gatos-devel Mailing List for GATOS
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
volodya
Menu
▾
▴
gatos-devel — Technical discussions about GATOS drivers and applications
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(229) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(744) |
Feb
(481) |
Mar
(400) |
Apr
(309) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(266) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(434) |
Sep
(546) |
Oct
(392) |
Nov
(309) |
Dec
(350) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(318) |
Feb
(339) |
Mar
(436) |
Apr
(269) |
May
(326) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(332) |
Aug
(131) |
Sep
(126) |
Oct
(216) |
Nov
(140) |
Dec
(167) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(367) |
Feb
(141) |
Mar
(77) |
Apr
(85) |
May
(100) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(87) |
Sep
(96) |
Oct
(185) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(112) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(156) |
Feb
(60) |
Mar
(35) |
Apr
(57) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(49) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(60) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(35) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(7) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(2) |
|
2
(3) |
3
(7) |
4
(5) |
5
(11) |
6
(9) |
7
(5) |
8
(3) |
|
9
(8) |
10
(2) |
11
|
12
|
13
(1) |
14
(1) |
15
(4) |
|
16
(3) |
17
(7) |
18
(5) |
19
(3) |
20
(4) |
21
(3) |
22
|
|
23
(5) |
24
(1) |
25
|
26
|
27
(2) |
28
(3) |
29
|
|
30
(2) |
31
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Hans D. <han...@we...> - 2004-05-31 16:01:04
|
Hi! I'm using an AIW 7500 PCI and an 9800Pro AGP card at the same time, with two independent X servers running. The system is absolutly stable with ati.2 and fglrx 3.2.8 drivers (XFree86 4.3), kernel 2.6.5. I have 3d acceleration working on the 9800 pro, but I haven't been able to get it working on the 7500 since there doesn't seem to be any drm module in the 2.6.5 kernel which would want to work with the ati.2 drivers (no difference if I have fglrx loaded or not). I have also not been able to get either tv-watching nor video capture working on the 7500 (again, independent of if fglrx is loaded or not). km compiles and loads fine, but it doesn't work. I was debugging this for quite some time with the help of Vladimir Dergachev, but due to my current workload I had to abondon the debugging for the timebeeing. TV-out on the other hand works fine on the 7500, so I'm actually quite happy at the moment.. Would like to get the tv-capture workin tough.. I have no stability problems whatsoever. If you are using a newer version of fglrx, you might want to downgrade to 3.2.8. 3.7.0 and 3.7.6 are unstable and really crappy. Regads, Hans On Sunday 30 May 2004 23:38, Frederic Howell wrote: > On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 09:32, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > > Bogdan Diaconescu has ported ati.2 code to XFree86 4.4.0 ! > > Thank you, Mr. Diaconescu. > > > The result is in a new module, named "ati.4.4.0" - hopefully this would > > be less confusing. > > > > Notes: > > > > a) Mach64 code has *NOT* been ported, however, stock 4.4.0 drivers > > contain PutImage-only code (i.e. DVD/movie playback) ported by > > Marc Aurele (maintainer of XFree86 ati driver). > > xatitv 0.0.5-CVS-200001025 seems to work for me. Using it with the 4.4 > ati driver. Capture worked with km-0.2.1 as well if capture mode is set > to Double(alt). Of course the overlay is screwed. (haven't tried the > atiedit 1 4 0 trick, yet, see below) And I think I'm getting pixmap > corruption. Maybe I need to add the VideoRam parameter? > > It is running in the same box as a Radeon 9600 (using stock 4,4 driver), > and the overlay still works there. Any combination I tried with XF4.3 > ati.2+Mach64 and fglrx+Radeon was unstable - very unstable. Anybody > have success stories for such a combination? It is fault of fglrx I'm > sure, just no open-source driver for 4.3 for Radeon 9600, right? > > > Fred > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Gatos-devel mailing list > Gat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel |
|
From: Frederic H. <fo...@sh...> - 2004-05-30 20:39:14
|
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 09:32, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > Bogdan Diaconescu has ported ati.2 code to XFree86 4.4.0 ! > Thank you, Mr. Diaconescu. > The result is in a new module, named "ati.4.4.0" - hopefully this would > be less confusing. > > Notes: > > a) Mach64 code has *NOT* been ported, however, stock 4.4.0 drivers > contain PutImage-only code (i.e. DVD/movie playback) ported by > Marc Aurele (maintainer of XFree86 ati driver). > xatitv 0.0.5-CVS-200001025 seems to work for me. Using it with the 4.4 ati driver. Capture worked with km-0.2.1 as well if capture mode is set to Double(alt). Of course the overlay is screwed. (haven't tried the atiedit 1 4 0 trick, yet, see below) And I think I'm getting pixmap corruption. Maybe I need to add the VideoRam parameter? It is running in the same box as a Radeon 9600 (using stock 4,4 driver), and the overlay still works there. Any combination I tried with XF4.3 ati.2+Mach64 and fglrx+Radeon was unstable - very unstable. Anybody have success stories for such a combination? It is fault of fglrx I'm sure, just no open-source driver for 4.3 for Radeon 9600, right? Fred |
|
From: Lee P. <le...@ya...> - 2004-05-30 15:45:20
|
Vladimir: What make switches are required when making ATI.4.4.0 for XFree86 4.4 are required. I also have a AIW7500 and want to compile the cvs driver and install. I have AthlonXP CPU, AIW7500 AGP. I want to get TV with avview working at a minimum. make -f Imakefile ????? Regards, Lee --- Vladimir Dergachev <vo...@mi...> wrote: > > Bogdan Diaconescu has ported ati.2 code to XFree86 > 4.4.0 ! > > The result is in a new module, named "ati.4.4.0" - > hopefully this would > be less confusing. > > Notes: > > a) Mach64 code has *NOT* been ported, however, > stock 4.4.0 drivers > contain PutImage-only code (i.e. DVD/movie > playback) ported by > Marc Aurele (maintainer of XFree86 ati > driver). > > b) I have verified that new code works on > Radeon 7500 - both PutImage > and PutVideo. > > c) There is a bug someplace in 3d part of the > driver - Xserver will > crash when glxinfo is run. Therefore, the > latest version of > Avview from CVS is recommended. > Alternatively, run bzip2 on > glxinfo executable to prevent Avview from > running it. > > d) As past year shows, I do not have time to > maintain GATOS code > regularly. I want to apologize for that - > in particular, for the > fact that I could not make 4.4.0 update > timely. > > best > > Vladimir Dergachev > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the > market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the > exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Gatos-devel mailing list > Gat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel ===== -- Lee Parmeter Linux Registered User #337161 http://www.linXos.com 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His government a democracy! - Lee Parmeter __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ |
|
From: Vladimir D. <vo...@mi...> - 2004-05-28 06:42:18
|
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Peter Osterlund wrote: > Vladimir Dergachev <vo...@mi...> writes: > >> On Wed, 26 May 2004, Carmine Greco wrote: >> >>> After my last posting I downloaded Xorg's source and the ati.4.4.0 >>> source. The ati.4.4.0 driver compiled and installed fine after a few >>> changes (e.g. include directories and binary locations). However, FC2's >>> tvtime still doesn't see the ATI AIW Radeon TV tuner. Then I remembered >>> about the km and drm-kernel modules for V4L support. >> >> What is tvtime ? If it is one of the apps that uses v4l interface, >> than it will not work with ati.4.4.0. > > That seems to be the case. See: > > http://tvtime.sourceforge.net/problems.html#aiw > > Among other things, it says: > > The Video4Linux interface provided by GATOS is currently > unusable with tvtime, and at this point it seems unlikely that > they ever will. The problems are: > > 1. The rumor is that the All-In-Wonder cards cannot both > capture and allow an application to use the hardware > overlay scaler of the card. If this is true, then tvtime > would be unable to do any processing on the video. > > Is this rumor true? It is not a hardware limitation, rather a limitation of the current driver. The driver is currently written so that you can display incoming video stream using overlay scaler. And, if you want, you can capture this stream using km. From the description, tvtime wants to capture the stream first, apply some operations to it and then use overlay scaler for display - this won't work right now as the driver is using overlay scaler to display captured stream as is. It is not too hard to remove this limitation from the driver, however, tvtime would still need to use Xv interface as primary means of control, not v4l. best Vladimir Dergachev > > -- > Peter Osterlund - pe...@te... > http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340 > |
|
From: Peter O. <pe...@te...> - 2004-05-28 06:01:34
|
Vladimir Dergachev <vo...@mi...> writes:
> On Wed, 26 May 2004, Carmine Greco wrote:
>
> > After my last posting I downloaded Xorg's source and the ati.4.4.0
> > source. The ati.4.4.0 driver compiled and installed fine after a few
> > changes (e.g. include directories and binary locations). However, FC2's
> > tvtime still doesn't see the ATI AIW Radeon TV tuner. Then I remembered
> > about the km and drm-kernel modules for V4L support.
>
> What is tvtime ? If it is one of the apps that uses v4l interface,
> than it will not work with ati.4.4.0.
That seems to be the case. See:
http://tvtime.sourceforge.net/problems.html#aiw
Among other things, it says:
The Video4Linux interface provided by GATOS is currently
unusable with tvtime, and at this point it seems unlikely that
they ever will. The problems are:
1. The rumor is that the All-In-Wonder cards cannot both
capture and allow an application to use the hardware
overlay scaler of the card. If this is true, then tvtime
would be unable to do any processing on the video.
Is this rumor true?
--
Peter Osterlund - pe...@te...
http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340
|
|
From: Vladimir D. <vo...@mi...> - 2004-05-28 01:57:53
|
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Carmine Greco wrote:
> After my last posting I downloaded Xorg's source and the ati.4.4.0
> source. The ati.4.4.0 driver compiled and installed fine after a few
> changes (e.g. include directories and binary locations). However, FC2's
> tvtime still doesn't see the ATI AIW Radeon TV tuner. Then I remembered
> about the km and drm-kernel modules for V4L support.
What is tvtime ? If it is one of the apps that uses v4l interface, than it
will not work with ati.4.4.0. Try using AVview instead.
best
Vladimir Dergachev
>
> I got the km code from CVS and tried to compile it but ran into tons of
> errors. I copied km/Makefile-2.6 to Makefile and ran the suggested make
> command. Here's the beginning of the output:
>
> # make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6.5-1.358 SUBDIRS=$PWD modules
> make: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.5-1.358'
> CC [M] /tmp/gatos2/km/km_api.o
> In file included from include/linux/preempt.h:10,
> from include/linux/spinlock.h:9,
> from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
> from include/linux/gfp.h:4,
> from include/linux/slab.h:15,
> from include/linux/proc_fs.h:5,
> from /tmp/gatos2/km/km_api.c:19:
> include/linux/linkage.h:5:25: asm/linkage.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from include/linux/thread_info.h:20,
> from include/linux/spinlock.h:12,
> from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
> from include/linux/gfp.h:4,
> from include/linux/slab.h:15,
> from include/linux/proc_fs.h:5,
> from /tmp/gatos2/km/km_api.c:19:
> include/linux/bitops.h:3:23: asm/types.h: No such file or directory
> include/linux/bitops.h:4:24: asm/bitops.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from include/linux/thread_info.h:20,
> from include/linux/spinlock.h:12,
> from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
> from include/linux/gfp.h:4,
> from include/linux/slab.h:15,
> from include/linux/proc_fs.h:5,
> from /tmp/gatos2/km/km_api.c:19:
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> TIA
> Carmine
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Gatos-devel mailing list
> Gat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel
>
|
|
From: <aln...@co...> - 2004-05-27 19:05:08
|
On Thursday 27 May 2004 04:08, Carmine Greco wrote: > After my last posting I downloaded Xorg's source and the ati.4.4.0 > source. The ati.4.4.0 driver compiled and installed fine after a few > changes (e.g. include directories and binary locations). However, FC2's > tvtime still doesn't see the ATI AIW Radeon TV tuner. Then I remembered > about the km and drm-kernel modules for V4L support. > > I got the km code from CVS and tried to compile it but ran into tons of > errors. I copied km/Makefile-2.6 to Makefile and ran the suggested make > command. Here's the beginning of the output: > > # make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6.5-1.358 SUBDIRS=$PWD modules > make: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.5-1.358' > CC [M] /tmp/gatos2/km/km_api.o > In file included from include/linux/preempt.h:10, > from include/linux/spinlock.h:9, > from include/linux/mmzone.h:8, > from include/linux/gfp.h:4, > from include/linux/slab.h:15, > from include/linux/proc_fs.h:5, > from /tmp/gatos2/km/km_api.c:19: > include/linux/linkage.h:5:25: asm/linkage.h: No such file or directory > In file included from include/linux/thread_info.h:20, > from include/linux/spinlock.h:12, > from include/linux/mmzone.h:8, > from include/linux/gfp.h:4, > from include/linux/slab.h:15, > from include/linux/proc_fs.h:5, > from /tmp/gatos2/km/km_api.c:19: > include/linux/bitops.h:3:23: asm/types.h: No such file or directory > include/linux/bitops.h:4:24: asm/bitops.h: No such file or directory > In file included from include/linux/thread_info.h:20, > from include/linux/spinlock.h:12, > from include/linux/mmzone.h:8, > from include/linux/gfp.h:4, > from include/linux/slab.h:15, > from include/linux/proc_fs.h:5, > from /tmp/gatos2/km/km_api.c:19: > > Any suggestions? Hi when I compiled km it worked for me if I left off the SUBDIRS=$PWD modules so I just used #make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6.5-r1 since thats the kernel I'm ruunning under Gentoo > > TIA > Carmine > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Gatos-devel mailing list > Gat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel |
|
From: Carmine G. <cg...@nc...> - 2004-05-27 03:07:56
|
After my last posting I downloaded Xorg's source and the ati.4.4.0
source. The ati.4.4.0 driver compiled and installed fine after a few
changes (e.g. include directories and binary locations). However, FC2's
tvtime still doesn't see the ATI AIW Radeon TV tuner. Then I remembered
about the km and drm-kernel modules for V4L support.
I got the km code from CVS and tried to compile it but ran into tons of
errors. I copied km/Makefile-2.6 to Makefile and ran the suggested make
command. Here's the beginning of the output:
# make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6.5-1.358 SUBDIRS=$PWD modules
make: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.5-1.358'
CC [M] /tmp/gatos2/km/km_api.o
In file included from include/linux/preempt.h:10,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:9,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:4,
from include/linux/slab.h:15,
from include/linux/proc_fs.h:5,
from /tmp/gatos2/km/km_api.c:19:
include/linux/linkage.h:5:25: asm/linkage.h: No such file or directory
In file included from include/linux/thread_info.h:20,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:12,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:4,
from include/linux/slab.h:15,
from include/linux/proc_fs.h:5,
from /tmp/gatos2/km/km_api.c:19:
include/linux/bitops.h:3:23: asm/types.h: No such file or directory
include/linux/bitops.h:4:24: asm/bitops.h: No such file or directory
In file included from include/linux/thread_info.h:20,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:12,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:4,
from include/linux/slab.h:15,
from include/linux/proc_fs.h:5,
from /tmp/gatos2/km/km_api.c:19:
Any suggestions?
TIA
Carmine
|
|
From: Mr M <mus...@sb...> - 2004-05-24 12:52:12
|
I got capture working finally. I had to go back to kernel 2.6.5. Kernel 2.6.6 seems to break the drivers. Here is what I have done to get it working. - Gentoo system with ~x86 set in make.conf - XFree86 4.3.0 installed - Switched from DEVFS to UDEV. - Compiled km drivers from CVS against Linux kernel 2.6.5 - copied km_api_drv.ko and km_drv.ko to /lib/modules/2.6.5/misc - added km_api_drv and km_drv to /etd/modules.autoload/linux-2.6 - Avview compiled from CVS - ati.2 installed from binary tarball (not needed for capture) Thanks to all for the help and thanks to the developers for making these drivers. It is nice to be able to use all the features of the AIW card under Linux. --- "rac47.02" <rac...@en...> wrote: > Sorry. I didn't see your most recent post before > replying. > Since I haven't done capture yet, I can't help. I > will try > compiling km and see if I can capture. I'll update > if I > discover anything. It is reported to work, though. > > I am just figuring all this out too. It was a bit > confusing > initially, understanding the relationships between > km and v4l, > and between ati.2, drm_kernel, dri, and kernel drm. > I'm still > sorting this out, but I believe that km should work > for 2.6 > kernels, regardless of ati.2 and drm_kernel. I know > for sure > (did it) that ati.2 works (without drm and 3D > accel), although > my desktop looks funny (doesn't refresh properly, > leaving dots > or stripes when a window is minimized or closed). > > Stay posted. I'll try km and avview. I'll tell you > tomorrow. > > >===== Original Message From Mr M > <mus...@sb...> ===== > >Update: I installed udev and now my video devices > are > >being created automaticially. I still cannot > capture > >with avview. It is looking for /proc/km when it > >starts. Is this file suppose to be created when the > km > >modules are loaded into the kernel and does it only > >work with 2.4 kernels? Anyone been able to capture > >with km on a 2.6 kernel? > > > >--- Mr M <mus...@sb...> wrote: > >> > >> --- "rac47.02" <rac...@en...> > wrote: > >> > >===== Original Message From Mr M > >> > <mus...@sb...> ===== > >> > >kernel 2.6.6 with v4l as module > >> > >km compiled from CVS and modules installed > >> > >ATI.2 drivers installed with XFree86 4.3.0 > >> > >AVview compiled and installed from CVS > >> > > >> > Did you compile the kernel from source? > >> Yes . Kernel 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 > >> > Did you compile the CVS km using the build > >> > environment for linux-2.6.6? > >> Yes. Used the Makefile-2.6 with command at top of > >> file. > >> > Did you choose devfs option while configuring > the > >> > kernel? > >> Yes. > >> > Is devfsd running? > >> Yes. But not mounted at boot my kernel. > >> > > >> > devfs is deprecated, and only a limited version > is > >> > available > >> > in the kernel sources, for backwards > >> compatibility. > >> > > >> > Most likely, you need to download udev from: > >> > > >> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug/ > >> > > >> Yeah, I thought about trying udev to see if that > >> helps > >> since devfs is now obsolete. I am going to > install > >> udev and see. I am not sure if udev is stable yet > so > >> I > >> was reluctant to switch. Is udev now good enough > to > >> consider stable? > >> > If you need more help with this, ask. I just > did > >> it > >> > on my machine about a > >> > month ago. It was a bit involved, but not > >> difficult. > >> > It solved almost every > >> > kernel 2.6 problem I had. > >> > > >> Thanks. If I get stuck with udev I'll ask. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >------------------------------------------------------- > >> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > SourceForge.net > >> > Broadband > >> > Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get > the > >> > fastest > >> > 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the > >> first > >> > 3 months! > >> > > >> > >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Gatos-devel mailing list > >> > Gat...@li... > >> > > >> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel > >> > >> > >> > >> > >------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > SourceForge.net > >> Broadband > >> Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the > >> fastest > >> 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the > first > >> 3 months! > >> > >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Gatos-devel mailing list > >> Gat...@li... > >> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net > Broadband > >Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the > fastest > >6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first > 3 months! > >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click > >_______________________________________________ > >Gatos-devel mailing list > >Gat...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net > Broadband > Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the > fastest > 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first > 3 months! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Gatos-devel mailing list > Gat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel |
|
From: Vladimir D. <vo...@mi...> - 2004-05-23 22:33:03
|
On Sun, 23 May 2004, Lee Parmeter wrote: > Bryan you said: > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> Xorg is based on an XFree86 4.4rc CVS fork, so the >> binaries are incompatible. >> There are too many source differences between >> XFree86 4.4.0/Xorg and XFree86 >> 4.3.0 to compile the driver cleanly > > If Xorg is a fork on XFree86 4.4, why wouldn't the > recently ported 4.4 (apparently CVS only) version of > the ATI driver work? Actually, at this moment it should. Xorg code is not that far from=20 4.3.99.902 (i.e. 4.4.0rc2) which they started from. 4.4.0 driver is being developed against 4.3.99.902 actually.. > > Only a handful of developers have enough knowledge and > experience to attempt a port of the ATI2 drivers to an > alternate X11 interface. If there are no plans to > support Xorg, then I will just have to chuck my > AIW7500 and buy another 100% Video4Linux supported TV > card. Most distro's will be switching to Xorg so I > think that would be a fatal mistake for this project. Lee, you see, if you want to make sure something is supported the best way is to write the code (or test it, whatever applies)=20 yourself. Otherwise, you can hope that the statistic will work for you - if all distribution are indeed carrying Xorg then there is a good chance=20 that everyone (including people writing drivers) have it, don't you think ? The reality is that there are several *different* Xserver projects (at least Xouvert, X.org, XFree86, let's through DRI here too) that make=20 it impractical to support all of them. Personally, right now I am using XFree86 (which I am reasonably=20 comfortable with) and I am not going to switch (or invest time learning=20 structure of another project) until at least two of the following things=20 happen: * Slackware stops shipping XFree86 * DRI switches to something else. Note that there is movement within dri project to make it easy to ship standalone drivers (so that OEM can make binaries drivers to fit DRI infrastructure). This would likely make this whole issue irrelevant.. * X.org and/or Xouvert stabilize their internal changes - they have ambitious plans and the changes would be worth it - when they are complete. As far as Redhat is concerned, they have historically applied tons of=20 patches and I have never been interested in tracking their developement. Speaking of which, Redhat (or anyone else) is welcome to port parts of=20 ati.2 driver into whatever trees they want. The primary goal of GATOS was to research how ones uses AIW cards, with=20 the intention that its code is merged into larger projects later (which is= =20 why there are no ati.2 drivers besides "experimental" ones). Most of the code that deals with XvPutImage has already been merged=20 (mach64 - starting with 4.4.0 and rage128 and radeon starting with 4.1.0 and up to now (?)) So, this is my angle. Other developers have, of course, different=20 agendas and opinions :) best Vladimir Dergachev > > Regards, > Lee > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > -- > Lee Parmeter > Linux Registered User #337161 > http://www.linXos.com > 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison > God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His government a democracy! = - Lee Parmeter > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Domains =96 Claim yours for only $14.70/year > http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D3149&alloc_id=3D8166&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Gatos-devel mailing list > Gat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel > |
|
From: Bryan D. S. <bat...@ge...> - 2004-05-23 22:12:47
|
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I never said there were no plans. That's entirely up to Vladimir and commun= ity=20 effort. Personally, I don't have the required experience either, which is w= hy=20 I'm not a GATOS developer. Those who do have the skills necessary are=20 volunteers and probably have little time to work on this. As far as ATI's drivers, who knows? I don't work on those either. Xorg is=20 based on a forked XFree86 4.4 release candidate, not the 4.4.0 release. Asi= de=20 from licensing, there could be numerous differences that make ATI's drivers= =20 binary incompatible. On Sunday May 23, 2004 3:35 pm, Lee Parmeter wrote: > Bryan you said: > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > Xorg is based on an XFree86 4.4rc CVS fork, so the > > binaries are incompatible. > > There are too many source differences between > > XFree86 4.4.0/Xorg and XFree86 > > 4.3.0 to compile the driver cleanly > > If Xorg is a fork on XFree86 4.4, why wouldn't the > recently ported 4.4 (apparently CVS only) version of > the ATI driver work? > > Only a handful of developers have enough knowledge and > experience to attempt a port of the ATI2 drivers to an > alternate X11 interface. If there are no plans to > support Xorg, then I will just have to chuck my > AIW7500 and buy another 100% Video4Linux supported TV > card. Most distro's will be switching to Xorg so I > think that would be a fatal mistake for this project. > > Regards, > Lee > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > -- > Lee Parmeter > Linux Registered User #337161 > http://www.linXos.com > 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison > God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His government a democracy! - > Lee Parmeter > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Domains =96 Claim yours for only $14.70/year > http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D3149&alloc_id=3D8166&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Gatos-devel mailing list > Gat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel =2D --=20 Bryan D. Stine <bat...@ge...> "So.. humans have easily injured knees. My race will find this information very useful indeed. Mwahwahahahaha!" --Morbo =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAsSJFfOANI+KyU0sRAs7dAJ9fwemtV0fITrWUXvlwIwpgDKKhFwCeMvCH MoxsmSOfgVPhOUIgxKO3Y2o=3D =3DVYdT =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Lee P. <le...@ya...> - 2004-05-23 19:35:57
|
Bryan you said: ============== > Xorg is based on an XFree86 4.4rc CVS fork, so the > binaries are incompatible. > There are too many source differences between > XFree86 4.4.0/Xorg and XFree86 > 4.3.0 to compile the driver cleanly If Xorg is a fork on XFree86 4.4, why wouldn't the recently ported 4.4 (apparently CVS only) version of the ATI driver work? Only a handful of developers have enough knowledge and experience to attempt a port of the ATI2 drivers to an alternate X11 interface. If there are no plans to support Xorg, then I will just have to chuck my AIW7500 and buy another 100% Video4Linux supported TV card. Most distro's will be switching to Xorg so I think that would be a fatal mistake for this project. Regards, Lee ===== -- Lee Parmeter Linux Registered User #337161 http://www.linXos.com 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His government a democracy! - Lee Parmeter __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer |
|
From: Bryan D. S. <bat...@ge...> - 2004-05-23 04:35:26
|
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Xorg is based on an XFree86 4.4rc CVS fork, so the binaries are incompatibl= e.=20 There are too many source differences between XFree86 4.4.0/Xorg and XFree8= 6=20 4.3.0 to compile the driver cleanly, so you'll need to either find a patch = to=20 update GATOS or port it up yourself. On Saturday May 22, 2004 10:29 pm, Carmine Greco wrote: > I have an ATI AIW Radeon 32 which I have been using with RH9 and an > ati.2 driver for some time now. I'm testing out Fedora Core 2 and my > card is detected as a 7200, and it does not appear that the TV tuner is > recognized and/or configured. I know FC2 uses Xorg's server instead of > XFree86. Any advice on how to use the TV tuner in my card with FC2? > TIA > > Carmine > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D3149&alloc_id=3D8166&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Gatos-devel mailing list > Gat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel =2D --=20 Bryan D. Stine <bat...@ge...> "So.. humans have easily injured knees. My race will find this information very useful indeed. Mwahwahahahaha!" --Morbo =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAsCpxfOANI+KyU0sRArSnAKCIMa6NDyCWKUTfcdctDgvllcXHVgCgqx4x IxTIxuhI9nVn6JgH5kZH9Ik=3D =3DMPJQ =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Carmine G. <cg...@nc...> - 2004-05-23 02:29:10
|
I have an ATI AIW Radeon 32 which I have been using with RH9 and an ati.2 driver for some time now. I'm testing out Fedora Core 2 and my card is detected as a 7200, and it does not appear that the TV tuner is recognized and/or configured. I know FC2 uses Xorg's server instead of XFree86. Any advice on how to use the TV tuner in my card with FC2? TIA Carmine |
|
From: Ken B. <kb...@1i...> - 2004-05-21 12:29:57
|
Recompiled the driver. it makes no difference AFA the sound goes. It's very
weird that I get sound on a couple of channels and not at all on the others.
> On Wednesday 07 April 2004 10:05 am, you wrote:
> When I disable radeon.o, starting AVview causes X to shutdown.
This should not affect AVview, really. It should certainly not cause X to
crash. Try reinstalling the driver.
best
Vladimir Dergachev
>> What happens if you disable DRM module ? (run bzip2 on it).
>>
>> best
>>
>> Vladimir Dergachev
>>
>> On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Ken Brandt wrote:
>>> I am using Mand. 9.2. I have an ATI 8500DV and a creative Audigy2
>>> Platinum. I've had Avview working with sound since I installed Mandrake
>>> but I could not get 3d accel working. after alot of playing around
>>> (updating X and gatos drivers, recompiling the kernel etc)I finally got
>>> everything working. Now however AVview only has sound on channels 5 &6
>>> and the sound for channel 19 is on 20 but all the rest have no sound. Any
>>> Ideas as to why this would be? as I said it worked before I updated. and
>>> it all still works in windows ( I still dual boot (but not for much
>>> longer!!! :) ))
>>>
>>> Thanks for the help.
>>> Ken
>>>
>>>
|
|
From: Nikolai Z. <s0...@ho...> - 2004-05-21 08:51:45
|
Hi Mauricio, Friday, 21 May, 2004, 6:26:21, you wrote: > I don't want to capture video, so I only need the "km_api_drv" module and No you don't need any of them if you don't use capture. > xawtv load the module automatically when I run the program, but the > "km_api_drv" realy act as a V4L device??? becouse it seems like the xawtv km_api_drv is only used by kmm_drv > program open some "Xvideo" device and if I do: > $ xawtv -device /dev/video0 > //don't work at all and... Right, it can't work this way. > $ xawtv -device /dev/Xvideo > //neither > ???? XVideo is not a linux device, it is an X server extension. > only work > $ xawtv > So, where is the v4l compatibility?? all v4l softwares work with some > /dev/video* device, what is my mistake??, can I realy wotk with the ATI AIW > as a v4l device?? No. AIW is mainly controlled through XV interface instead. > I try to put the "alias /dev/video0 km_drv" in my modules.conf, but I have > the same problem. The alias is not a solution for any real problem, it is just a way to get "modprobe km_drv" executed automatically at right time. > Any advice?? Don't forget to CC to gatos-devel so other people could advice you something even better :) -- Best regards, Nikolai Zhubr > Thanks > Mauricio. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nikolai Zhubr" <s0...@ho...> > To: "Mauricio Henriquez" <bu...@en...> > Cc: <gat...@li...> > Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 6:27 PM > Subject: Re: [GATOS]km error with AIW Classic (Mach64) >> Hi, >> Thursday, 20 May, 2004, 18:56:52, Mauricio Henriquez wrote: >> [...] >> > modprobe videodev || true >> > ** Now loading km modules >> > insmod ./km_api_drv.o >> > insmod ./km_drv.o km_debug=0 km_buffers=5 >> > ./km_drv.o: init_module: Operation not permitted >> > Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, > including >> > invalid IO or IRQ parameters. >> > You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg >> > make: *** [test] Error 1 >> >> You should use dmesg (or open /var/log/messages with your favourite >> text viewer) to get some more detailed error description. Perhaps >> you need to tell your bios to assign some IRQ to videocard. >> >> > Anyway, if I do a "lsmod" I see the "videodev" and "km_api_drv" modules >> > loaded and if I run "xawtv" the card work fine (I can see the channels, >> > etc). What is that error??, What do the "km_drv.o"??, it can fail me >> >> km is needed for video capture, not for watching tv. >> >> > something without this module??, How can I fix that message?? >> >> Find out what causes it, see above. >> >> > and finally how can I do to load correctly the "km" modules when linux > start >> > (after X)?? >> >> Copy km_api_drv.o and km_drv.o to /lib/modules/<you kernel>/misc, >> run "depmod -a". >> If you want it loaded at linux startup (i.e. before X) you can >> manually insert "modprobe km_drv" into your /etc/rc.d/rc.local >> Normally however, there is no much point for that because km is >> only needed when /dev/video* is accessed. On 2.4.xx kernels I'd >> suggest to add "alias char_major_81 km_drv" to your >> /etc/modules.conf file, maybe "alias /dev/video0 km_drv" is >> allowed too. >> -- >> Best regards, >> Nikolai Zhubr >> >> > Tips???, links??, suggestions??, black magic??, pray's?? >> >> >> >> > Thanks >> >> >> >> > Mauricio Henriquez. >> >> >> >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------- >> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g >> > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. >> > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. >> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Gatos-devel mailing list >> > Gat...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g >> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. >> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Gatos-devel mailing list >> Gat...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel >> |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@st...> - 2004-05-21 06:17:34
|
Am Donnerstag 20 Mai 2004 16:36 schrieb Miroslaw Czachor: > Hi, last time I have upgraded kernel from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 and > I have problem with km (cvs version from 20.05.2004). > Compilation seems OK but I have warning messages: > > ... > LD [M] /root/km/km_drv.o > LD [M] /root/km/km_api_drv.o > Building modules, stage 2. > MODPOST > *** Warning: "video_register_device" [/root/km/km_drv.ko] undefined! > *** Warning: "video_unregister_device" [/root/km/km_drv.ko] undefined! > *** Warning: "video_devdata" [/root/km/km_drv.ko] undefined! These are symbols defined in the videodev kernel module (at least in Linux 2.4). It needs to be loaded before km_drv. 'depmod -ae' creates a dependency file for all modules. Then 'modprobe x' will load modules x depends on, too. > CC /root/km/km_api_drv.mod.o > LD [M] /root/km/km_api_drv.ko > CC /root/km/km_drv.mod.o > LD [M] /root/km/km_drv.ko > make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.6 > ... > > and km doesn't work (videodev, km_api_drv and km_drv load property but > /dev/video0 doesn't create and avview raport: 'no KM driver' ) > With 2.5.6 (same .config) kernel I haven't any warning messages > and everything works OK. > > Greetings and thank's > > Miroslaw Czachor > Yours, Stefan Fiedler > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Gatos-devel mailing list > Gat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel |
|
From: Nikolai Z. <s0...@ho...> - 2004-05-20 22:50:49
|
Hi, Thursday, 20 May, 2004, 18:56:52, Mauricio Henriquez wrote: [...] > modprobe videodev || true > ** Now loading km modules > insmod ./km_api_drv.o > insmod ./km_drv.o km_debug=0 km_buffers=5 > ./km_drv.o: init_module: Operation not permitted > Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including > invalid IO or IRQ parameters. > You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg > make: *** [test] Error 1 You should use dmesg (or open /var/log/messages with your favourite text viewer) to get some more detailed error description. Perhaps you need to tell your bios to assign some IRQ to videocard. > Anyway, if I do a "lsmod" I see the "videodev" and "km_api_drv" modules > loaded and if I run "xawtv" the card work fine (I can see the channels, > etc). What is that error??, What do the "km_drv.o"??, it can fail me km is needed for video capture, not for watching tv. > something without this module??, How can I fix that message?? Find out what causes it, see above. > and finally how can I do to load correctly the "km" modules when linux start > (after X)?? Copy km_api_drv.o and km_drv.o to /lib/modules/<you kernel>/misc, run "depmod -a". If you want it loaded at linux startup (i.e. before X) you can manually insert "modprobe km_drv" into your /etc/rc.d/rc.local Normally however, there is no much point for that because km is only needed when /dev/video* is accessed. On 2.4.xx kernels I'd suggest to add "alias char_major_81 km_drv" to your /etc/modules.conf file, maybe "alias /dev/video0 km_drv" is allowed too. -- Best regards, Nikolai Zhubr > Tips???, links??, suggestions??, black magic??, pray's?? > Thanks > Mauricio Henriquez. > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Gatos-devel mailing list > Gat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel |
|
From: Vladimir D. <vo...@mi...> - 2004-05-20 16:32:11
|
Bogdan Diaconescu has ported ati.2 code to XFree86 4.4.0 !
The result is in a new module, named "ati.4.4.0" - hopefully this would
be less confusing.
Notes:
a) Mach64 code has *NOT* been ported, however, stock 4.4.0 drivers
contain PutImage-only code (i.e. DVD/movie playback) ported by
Marc Aurele (maintainer of XFree86 ati driver).
b) I have verified that new code works on Radeon 7500 - both PutImage
and PutVideo.
c) There is a bug someplace in 3d part of the driver - Xserver will
crash when glxinfo is run. Therefore, the latest version of
Avview from CVS is recommended. Alternatively, run bzip2 on
glxinfo executable to prevent Avview from running it.
d) As past year shows, I do not have time to maintain GATOS code
regularly. I want to apologize for that - in particular, for the
fact that I could not make 4.4.0 update timely.
best
Vladimir Dergachev
|
|
From: Mauricio H. <bu...@en...> - 2004-05-20 14:57:13
|
Hi:
I have a Fedora Core1 Yarrow witth a old ATI AIW classic, linux tell me
that is a ATI Mach64. I install the Gatos-ATI-Driver and now I try to
install the "km" modules, I run the "make" command without problems, but
when I run "make test" I have the following error message:
make test
** Syncing disks
sync
** Trying to make sure v4l module is loaded
modprobe videodev || true
** Now loading km modules
insmod ./km_api_drv.o
insmod ./km_drv.o km_debug=0 km_buffers=5
./km_drv.o: init_module: Operation not permitted
Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including
invalid IO or IRQ parameters.
You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg
make: *** [test] Error 1
Anyway, if I do a "lsmod" I see the "videodev" and "km_api_drv" modules
loaded and if I run "xawtv" the card work fine (I can see the channels,
etc). What is that error??, What do the "km_drv.o"??, it can fail me
something without this module??, How can I fix that message??
and finally how can I do to load correctly the "km" modules when linux start
(after X)??
Tips???, links??, suggestions??, black magic??, pray's??
Thanks
Mauricio Henriquez.
|
|
From: Miroslaw C. <fo...@po...> - 2004-05-20 14:37:05
|
Hi, last time I have upgraded kernel from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6 and I have problem with km (cvs version from 20.05.2004). Compilation seems OK but I have warning messages: ... LD [M] /root/km/km_drv.o LD [M] /root/km/km_api_drv.o Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST *** Warning: "video_register_device" [/root/km/km_drv.ko] undefined! *** Warning: "video_unregister_device" [/root/km/km_drv.ko] undefined! *** Warning: "video_devdata" [/root/km/km_drv.ko] undefined! CC /root/km/km_api_drv.mod.o LD [M] /root/km/km_api_drv.ko CC /root/km/km_drv.mod.o LD [M] /root/km/km_drv.ko make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.6 ... and km doesn't work (videodev, km_api_drv and km_drv load property but /dev/video0 doesn't create and avview raport: 'no KM driver' ) With 2.5.6 (same .config) kernel I haven't any warning messages and everything works OK. Greetings and thank's Miroslaw Czachor |
|
From: Benjamin M. <ben...@gm...> - 2004-05-19 18:00:02
|
When will I ever learn not to press Ctrl+Enter to make a linebreak, then my messages will not leave to early (perhaps the feature will vanish when ICQ or whoever else will hold a patent on this and all other possibilities to send a message without circling your mouse trice around the sent button...). Sorry for the inconvenience. Here again. > PS Hmm.. Read that again and it sounds a bit grouchy. Sorry ! I am just > in a bad mood bc of software patents in Europe. I better not rewrite this > e-mail though or it'll sound worse. Hmm... I'll try to cheer you up a little. The guideline will have to pass the new parliament later so lets hope that they will stand their ground! And lets make the correct election in the coming elections. We should also keep nagging our politicians about this point. Perhaps they'll realize that they are about to make a grave mistake! Btw. when will the Irish government end?? Perhaps we will get one at the top of the EU which will not get constant infu$ions from MS. Greetings Ben (who still believes in the possibility that it might become better) |
|
From: Benjamin M. <ben...@gm...> - 2004-05-19 17:50:24
|
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 02:58, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > On Tue, 18 May 2004, Todd ... wrote: > > > Greetings all. > > > > no idea why it can't seem to find libmp3lame.so.0, it exists in > > /usr/local/lib. I compiled and installed it myself (and did a ldconfig). > > Redhat, by default, does *NOT* include /usr/local/lib in the path where it > searches for libraries. (I don't know about FC2 but this was certainly > true in earlier RH editions) > > Add "/usr/loca/lib" to /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig again. > > Just one of the annoying features of Redhat, you are not the first to run > into this and I am afraid this won't be the last message that I write > about it.. > > best > > Vladimir Dergachev > > PS Hmm.. Read that again and it sounds a bit grouchy. Sorry ! I am just > in a bad mood bc of software patents in Europe. I better not rewrite this > e-mail though or it'll sound worse. Hmm... I'll try to cheer you up a little. The guideline will have to pass the new parliament later so lets hope that they will stand their ground! |
|
From: Vladimir D. <vo...@mi...> - 2004-05-19 00:58:31
|
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Todd ... wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> no idea why it can't seem to find libmp3lame.so.0, it exists in=20
> /usr/local/lib. I compiled and installed it myself (and did a ldconfig).
Redhat, by default, does *NOT* include /usr/local/lib in the path where it=
=20
searches for libraries. (I don't know about FC2 but this was certainly=20
true in earlier RH editions)
Add "/usr/loca/lib" to /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig again.
Just one of the annoying features of Redhat, you are not the first to run=
=20
into this and I am afraid this won't be the last message that I write=20
about it..
best
Vladimir Dergachev
PS Hmm.. Read that again and it sounds a bit grouchy. Sorry ! I am just
in a bad mood bc of software patents in Europe. I better not rewrite this
e-mail though or it'll sound worse.
>
> If anyone can make sense of this I would appreciate some suggestions on h=
ow=20
> to get it working.
>
> Thanks to all in advance.
> -Todd
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page =96 FR=
EE=20
> download! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
> Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
> 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D2562&alloc_id=3D6184&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> Gatos-devel mailing list
> Gat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gatos-devel
> |
|
From: Todd ... <pr0...@ho...> - 2004-05-18 23:15:51
|
Greetings all. Trying for probably the third time to get GATOS working properly on my system. I don't know why I have so much trouble. so now I turn to the experts. Here's the setup: AMD Athlon 2500+ 512MB ram ATI AIW Radeon 8500. Fedora Core 2 (also tried with Gentoo, and RedHat9) I installed the video drivers, it seems to be working (well, X started back up after the driver install, I know assumptions are usually bad, but I am taking that as "the drivers are working") now on to AVview. first I needed to install tk, no problem, snagged the rpms from the fc2 install CD and installed. now when I do a: ./configure --with-ffmpeg=/root/ffmpeg-0.4.8 where ffmpeg is sitting, compiled. it dies with: <snip> checking for existence of /root/tk8.4.6/unix/tkConfig.sh... loading checking ffmpeg version... *** AVview requires ffmpeg 0.4.8 If you are sure you are using correct version of ffmpeg check config.log for details # </snip> I believe this to be the relevant section of config.log: <snip> configure:7627: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -I/usr/src/ffmpeg-0.4.8/libavformat -I/usr/src/ffmpeg-0.4.8/libavcodec -L/usr/X11R6/lib conftest.c -lXinerama -lXv -lXext -lX11 -lvorbisenc -lvorbis -logg -lmp3lame -lasound -lzvbi -lpthread -lm -lz -ldl /usr/src/ffmpeg-0.4.8/libavformat/libavformat.a /usr/src/ffmpeg-0.4.8/libavcodec/libavcodec.a >&5 configure:7630: $? = 0 configure:7632: ./conftest ./conftest: error while loading shared libraries: libmp3lame.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory configure:7635: $? = 127 configure: program exited with status 127 </snip> no idea why it can't seem to find libmp3lame.so.0, it exists in /usr/local/lib. I compiled and installed it myself (and did a ldconfig). If anyone can make sense of this I would appreciate some suggestions on how to get it working. Thanks to all in advance. -Todd _________________________________________________________________ MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page FREE download! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/ |