86.

As binaries still are the shorter way to make our cards working (the
full xorg recompilation process requires much time, and the sources
available for the main distros are often patched), I'd suggest to write
some clear instructions on the gatos' homepage explaining which binary
is suited for which xorg release.

Thanks

Maurizio

Martin Bene wrote:

>Hi Fabio,
>
>  
>
>>>I've got an ATI Radeon 9200SE (AGP), and I haven't yet had 
>>>any problems;
>>>TV out works. If you'd like to give this a try I can put 
>>>these up on a
>>>webserver for you.
>>>      
>>>
>
>Ok, available for download now:
>
>http://mabene.icomedias.com/gatos-stuff/
>
>Hope this works for you,
>
>Martin
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
>Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
>http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Gatos-devel mailing list
>Gat...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel
>
>  
>

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:24:02 -0500, Bryan D. Stine <bat...@ge...> wrote:
> CVS ati.4.4.0 works for me, with Xorg on Gentoo. I've also got it building and
> running with xorg dlloader with minor patching.

Have you tried Xorg CVS at all?  I've got an AMD64 coming soon, and I
hope things will go smoothly.  :)

I have an ebuild that I'm using for Xorg CVS on my 32 bit system here,
if it helps any..

http://curtman.mine.nu/~curtis/xorg-cvs-ebuild.tar.bz2
(MD5: f32d8c76fa86043c78aeed68fcfeb914 )
-- 
Curtis Magyar
cu...@gm...

On Thursday 27 January 2005 07:05 am, Terry Shipclark wrote:
> Are the Gatos Drivers known to run in a 64 bit userland?? I will be
> running an amd 64 soon, and want to make sure
CVS ati.4.4.0 works for me, with Xorg on Gentoo. I've also got it building =
and=20
running with xorg dlloader with minor patching.
=2D-=20
Bryan D. Stine
bat...@ge...

Hi all

just upgraded my mandrake box to 10.1. In a repository I found xorg-x11 
"6.8.2" (actually is 6.8.1.99); it already had gatos multimedia drivers 
in the modules/multimedia directory, but didn't detect any peripheral on 
the i2c bus (didn't even try to), so I tried to use Martin's 6.8.1 
binaries instead (thank you, Martin).

Martin's binaries seem to work just fine, but I don't think I made a 
nice choice by mixing versions; I'll try to keep this configuration 
hoping it will show stable enough.

I'm wondering why during this transition there are no more updated 
binaries available on the gatos sf page, as it was in the past for each 
release of XFree86.

As binaries still are the shorter way to make our cards working (the 
full xorg recompilation process requires much time, and the sources 
available for the main distros are often patched), I'd suggest to write 
some clear instructions on the gatos' homepage explaining which binary 
is suited for which xorg release.

Thanks

Maurizio

Martin Bene wrote:

>Hi Fabio,
>
>  
>
>>>I've got an ATI Radeon 9200SE (AGP), and I haven't yet had 
>>>any problems;
>>>TV out works. If you'd like to give this a try I can put 
>>>these up on a
>>>webserver for you.
>>>      
>>>
>
>Ok, available for download now:
>
>http://mabene.icomedias.com/gatos-stuff/
>
>Hope this works for you,
>
>Martin
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
>Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
>http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Gatos-devel mailing list
>Gat...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel
>
>  
>

-- 
-------------------------------
Maurizio Avogadro di Cerrione
mailto:m.a...@fa...
-------------------------------

Are the Gatos Drivers known to run in a 64 bit userland?? I will be
running an amd 64 soon, and want to make sure

	Hi Folks,

I wonder if anyone else out there , has tried to use /dev/dhahelper for a
2.6 kernel. The reason I ask, is I am trying to play HDTV streams (mpegpes
codec, mplayer says), and its native resolution is 1920x1088 and hence I
could really do with some assistance with scaling the video.

	The pcHDTV folks say a 2G athlon (which I have its an XP2400 )
should be sufficient, but frame dropping isrequired to get this working at
any resolution. My card is a Radeon AIW 32MB (QD chip).

	Is dhahelper a substitute for DGA, or DRI in some way? I
understand it just sends data from user -> kernel space, but since I have
no idea wether this will help with decoding/scaling, I am wondering wether
or not to perservere and write a 2.6 driver.


	Some direction in these murky waters would be appreciated,
including wether a new card is required....;-)

	Regards

	PHiL

Finally, I've got my drivers work, but I don't know how. In my tests I 
tried to load X as usual user, and it didn't start. When I tried to do 
it as root, it started and after that started for user too. That's it, 
it works. I can attach log file, if somebody interested in it. BTW, when 
I load km drivers, after several seconds my box simultaneously reboots. 
Who discovered the similar behaviour and has some recepies?

Regards,

Yarema


>Quoting "Yarema (Yarchyk)" <ya...@ma...>:
>
>  
>
>>I tested drivers, making everything as you described on FC3  for Radeon7500
>>
>>01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW
>>[Radeon7500],
>>
>>but I've got only black display, mouse and keyboard became frozen and I
>>had to restart my comp with  backuped old drivers from x.org packet.
>>Does anybody have successful experience with a similar card and drivers?
>>    
>>
>
>With FC3, yes, but only after compiling Xorg for myself. It was also for a
>different card.
>
>  
>
>
>  
>

Quoting "Yarema (Yarchyk)" <ya...@ma...>:

> I tested drivers, making everything as you described on FC3  for Radeon7500
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW
> [Radeon7500],
>
> but I've got only black display, mouse and keyboard became frozen and I
> had to restart my comp with  backuped old drivers from x.org packet.
> Does anybody have successful experience with a similar card and drivers?

With FC3, yes, but only after compiling Xorg for myself. It was also for a
different card.

>
> Reagard,
> Yarema
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> Gatos-devel mailing list
> Gat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel
>

I tested drivers, making everything as you described on FC3  for Radeon7500

01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW 
[Radeon7500],

but I've got only black display, mouse and keyboard became frozen and I 
had to restart my comp with  backuped old drivers from x.org packet. 
Does anybody have successful experience with a similar card and drivers?

Reagard,
Yarema

Hi!
I have ATI Rage 128 AGP + ATI TV ISA Tuner.
So, I have my tuner working almost perfectly, except one thing. I can't adjust 
volume through AVView onscreen display.
As I understood, for my hardware there is no ability to adjust volume, as it's 
unsupported. But, in Windows TV Viever Program change line input gain, to 
adjust volume. So may be I can some how modify AVView script to adjust not an 
ALSA tuner volume, but just line-in volume?

Best regards, Dmitrij Afanasjev

My main goal is to have TV input and it works fine with xawtv.  I can't 
comment on 3-D, TV out, or any hardware acceleration.

Carmine

Yarema (Yarchyk) wrote:

> I meant how does your builted drivers work for you?
>

I meant how does your builted drivers work for you?

> FWIW,
>
> First off let me say that I let RHN update FC3, including X, to the 
> latest and greatest before building ati.4.4.0.
>
> I couldn't simply build ati.4.4.0 from CVS for FC3.  I had to do the 
> following.
>
Thanks for subsequent describing of your procedure. How does it work?


Yarema

Hello,

sorry, I just realized that my Radeon does not offer dual head support
at all. There is only one Monitor Connector. Sorry for bothering :-(

Greetings Ben

FWIW,

First off let me say that I let RHN update FC3, including X, to the
latest and greatest before building ati.4.4.0.

I couldn't simply build ati.4.4.0 from CVS for FC3.  I had to do the
following.

-----------------------------------
Get CVS branch of ati.4.4.0 from Sourceforge 

Download ati.4.4.0-xorg-6.8.patch

Make sure xorg-x11-sdk package is installed (rpm -q xorg-x11-sdk) 

Patch ati.4.4.0 
  Put patch file in the directory containing the "ati.4.4.0" directory
from CVS and run patch -p0 ati.4.4.0-xorg-6.8.patch 
  I had to manually input the filenames for each update in the patch
since the patch file uses ati.4.4.0.orig instead of ati.4.4.0. 

cd into ati.4.4.0 

Run " imake -I/usr/X11R6/lib/Server/config/cf -
I/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config -DTOPDIR=/usr/X11R6/lib/Server -DCURDIR=." 
  I couldn't simply use "xmkmf" like the README says because imake
couldn't find /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/host.def 

Edit fi1236.c to comment out definition of MT2032_shutdown(FI1236Ptr)
with "#if 0" ... "#endif" 
  I got the following error before editing fi1236.c:
    fi1236.c: At top level:
    fi1236.c:371: error: conflicting types for 'MT2032_dump_status'
    fi1236.c:170: error: previous implicit declaration of
'MT2032_dump_status' was here

Edit theatre.c to comment out call to DumpRageTheatreRegsByName(t); with
"#if 0" ... "#endif" 
  I got the following error before editing theatre.c:
    theatre.c: At top level:
    theatre.c:1949: error: conflicting types for
'DumpRageTheatreRegsByName'
    theatre.c:84: error: previous implicit declaration of
'DumpRageTheatreRegsByName' was here

Become root 

Run "make" 

Run "make install"


------------------------------------
Is it expected that the "xmkmf" command would not work in FC3 with the
Imakefile from CVS?
Should the CVS code be updated to fix the compile errors with fi1236.c
and theatre.c?

Carmine
PS. I can't wait for this stuff to be part of the official Xorg release!

Hello,

I would like to use my Radeon AIW (QD) for a dual head setup. Is this
possible with the gatos drivers? ATI seems to offer no support for cards
that old (come on its only 3 years).
I have already googled without finding an answer.

I appreciate all tips I can get regarding this issue, plese CC replies to my
address as I am not on the list.

Greetings Ben

-- 
Sparen beginnt mit GMX DSL: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

The docs are available through a NDA with ATI. At
least this was the situation half a year ago.

Regards,
Bogdan
--- Paul Miller <pa...@pi...> wrote:

> 
> Is it possible to obtain the datasheets for the
> RT200 and R300 chips?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Paul
> 
> On Friday 21 January 2005 7:52 pm, Brett Foster
> wrote:
> > Koen wrote:
> > >Where can i find bretts tool?
> >
> > One of the main switches here is having an end of
> life crisis so
> > there may be service interruptions.
> >
> > http://www.ioware.ca/~fosterb/radeonvip/
> >
> > If you need help with the software (because most
> problems right now
> > are probably my fault) please contact me directly.
> >
> > >On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 01:38:44 -0800 (PST), Bogdan
> Diaconescu
> > >
> > ><b_d...@ya...> wrote:
> > >>Instead of answering each question I thought I
> should
> > >>make list of steps for trying out audio setup:
> > >>
> > >>Prerequisites:
> > >>
> > >>- verify that your audio card line in is
> working.
> > >>- be sure the volume in avview is set to
> maximum.
> > >>- check that the audio mute in avview is
> unmuted.
> > >>- if you have, feed audio input to the external
> > >>connector of your ATI card.
> > >>
> > >>Modifying the drivers:
> > >>
> > >>- modify in
> radeon_video.c->RADEON_TDA9885_Init():
> > >>t->auto_mute_fm=0 instead of 1. This will make
> the
> > >>tuner output sound even there is no tuned chanel
> or
> > >>the tuner is not properly configured. Without
> this
> > >>change if the tuner is not properly set up it
> will
> > >>automatically mute. I suggest this especially
> for PAL
> > >>users.
> > >>
> > >>-In theatre200.c->RT_SetConnector() there is a
> case
> > >>for changind the connector between
> > >>tuner/composite/svideo:
> > >>
> > >>case (DEC_TUNER):   /* Tuner*/
> > >>    ....
> > >>    /* this is to set the analog mux used for
> sond */
> > >>    theatre_read(t, VIP_GPIO_CNTL, &data);
> > >>    data &= ~0x10;
> > >>    theatre_write(t, VIP_GPIO_CNTL, data);
> > >>
> > >>    theatre_read(t, VIP_GPIO_INOUT, &data);
> > >>    data &= ~0x10;
> > >>    theatre_write(t, VIP_GPIO_INOUT, data);
> > >>
> > >>case (DEC_COMPOSITE):   /* Comp*/
> > >>    ....
> > >>    /* this is to set the analog mux used for
> sond */
> > >>    theatre_read(t, VIP_GPIO_CNTL, &data);
> > >>    data |= 0x10;
> > >>    theatre_write(t, VIP_GPIO_CNTL, data);
> > >>
> > >>    theatre_read(t, VIP_GPIO_INOUT, &data);
> > >>    data |= 0x10;
> > >>    theatre_write(t, VIP_GPIO_INOUT, data);
> > >>
> > >>As you can see writing 1 in the 4th bit (0x10)
> > >>switches from composite to tuner audio. For your
> card
> > >>this may be different so you may try values like
> 0x1,
> > >>0x2, 0x4, 0x8, 0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80 or
> combinations
> > >>of these.
> > >>
> > >>Beware this is vendor/HW dependent so if it
> still does
> > >>not work you may want to use Brett's tool to
> determine
> > >>the values on windows. You also may have a
> different
> > >>audio chip than UDA1380HN sou you have to
> visually
> > >>look at board to identify it.
> > >>
> > >>- Send the portion of log file showing UDA1380
> and
> > >>VIP_GPIO_CNTL and VIP_GPIO_INOUT readouts.
> > >>
> > >>Regards,
> > >>Bogdan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>__________________________________
> > >>Do you Yahoo!?
> > >>Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty
> viruses.
> > >>http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
> > >>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the
> post-holiday blues
> > >>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net
> t-shirt from
> > >> ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well,
> > >> almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >>Gatos-devel mailing list
> > >>Gat...@li...
> >
>
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel
> > >
> >
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
> > >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW --
> Interactive
> > > Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create
> drag-&-drop
> > > reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports
> on the web.
> > > Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE
> copy at
> > > http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >Gatos-devel mailing list
> > >Gat...@li...
> >
>
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel
> >
> >
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW --
> Interactive
> > Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create
> drag-&-drop
> > reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on
> the web. Export
> > to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at
> > http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gatos-devel mailing list
> > Gat...@li...
> >
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel
> 
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW --
> Interactive Reporting
> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop
> reports. Save time
> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to
> DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at
> http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> Gatos-devel mailing list
> Gat...@li...
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Paul Miller wrote:

>Is it possible to obtain the datasheets for the RT200 and R300 chips?
>
>Thanks,
>-Paul
>  
>
As I understand it, that documentation is not available, but fortunately 
many components used on the card to support theater200 is documented. 
(Although there is a marketing datasheet which is almost utterly useless 
for the R200 IC.)