[Vis5d-users] Re: VRML1 output

I don't believe we ever created a version for VRML1.0 output. At least,
the earliest version of the code I could find in our CVS repository used
the "#VRML 2.0" header in the file. (I didn't look close enough to
determine if it was VRML2.0 or VRML97.)

The VRML97 standard was standardized in December of 97, and VRML2.0 was
in use for a year or more before that. So, are you really using that old
of a VRML reader? What are you using that needs VRML1.0?

(The VRML output from vis5d+ conforms to the VRML97 standard.)

I don't believe you will have much luck editing things out to make it
conform to VRML1.0 - if I remember correctly 1.0 was pretty limited, and
you would probably end up commenting out most of the VRML file. But, I
suppose you could try...

jeff

Jim Edwards wrote:
> 
> Igor,
> 
> I don't think there is but you may be able to go into the (text) vrml output
> file and hand edit any 2.0 specific stuff out?  This may or may not be an
> easy solution.  I think that most vrml readers available now support 2.0 -
> how about updating your reader?
> 
> Jim
> 
> Igor Goncharenko wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am looking for Vis5d+ source codes similar to "graphics.vrml.c" for VRML
> > 1.0 output instead of VRML2.0.
> >
> > Is the code for VRML1 exporting available?
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Igor.
> > ======================================
> > Igor GONCHARENKO,
> > 3D Inc., Bandaicho 1-2-12, Naka-ku,
> > Yokohama 231-0031, JAPAN
> > e-mail: ig...@dd...
> > Fax:  +81-45-650-5791
> > Tel.: +81-45-650-5797
> > ======================================

-- 
Jeff W. Boote  <bo...@uc...>      The more that you read, the more
Software Engineer                    things you will know.  The more
VETS/SCD/NCAR                        that you learn, the more places
Boulder, Colorado, USA               you'll go.        Dr. Suess