Hardesty et al., 2005 - Google Patents
Is maximum positive predictive value a good indicator of an optimal screening mammography practice?Hardesty et al., 2005
View HTML- Document ID
- 15841850752396260520
- Author
- Hardesty L
- Klym A
- Shindel B
- Chough D
- Sumkin J
- Gur D
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
External Links
Snippet
OBJECTIVE. Positive predictive value (PPV1) has been used as one important indicator of the quality of screening mammography programs. We show how the relationship between sensitivity and recall rate may affect the operating point at which optimal (maximum) PPV1 …
- 238000009607 mammography 0 title abstract description 25
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
- G06F19/321—Management of medical image data, e.g. communication or archiving systems such as picture archiving and communication systems [PACS] or related medical protocols such as digital imaging and communications in medicine protocol [DICOM]; Editing of medical image data, e.g. adding diagnosis information
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
- G06F19/322—Management of patient personal data, e.g. patient records, conversion of records or privacy aspects
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
- G06F19/328—Health insurance management, e.g. payments or protection against fraud
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/345—Medical expert systems, neural networks or other automated diagnosis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/22—Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
- G06Q50/24—Patient record management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
- G06F3/048—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Rhodes et al. | Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts | |
| Gromet | Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms | |
| Northcutt et al. | MDCT of adrenal masses: Can dual-phase enhancement patterns be used to differentiate adenoma and pheochromocytoma? | |
| Bent et al. | The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories | |
| Séradour et al. | Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program | |
| Obuchowski | Sample size tables for receiver operating characteristic studies | |
| Cole et al. | Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammography | |
| Brem et al. | Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer | |
| Grabler et al. | Recall and cancer detection rates for screening mammography: finding the sweet spot | |
| Raikhlin et al. | Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in high-risk patients: retrospective review | |
| Weigert et al. | Results of a multicenter patient registry to determine the clinical impact of breast-specific gamma imaging, a molecular breast imaging technique | |
| Irshad et al. | Effects of changes in BI-RADS density assessment guidelines (fourth versus fifth edition) on breast density assessment: intra-and interreader agreements and density distribution | |
| Oestreicher et al. | The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program | |
| Gaffney et al. | Increasing utilization of MRI before prostate biopsy in Black and non-Black men: an analysis of the SEER-Medicare cohort | |
| Hayward et al. | Improving screening mammography outcomes through comparison with multiple prior mammograms | |
| Dubinsky et al. | The role of transvaginal sonography and endometrial biopsy in the evaluation of peri-and postmenopausal bleeding. | |
| Rauscher et al. | Beyond the mammography quality standards act: measuring the quality of breast cancer screening programs | |
| Scialpi et al. | Simplified prostate imaging reporting and data system for biparametric prostate MRI: a proposal | |
| Pooler et al. | Potentially important extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: incidence and outcomes data from a clinical screening program | |
| Song et al. | Morphologic features of 211 adrenal masses at initial contrast-enhanced CT: can we differentiate benign from malignant lesions using imaging features alone? | |
| Brem et al. | A computer-aided detection system for the evaluation of breast cancer by mammographic appearance and lesion size | |
| Dibble et al. | Dense breast ultrasound screening after digital mammography versus after digital breast tomosynthesis | |
| Pedersen et al. | Reproducibility of depth of extramural tumor spread and distance to circumferential resection margin at rectal MRI: enhancement of clinical guidelines for neoadjuvant therapy | |
| Floyd Jr et al. | Case-based reasoning computer algorithm that uses mammographic findings for breast biopsy decisions | |
| Georgian-Smith et al. | Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography |