Chen et al., 2022 - Google Patents
What I Say Means What I Do: Risk Concerns and Mobile Application-Selection BehaviorsChen et al., 2022
- Document ID
- 8446585745870097276
- Author
- Chen J
- Ge H
- Li N
- Proctor R
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Human Factors
External Links
Snippet
Objective The goal of this study was to examine the relation between users' reported risk concerns and their choice behaviors in a mobile application (app) selection task. Background Human users are typically regarded as the weakest link in cybersecurity and …
- 230000006399 behavior 0 title abstract description 61
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Gautam et al. | Online banking service practices and its impact on e-customer satisfaction and e-customer loyalty in developing country of South Asia-Nepal | |
| Love et al. | Perpetrator risk markers for intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: A meta-analysis | |
| Kalogeropoulos et al. | News brand attribution in distributed environments: Do people know where they get their news? | |
| Alexander III et al. | Using big data and machine learning in personality measurement: Opportunities and challenges | |
| Kumar et al. | Extending the TAM model: Intention of management students to use mobile banking: Evidence from India | |
| Mosteller et al. | To share and protect: Using regulatory focus theory to examine the privacy paradox of consumers’ social media engagement and online privacy protection behaviors | |
| Carter | Institutional pressures and isomorphism: The impact on intelligence-led policing adoption | |
| Kahne et al. | Educating for democracy in a partisan age: Confronting the challenges of motivated reasoning and misinformation | |
| Reynolds et al. | Mutually adaptive effects of interpersonal communication | |
| Gibson | Measuring political tolerance and general support for pro–civil liberties policies: Notes, evidence, and cautions | |
| Cain et al. | Everybody wants some: Collection and control of personal information, privacy concerns, and social media use | |
| Simonsohn | Direct risk aversion: Evidence from risky prospects valued below their worst outcome | |
| Armor et al. | Prescribed optimism: Is it right to be wrong about the future? | |
| Klavina et al. | Protesting to protect “us” and/or “them”? Explaining why members of third groups are willing to engage in collective action | |
| Shen et al. | Making sense of nonsense: The visual salience of units determines sensitivity to magnitude | |
| Chen et al. | Influence of risk/safety information framing on android app-installation decisions | |
| Li et al. | The more you ask, the less you get: When additional questions hurt external validity | |
| Yarbrough et al. | Social learning and self-control: Assessing the moderating potential of criminal propensity | |
| Song et al. | Motivations, propensities, and their interplays on online bullying perpetration: A partial test of situational action theory | |
| Denning et al. | When polarization triggers out-group “counter-projection” across the political divide | |
| Li | Understanding eHealth literacy from a privacy perspective: eHealth literacy and digital privacy skills in American disadvantaged communities | |
| Mavletova et al. | Grid and item-by-item formats in PC and mobile web surveys | |
| Yan et al. | Exploring the effect of individual differences on self-efficacy in getting information | |
| Zha et al. | Comparing digital libraries in the web and mobile contexts from the perspective of the digital divide | |
| Griep et al. | Perceived identity threat and organizational cynicism in the recursive relationship between psychological contract breach and counterproductive work behavior |