[go: up one dir, main page]

McDonald et al., 2007 - Google Patents

Why rescue the administrative data version of the “failure to rescue” quality indicator

McDonald et al., 2007

Document ID
3457400540327753844
Author
McDonald K
Davies S
Geppert J
Romano P
Publication year
Publication venue
Medical care

External Links

Snippet

Just as continuous quality improvement is needed for the highly complex world of health care delivery, measurement of quality itself merits continual examination. With the price tag for health care rising and increased public awareness of medical error, pressures continue …
Continue reading at journals.lww.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
    • G06F19/322Management of patient personal data, e.g. patient records, conversion of records or privacy aspects
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/22Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
    • G06Q50/24Patient record management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
    • G06F19/327Management of hospital data, e.g. scheduling of medical staff or operation rooms, measuring the quality or efficiency of medical staff
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/3418Telemedicine, e.g. remote diagnosis, remote control of instruments or remote monitoring of patient carried devices
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/36Computer-assisted acquisition of medical data, e.g. computerised clinical trials or questionnaires
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
    • G06Q10/063Operations research or analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Kutney-Lee et al. Electronic health record usability: associations with nurse and patient outcomes in hospitals
Mercieca-Bebber et al. The importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials and strategies for future optimization
Ohlsson et al. Secular trends in pubertal growth acceleration in Swedish boys born from 1947 to 1996
Kawamoto et al. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success
Beal et al. Quality measures for children’s health care
Blegen et al. Nurse staffing effects on patient outcomes: safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals
Dubois et al. Associations of patient safety outcomes with models of nursing care organization at unit level in hospitals
Horn et al. Another look at observational studies in rehabilitation research: going beyond the holy grail of the randomized controlled trial
Graber et al. Diagnostic error in internal medicine
Khairat et al. Physicians’ gender and their use of electronic health records: findings from a mixed-methods usability study
Carthon et al. The quality of hospital work environments and missed nursing care is linked to heart failure readmissions: a cross-sectional study of US hospitals
Brown III et al. Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating mobile health (mHealth) technology
Gurol‐Urganci et al. Mobile phone messaging for communicating results of medical investigations
Singh et al. Identifying diagnostic errors in primary care using an electronic screening algorithm
Nutting et al. Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when?
Jaensson et al. The development of the Recovery Assessments by Phone Points (RAPP): a mobile phone app for postoperative recovery monitoring and assessment
Kouladjian et al. Development, validation and evaluation of an electronic pharmacological tool: the Drug Burden Index Calculator©
Blay et al. Methodological integrative review of the work sampling technique used in nursing workload research
Cipparone et al. Inaccuracy of ICD-9 codes for chronic kidney disease: a study from two practice-based research networks (PBRNs)
Diaz-Skeete et al. Analysis of apps with a medication list functionality for older adults with heart failure using the mobile app rating scale and the ims institute for healthcare informatics functionality score: Evaluation study
Talsma et al. The relationship between nurse staffing and failure to rescue: where does it matter most?
Ross et al. Can we improve physical health monitoring for patients taking antipsychotics on a mental health inpatient unit?
Cavanaugh et al. Reflections on ambulatory care nursing and the impact of the clinical nurse specialist
Overton et al. Are ecological momentary assessments of pain valid and reliable? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Saha et al. Flexible and innovative connectivity solution to support national decentralized infectious diseases point-of-care testing programs in primary health services: descriptive evaluation study