Re: Thoughts on disabling an old dissector

[Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>]

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:33:00PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
> This was originally filed as bug 9569. The situation is sufficiently
> unusual that I really don't know what the best solution is, so I
> figured I'd ask for general comments from the list. The company who
> created and used the TPNCP protocol (and submitted the packet-tpncp.c
> dissector) wants to reuse that name for a new, different protocol and
> are asking us to disable the old dissector to avoid conflicts. The bug
> has more detail.
>
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9569

I just added the following to the bug:
"""
My preferred solution would be to keep the old protocol as version 1,
add the new protocol as version 2 into the same dissector and add a
preference to select which  version to use (with a default of 2). It
doesn't have to be 1 or 2 of course.
"""

Ciao
    Jörg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe