Probably requires [#214] to have acceptable performance
What and Why
In the SpinBoson/1 demo, we compose a rather complex potential from simple terms. In principle, this is quite nice and pretty, but there are some issues:
- you need several lines of setup to define the individual terms
- you need to compactify the potential afterwards (actually, we probably need to squeeze a lot more than what is done here)
- Some terms (e.g., sin(theta)) are difficult to construct in this way.
Think about solutions to these problems.
Diff:
Related
Tickets: #214