xmd-support Mailing List for xmd (Page 7)
Brought to you by:
jrifkin
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
|
From: VaZH <rea...@ho...> - 2008-07-18 10:40:01
|
hi,everyone I also met some trouble in melting,by using morse potential table inversed from the Energy table created by CASTEP,I found several alloys could not melt until 6000k,but our potentials are pretty well in atomic site preference calculation,and if simulate those alloys, it's also hard to find out equalibrium melting point,and after melted at high temperature,then we quench them, or clamp at a lower temperature(such as 10k),system potential energy are continuing decreased and could hardly reach an equalibrium state. If anyone know the reason for such phenomena? or how to solve them? > Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:51:40 +0530> From: kau...@ya...> To: xmd...@li...> Subject: [Xmd-support] difference between perfect lattice and some defect.> > hello sir> regarding my previous querry you said that perfect lattice should not be used for melting point calculation because due to nucleation difficulty it will be super heating. but when we use any potential wich is semi empirical where we input elastic constant, melting point e.t.c apart from some data from first principle calculation to generate the potential table. and since we r using this potential in our calculation some defects are inherently there. so will it we correct to consider as perfect.> > another point is that for gold i am getting close to actual 1350 K, for Ni it is 200 K higher and for tungsten even it is not melting at 4000K. > > > > Bollywood, fun, friendship, sports and more. You name it, we have it on http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/bestofyahoo/> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08> _______________________________________________> Xmd-support mailing list> Xmd...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmd-support _________________________________________________________________ 这里好多好玩的视频,用鼠标点到视频看看,有惊喜! http://cnweb.search.live.com/video/results.aspx?q=%E5%A5%A5%E8%BF%90%E5%9C%A3%E7%81%AB&mkt=zh-cn&FORM=WLMTWC |
|
From: Luis S. <lu...@gm...> - 2008-07-14 13:02:58
|
Hello Kaush Gaya! What method are you using to calculate the meting point? I suggest this one: http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v49/i5/p3109_1 Good Day! |
|
From: singh k. <kau...@ya...> - 2008-07-14 11:21:41
|
hello sir
regarding my previous querry you said that perfect lattice should not be used for melting point calculation because due to nucleation difficulty it will be super heating. but when we use any potential wich is semi empirical where we input elastic constant, melting point e.t.c apart from some data from first principle calculation to generate the potential table. and since we r using this potential in our calculation some defects are inherently there. so will it we correct to consider as perfect.
another point is that for gold i am getting close to actual 1350 K, for Ni it is 200 K higher and for tungsten even it is not melting at 4000K.
Bollywood, fun, friendship, sports and more. You name it, we have it on http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/bestofyahoo/
|
|
From: Jon R. <jon...@uc...> - 2008-07-07 17:32:43
|
>1. i am not able to generate stress-strain curve on any metal for e.g > Ni or gold? Did you strain the lattice and write out the stress? See the examples http://xmd.sourceforge.net/examples/econst.xm.txt http://xmd.sourceforge.net/examples/econst2.xm.txt which describe how to strain the lattice. You can then use the WRITE STRESS command to print the stress. > 2. while calculating the melting point of metals i am not able to get > consistent result. i am ploting energy vs temperature and the change > is sudden energy i am considering to be the phase transformation. > what else i do to get consistent result. The melting point it very sensitive to the initial defects. If you have a perfect lattice, you will have to superheat the sample to start melting, and then because of the superheated temperature, the melting will happen very quickly. Try putting a free surface or even an dislocation in your sample before you try to melt it. Hope that helps. - Jon On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 12:07 +0530, singh kaush wrote: > hello > > i have two question? > 1. i am not able to generate stress-strain curve on any metal for e.g Ni or gold? > > 2. while calculating the melting point of metals i am not able to get consistent result. i am ploting energy vs temperature and the change is sudden energy i am considering to be the phase transformation. > what else i do to get consistent result. > > > > Meet people who discuss and share your passions. Go to http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/bestofyahoo/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! > Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, > along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness > and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 > _______________________________________________ > Xmd-support mailing list > Xmd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmd-support |
|
From: singh k. <kau...@ya...> - 2008-07-04 06:37:11
|
hello
i have two question?
1. i am not able to generate stress-strain curve on any metal for e.g Ni or gold?
2. while calculating the melting point of metals i am not able to get consistent result. i am ploting energy vs temperature and the change is sudden energy i am considering to be the phase transformation.
what else i do to get consistent result.
Meet people who discuss and share your passions. Go to http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/bestofyahoo/
|
|
From: santosh j. <bom...@gm...> - 2008-04-23 11:17:16
|
Respected Sir,
Thanks to your suggestion , I was able to scale them
differently. I was trying the second method you mentioned while your mail
came . Another problem I am facing is I have to measure the cutting and
thrust forces on the workpiece which are exerted due to its interaction with
the tool material during machining . ( These forces are just the
components of external force on the workpiece due to the tool) . When I use
the command " write extforce " on the workpiece it is saying that it gives
this force only when you initialize an external force . I would be grateful
if you could suggest a way to write the external force components on
workpiece atoms arising only due to the interaction with tool atoms .
Also I have been using the "potential eval" command to
create morse potential table values . Though I have got the parameter values
, the cut off radius is not being mentioned in most of the scientific
articles that I refer to . Can you please suggest whether I can use the same
cut off radius value for interaction between workpiece atoms and for
interaction between workpiece and tool atoms. ( In the articles they don't
specify for which interaction the cut off radius has been specified . )
Thanking you Sir,
Yours sincerely,
S.Santosh.
|
|
From: Jon R. <jon...@uc...> - 2008-04-16 19:35:17
|
Hi Santosh - There are two ways to do this. First, you could use the FILL command. This can set the lattice constant you want when you create the particles, so you won't need to scale them after. The second way is to use the MOVE command; it can scale positions. For example, if you want to scale a group of selected particles in the X direction, while at the same time leaving the particle at X=5 unmoved, you could do this, MOVE 1.1*(x-5) 0 0 Hope that helps. - Jon On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 01:00 +0530, santosh jeevan wrote: > Hi, > I am S.Santosh.I am trying to do MDS of nano machining. Here I > have to scale two different lattices ( workpiece and tool ) by > different scale factors . But in XMD using scale command,a ll atoms > are scaled.Can someone please suggest a way to selectively scale > atoms. > > Thanks in advance, > Yours > sincerely, > santosh > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ Xmd-support mailing list Xmd...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmd-support |
|
From: santosh j. <bom...@gm...> - 2008-04-16 19:30:39
|
Hi,
I am S.Santosh.I am trying to do MDS of nano machining. Here I have to
scale two different lattices ( workpiece and tool ) by different scale
factors . But in XMD using scale command,a ll atoms are scaled.Can someone
please suggest a way to selectively scale atoms.
Thanks in advance,
Yours sincerely,
santosh
|
|
From: santosh j. <bom...@gm...> - 2008-04-16 10:33:30
|
Hi,
I am S.Santosh.I am trying to do MDS of nano machining.I need to scale
two materials(tool and workpiece) with different scale factors.But in XMD
when I scale , all particles are scaled. Is there any method to selectively
scale the particles?
Thanks in
advance,
santosh.
|
|
From: santosh j. <bom...@gm...> - 2008-04-16 10:29:46
|
Hi,
This is S.Santosh.I have been trying to carry MDS for nano machining
.For this I need to scale the tool and workpiece with different scale
factors.But in XMD
|
|
From: emchanwk <emc...@us...> - 2008-01-16 12:01:16
|
Dear All I tried use VC++ 6.0 to compile xmd. It is OK but i don't know how to open the parallel process capability. Later, I installed Cygwin which is a Unix emulator in window and installed GCC. Section 6.2 of documentation tells me that to compile the parallel version, you must edit the Makefile and uncomment the following lines, #THREAD_LIB=-lpthread #DEF=-DUSE_THREAD_LIB -D_REENTRANT $(INTEL_PATCH)I cannot find the above two lines in makefile under /srcI hope to run the parallel computation in window platformPlease give me more instruction. ThanksWingkin |
|
From: Jon R. <jon...@uc...> - 2007-08-24 04:22:41
|
Did you use the pre-compiled Windows version or did you compile from source code? If you used the Windows version, I would recommend trying the version that you compile yourself. If you did use the compiled version, could you send me your input files so that I can test the program? - Jon On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 13:40 -0500, rohini yerram wrote: > Hello Dr. Jon Rifkin, > > When i executed the crack (companion program) > http://xmd.sourceforge.net/other/crack/crack.html, after executing the > crack command, in the output file, i didnt get > # Theoretical Critical Stress Intensity (erg/cm^2.5) 5.421088e > +07 > # Applied Stress Intensity (erg/cm^2.5) 5.421088e+07 > values. i got the output file only with perfect lattice positions and > displacements,with out any theoretical critical stress intensity and > applied stress intensity. can you suggest me or give me some ideas > regarding how to calculate stress intensity factors using crack > command. > > Rohini Yerram |
|
From: rohini y. <roh...@gm...> - 2007-08-19 18:40:26
|
Hello Dr. Jon Rifkin,
When i executed the crack (companion program)
http://xmd.sourceforge.net/other/crack/crack.html, after executing the crack
command, in the output file, i didnt get
# Theoretical Critical Stress Intensity (erg/cm^2.5) 5.421088e+07
# Applied Stress Intensity (erg/cm^2.5) 5.421088e+07
values. i got the output file only with perfect lattice positions and
displacements,with out any theoretical critical stress intensity and applied
stress intensity. can you suggest me or give me some ideas regarding how to
calculate stress intensity factors using crack command.
Rohini Yerram
|
|
From: Jon R. <jon...@uc...> - 2007-08-13 23:21:01
|
You can use the PLOT command to produce plots of the atoms in postscript output. - Jon On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 18:54 -0500, rohini yerram wrote: > hello XMD users, > > > > I exexuted XMD for 3d stress program. > > > > clamp 300 > > itemp 300 > > cmd 1000 > > > > i exexuted the MD simulation with the help of vmoviec and wmoviec. i > want to take snapshots during the molecular dynamic simulation. > > > > please explain me how can i take snapshots for a particular time > during the molecular dynamic simulation. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ Xmd-support mailing list Xmd...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmd-support |
|
From: Alexander O. <oll...@gm...> - 2007-08-13 12:07:18
|
2 week ago I write. Dear XMD users! I have execute XMD for 3d MD simulation: : itemp 1000 clamp 1000 eunit K esave 100 TK.txt cmd 100000 ... I found that average value of kinetic energy is 1250. If I set any other value for clamp, scale factor is the same - 1.25. Please, explain my why. My wondering was due to value of scale factor =1.25 < 1.5 (3/2). Sorry for disturbance, I found that difference is due to my boundary condition. |
|
From: rohini y. <roh...@gm...> - 2007-08-01 23:54:51
|
hello XMD users, I exexuted XMD for 3d stress program. clamp 300 itemp 300 cmd 1000 i exexuted the MD simulation with the help of vmoviec and wmoviec. i want to take snapshots during the molecular dynamic simulation. please explain me how can i take snapshots for a particular time during the molecular dynamic simulation. |
|
From: Alexander O. <oll...@gm...> - 2007-07-30 13:02:22
|
Dear XMD users! I have execute XMD for 3d MD simulation: . itemp 1000 clamp 1000 eunit K esave 100 TK.txt cmd 100000 ... I found that average value of kinetic energy is 1250. If I set any other value for clamp, scale factor is the same - 1.25. Please, explain my why. |
|
From: Avan<av...@gm...> - 2007-07-13 07:22:00
|
RGVhciBBbGwsDQoNCkkgd2FudCB0byBjYWxjdWxhdGUgdGhlIGZvcmNlcyBvbiBlYWNoIGF0b20g aW4gYSBzdXBlcmNlbGwuDQpUaGUgbGF0dGljZSB2ZWN0b3JzIG9mIHRoZSBzdXBlcmNlbGwgSSBu ZWVkIGlzDQowIDEgMQ0KMSAwIDENCjEgMSAwDQp3aGljaCBpcyBkb3VibGUgb2YgdGhlIGZjYyBs YXR0aWNlIHZlY3RvcnMNCiAwIDEvMiAxLzINCiAxLzIgMCAxLzINCiAxLzIgMS8yIDANCg0KVGhl cmUgYXJlIDggYXRvbXMgaW4gdGhlIHN1cGVyY2VsbC4NCg0Kd2hlbiBJIHVzZSB0aGUgImZpbGwi IHNldHRpbmcgQSAoc2VlIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcpLCB0aGUgRVBPVCBpcyA2LjkyNDg5MjEyMmUt MDEgZVYuIChzZWVtcyB3cm9uZykNCkFuZCB0aGUgZm9yY2UgKHdyaXRlIGZpbGUgZm9yY2UueG1v IGZvcmNlKSBpcyBub3QgY29ycmVjdGVkLCB0b28uICh0b28gbGFyZ2UgZm9yIHRoaXMgcGVyZmVj dCBsYXR0aWNlKQ0KDQpUaGUgY29ycmVjdCBvbmUgc2hvdWxkIGJlIGFib3V0IC0zLjM2IGVWLCB3 aGljaCBjYW4gYmUgZ290IGZyb20gdGhlICJmaWxsIiBzZXR0aW5nIEIuIChFUE9UIC0zLjM2NjU0 MzE5N2UrMDAgZVYpDQpJdCBzZWVtcyB0aGF0IHRoZSBmaWxsIGNvbW1hbmQgaXMgbm90IHN1aXQg Zm9yIHRoZSBzdXBlcmNlbGwgY29uc3RydWN0aW9uID8gb3IgSSBkbyBzb21ldGhpbmcgaW5jb3Jy ZWN0bHk/DQpXb3VsZCB5b3UgcGxlYXNlIGdpdmUgbWUgc29tZSBhZHZpY2VzPyBUaGFua3MuDQoN CmJ0dywgaG93IHRvIGdldCB0aGUgZm9yY2Ugb25seSBmb3IgdGhlIGF0b21zIGluIHRoZSBjZWxs L3N1cGVyY2VsbCB3aGVuICJ3cml0ZSBmaWxlIGZvcmNlLnhtbyBmb3JjZSIgaXMgdXNlZD8gVGhh bmtzLg0KDQpUaGUgcG90IEkgdXNlZCBpcyB0aGUgbmlhbC50eHQgaW4gdGhlIGV4YW1wbGVzIERJ Ui4gKEFsLCB0eXBlMikNCg0KDQooMSkgImZpbGwiIHNldHRpbmcgQQ0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQ0KY2FsYyBOWD04DQpjYWxjIE5ZPTgNCmNhbGMgTlo9OA0KDQpib3ggTlgg TlkgTloNCnBhcnRpY2xlIDgNCjIgICAwLjAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMCAgIDAuMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MDAwICAgMC4wMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDANCjIgICAwLjUwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMCAgIDAuMDAwMDAw MDAwMDAwMDAwICAgMC4wMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDANCjIgICAwLjAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMCAgIDAu NTAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwICAgMC4wMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDANCjIgICAwLjUwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MCAgIDAuNTAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwICAgMC4wMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDANCjIgICAwLjAwMDAwMDAw MDAwMDAwMCAgIDAuMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwICAgMC41MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDANCjIgICAwLjUw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMCAgIDAuMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwICAgMC41MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDANCjIg ICAwLjAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMCAgIDAuNTAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwICAgMC41MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MDANCjIgICAwLjUwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMCAgIDAuNTAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwICAgMC41MDAwMDAw MDAwMDAwMDANCmZpbGwgY2VsbA0KIDAgMSAxDQogMSAwIDENCiAxIDEgMA0KZmlsbCBnbw0KY2Fs YyAgQTA9NC4wNQ0Kc2NhbGUgQTANCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQoNCigy KSAiZmlsbCIgc2V0dGluZyBCDQotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQpjYWxjIE5Y PTgNCmNhbGMgTlk9OA0KY2FsYyBOWj04DQoNCmJveCBOWCBOWSBOWg0KcGFydGljbGUgOA0KMiAg IDAuMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwICAgMC4wMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAgICAwLjAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MA0KZmlsbCBjZWxsDQogMCAxLzIgMS8yDQogMS8yIDAgMS8yDQogMS8yIDEvMiAwDQpmaWxsIGdv DQpjYWxjICBBMD00LjA1DQpzY2FsZSBBMA0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0N Cg0KQmVzdCBSZWdhcmRzLA0KDQpBdmFuDQo8YXZhbnd1QGdtYWlsLmNvbT4NCg0KDQoNCg0KMjAw Ny0wNy0xMyANCg== |
|
From: hamed a. <hat...@ya...> - 2007-06-03 09:12:56
|
How can we obtain the engineering stress from the stress result in XMD ?
---------------------------------
Building a website is a piece of cake.
Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. |
|
From: Jon R. <jon...@uc...> - 2007-05-29 13:15:28
|
> in XMD, basic thermostat is berendsen. (right?) It is similar to the Berendsen thermostat, but not exactly. The Berendsen thermostat scales the atomic velocities by the factor sqrt(1 + (dt/L) * (T/T0-1)) where dt is the simulation time step, T0 is the thermostat setting, T is the instantaneous temperature, the L is the "rise time". In XMD, we use the following velocity scaling factor, sqrt((T/T0)^(dt/L)) where the value dt/L is called CSTEP in the CLAMP command. > Is it possible to use another thermostat like Nose-Hoover? Sorry, Nose-Hoover is not included in the XMD code. - Jon |
|
From: <cu...@ka...> - 2007-05-28 01:56:52
|
aW4gWE1ELCBiYXNpYyB0aGVybW9zdGF0IGlzIGJlcmVuZHNlbi4gKHJpZ2h0PykNCklzIGl0IHBv c3NpYmxlIHRvIHVzZSBhbm90aGVyIHRoZXJtb3N0YXQgbGlrZSBOb3NlLUhvb3Zlcj8NCg== |
|
From: Dr. H. Bo L. <hb...@im...> - 2007-04-10 20:58:41
|
Hi,
I found the attached was scrubbed. I do not whether somebody could
receive it, let me paste it here.
# Reference:
# Fabrizio Cleri and Vittorio Rosato
# Tight-binding potentials for transition metals and alloys
# Physical Review B48, 22(1993)
# -----start--------
#Parameters for Ag
eunit eV
potential set eam 1
calc A=0.1028
calc Y=1.178
calc p=10.928
calc q=3.139
calc a0=4.085
calc r0=a0*sqrt(2.0)/2
potential formula pair 1 1 5000 1.0 5.8
2*A*exp(-p*(r/r0-1.0))
potential formula dens 1 5000 1.0 5.8
Y*Y*exp(-2*q*(r/r0-1.0))
potential formula embed 1 50000 1e-8 2000
-sqrt(r)
# potential write plot pair 1 1
# potential write plot dens 1
# potential write plot embed 1
#--------end--------
Best,
Dr. Hongbo Liu
xmd...@li... wrote:
> Send Xmd-support mailing list submissions to
> xmd...@li...
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmd-support
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> xmd...@li...
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> xmd...@li...
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Xmd-support digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Xmd-support Digest, Vol 7, Issue 1 SMTB potential
> (Dr. Hong Bo Liu)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:23:24 -0500
> From: "Dr. Hong Bo Liu" <hb...@im...>
> Subject: Re: [Xmd-support] Xmd-support Digest, Vol 7, Issue 1 SMTB
> potential
> To: xmd...@li...
> Message-ID: <461...@im...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> Attached is SMTB potential for silver. It is a text file and can be used
> directly in the XMD input file.
>
> Best,
>
> Dr. Hongbo Liu
>
> xmd...@li... wrote:
>
>> Send Xmd-support mailing list submissions to
>> xmd...@li...
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmd-support
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> xmd...@li...
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> xmd...@li...
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Xmd-support digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. EAM potential (Justo Rojas Tapia)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:55:21 -0500
>> From: Justo Rojas Tapia <jr...@ip...>
>> Subject: [Xmd-support] EAM potential
>> To: xmd...@li...
>> Message-ID: <117...@jr...>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I need to obtain the EAM potential of silver in appropriate format for
>> the XMD. Could anybody help me?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Justo Rojas
>>
>> Instituto Peruano de Enegia Nuclear
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Este mensaje electr?nico y sus documentos adjuntos, s?lo son para conocimiento y uso de la persona(s) y/o Instituci?n a quien va dirigido.
>> Si usted no es el destinatario(s), agradeceremos se abstenga de copiarlos, divulgarlos o usarlos, as? como agradeceremos comunique este error a la siguiente direcci?n pos...@ip... y borre de su equipo este mensaje y los documentos adjuntos en caso contenga alguno.
>> La lectura de este mensaje presupone que usted comprende y acepta los t?rminos de este aviso
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xmd-support mailing list
>> Xmd...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmd-support
>>
>>
>> End of Xmd-support Digest, Vol 7, Issue 1
>> *****************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
> Name: Ag.xmd
>
> ------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xmd-support mailing list
> Xmd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmd-support
>
>
> End of Xmd-support Digest, Vol 7, Issue 2
> *****************************************
>
>
>
|
|
From: Dr. H. Bo L. <hb...@im...> - 2007-04-10 13:23:42
|
Hi, Attached is SMTB potential for silver. It is a text file and can be used directly in the XMD input file. Best, Dr. Hongbo Liu xmd...@li... wrote: > Send Xmd-support mailing list submissions to > xmd...@li... > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmd-support > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > xmd...@li... > > You can reach the person managing the list at > xmd...@li... > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Xmd-support digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. EAM potential (Justo Rojas Tapia) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:55:21 -0500 > From: Justo Rojas Tapia <jr...@ip...> > Subject: [Xmd-support] EAM potential > To: xmd...@li... > Message-ID: <117...@jr...> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hello everybody, > > I need to obtain the EAM potential of silver in appropriate format for > the XMD. Could anybody help me? > > Thanks in advance > > Justo Rojas > > Instituto Peruano de Enegia Nuclear > > > > > Este mensaje electr?nico y sus documentos adjuntos, s?lo son para conocimiento y uso de la persona(s) y/o Instituci?n a quien va dirigido. > Si usted no es el destinatario(s), agradeceremos se abstenga de copiarlos, divulgarlos o usarlos, as? como agradeceremos comunique este error a la siguiente direcci?n pos...@ip... y borre de su equipo este mensaje y los documentos adjuntos en caso contenga alguno. > La lectura de este mensaje presupone que usted comprende y acepta los t?rminos de este aviso > > > > > ------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Xmd-support mailing list > Xmd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmd-support > > > End of Xmd-support Digest, Vol 7, Issue 1 > ***************************************** > > > |
|
From: Justo R. T. <jr...@ip...> - 2007-04-04 18:53:38
|
Hello everybody, I need to obtain the EAM potential of silver in appropriate format for the XMD. Could anybody help me? Thanks in advance Justo Rojas Instituto Peruano de Enegia Nuclear Este mensaje electr=F3nico y sus documentos adjuntos, s=F3lo son para = conocimiento y uso de la persona(s) y/o Instituci=F3n a quien va = dirigido. Si usted no es el destinatario(s), agradeceremos se abstenga de = copiarlos, divulgarlos o usarlos, as=ED como agradeceremos comunique = este error a la siguiente direcci=F3n pos...@ip... y borre de = su equipo este mensaje y los documentos adjuntos en caso contenga = alguno. La lectura de este mensaje presupone que usted comprende y acepta los = t=E9rminos de este aviso |
|
From: <Jon...@Uc...> - 2006-12-18 04:07:38
|
Frank - > i sent this patch to jon.rifkin but got no answer so far. i wonder whether he is still maintaining xmd. that's why i decided to send the patch to the mailinglist, too. I didn't respond to your original email because I din't get a chanced to check my mail on Friday, but I'm glad you followed up on the mailing list. > please find attached a patch to fix the macro for the derivative of f_a. > this could be the reason for the 'factor 2 off' concerning > BondStrengthD, and if that's for sure, you most probably want to skip the > correction. Thanks for the tip. I will correct the code. However, the code you corrected has no effect on BoundStrengthD, because is not used in the program, since the only call to that MACRO is inactive because it lies between the directives #if 0 #endif My recollection is that I disabled that MACRO code because it didn't work. And, it probably didn't work because of the error you found. > i would be very thankful for any information concerning analytical > calculation of the virial for tersoff potentials (dV_ij / dr x r_ij). as > far as i understood, you do the pressure calc numerically by variation > of the site lengths. any ideas? XMD calculates virial term you cite for the Tersoff potential using an analytically derived formula. Unfortunately, I don't have the derivation on hand. Basically, it the expressing the system potential energy as a sum of the atomic positions of the Tersoff functional form, and then expressing the atomic positions as a function of a uniform system strain, and then finally taking the derivate of that as a function of the strain. I hope that helps. - Jon |