de Molon et al., 2013 - Google Patents
Comparison of changes in dental and bone radiographic densities in the presence of different soft-tissue simulators using pixel intensity and digital subtraction …de Molon et al., 2013
View PDF- Document ID
- 13180489582299680755
- Author
- de Molon R
- Batitucci R
- Spin-Neto R
- Paquier G
- Sakakura C
- Tosoni G
- Scaf G
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
External Links
Snippet
Objectives: To evaluate the influence of soft-tissue simulation materials on dental and bone tissue radiographic densities using pixel intensity (PI) and digital subtraction radiography (DSR) analyses. Methods: 15 dry human mandibles were divided into halves. Each half was …
- 210000004872 soft tissue 0 title abstract description 56
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/58—Testing, adjusting or calibrating devices for radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/582—Calibration
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/02—Devices for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/03—Computerised tomographs
- A61B6/032—Transmission computed tomography [CT]
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
- A61B6/482—Diagnostic techniques involving multiple energy imaging
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/50—Clinical applications
- A61B6/505—Clinical applications involving diagnosis of bone
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/42—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment with arrangements for detecting radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/4291—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment with arrangements for detecting radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis the detector being combined with a grid or grating
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/14—Applications or adaptations for dentistry
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/40—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment with arrangements for generating radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
- A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
- A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/44—Constructional features of the device for radiation diagnosis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/52—Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation not covered by G01N21/00 or G01N22/00, e.g. X-rays or neutrons
- G01N23/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation not covered by G01N21/00 or G01N22/00, e.g. X-rays or neutrons by transmitting the radiation through the material
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Vandenberghe et al. | Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects | |
Haiter-Neto et al. | Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions | |
Mol et al. | In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone | |
Ganguly et al. | Accuracy of linear measurement in the Galileos cone beam computed tomography under simulated clinical conditions | |
Kamburoğlu et al. | Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view | |
de Faria Vasconcelos et al. | Detection of periodontal bone loss using cone beam CT and intraoral radiography | |
Schropp et al. | Validity of wax and acrylic as soft-tissue simulation materials used in in vitro radiographic studies | |
Ballrick et al. | Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine | |
Bechara et al. | Cone beam CT scans with and without artefact reduction in root fracture detection of endodontically treated teeth | |
Christiansen et al. | Periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the periapical bone defect 1 week and 12 months after root-end resection | |
Young et al. | A comparative study of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography and charge-coupled device sensors for detecting caries | |
Kambungton et al. | Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film | |
Özen et al. | Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film | |
Menezes et al. | Precision, reproducibility, and accuracy of bone crest level measurements of CBCT cross sections using different resolutions | |
Tanomaru-FIlho et al. | Two-and tridimensional analysis of periapical repair after endodontic surgery | |
Kositbowornchai et al. | Accuracy of diagnosing occlusal caries using enhanced digital images | |
Terry et al. | A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts | |
Al-Okshi et al. | Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography | |
Bayat et al. | Detection of simulated periodontal defects using cone-beam CT and digital intraoral radiography | |
Al-Okshi et al. | Dose optimization for assessment of periodontal structures in cone beam CT examinations | |
Hedeşiu et al. | Comparison of cone beam CT device and field of view for the detection of simulated periapical bone lesions | |
Krzyżostaniak et al. | A comparative study of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiographic modalities for the detection of noncavitated caries | |
Møller et al. | Comparison of images from digital intraoral receptors and cone beam computed tomography scanning for detection of voids in root canal fillings: an in vitro study using micro-computed tomography as validation | |
Kamburoğlu et al. | Accuracy of chemically created periapical lesion measurements using limited cone beam computed tomography | |
Hashem et al. | An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of measurements obtained from high-and low-resolution cone-beam computed tomography scans |