|
From: David G. <go...@us...> - 2002-07-06 05:05:24
|
Adam Chodorowski wrote:
> Actually, I meant:
>=20
> 'author':nodes.authors,
> 'authors':nodes.authors
> =20
> Basically, the idea is to remove the difference between plural and
> singular for the use for the most part (only retain it where the
> language fits).
I think it best to leave the distinction::
:Authors: Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
This would look like two names. Using ":Author:" instead makes it
clear.
>> I suppose an "authors" element could revert to "author" if it only
>> contains a single author, so yes, that's feasible. For Swedish,
>> I'd suggest mapping a compound word like "one-author" to
>> nodes.author; that way it wouldn't be chosen accidentally but the
>> meaning would be explicit. Like this::
>>=20
>> 'f=F6rfattare-singular':nodes.author,
>> 'f=F6rfattare':nodes.authors
>=20
> Wouldn't it be possible to leave 'f=F6rfattare-singular' out totally?
> I mean, since nodes.authors would be converted into nodes.author if
> there is only one author, 'f=F6rfattare-singular' isn't really of much
> value at all.
True. Yes, leave it out.
> [FAQ directive]
>=20
>>> I actually have a FAQ document, where these directives would
>>> perhaps be usefull, although I have found that using section
>>> titles for the question and section contents works fine for a FAQ.
>>=20
>> That's a good idea. Except, you can only have short questions
>> because titles can only be one line long. Details!
>=20
> Hmmm... I read that part through, and the conclusion seems to be:
>=20
>> However, a simple enumerated or bulleted list will do just fine for
>> syntax. A directive could treat the list specially; e.g. the first
>> paragraph could be treated as a question, the remainder as the
>> answer (multiple answers could be represented by nested lists).
>=20
> But with that aproach you have the same problem: you can only have
> short questions!
No, the question paragraph could be as long as you like.
> Wouldn't it make more sense to use a bulleted list for the questions
> and answers, and alternating between them (ie. the first bullet is a
> question, the second the answer, the third the question, and so on)?
No, that would be too clumsy.
--=20
David Goodger <go...@us...> Open-source projects:
- Python Docutils: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/
(includes reStructuredText: http://docutils.sf.net/rst.html)
- The Go Tools Project: http://gotools.sourceforge.net/
|