Directed by: Ridley Scott
Starring: Josh Hartnett, Sam Shepard, Tom Sizemore, William Fichtner, Ewan MacGregor, Eric Bana
Maybe I'm missing the point of Black Hawk Down. Ridley Scott's war film documents the failed Mogadishu raid of October 1993 in which U.S. forces, expecting a cakewalk operation, descended upon a meeting of a warlord's lieutenants and met heavy resistance causing numerous casualties. Many American soldiers were killed and a helicopter was shot down. Black Hawk Down's technical prowess is not in question, but after a while, the movie is all shooting, blood, and soldiers' body parts being shot off. It gets boring, and we grow numb to it.
Released three years after Saving Private Ryan broke the mold with its realistic battle sequences, Black Hawk Down upped the ante with little else but all battle sequences. Saving Private Ryan's opening D-Day battles were shocking and visceral, but then the story took over and there were calms before the storms. We saw what the story evolved into: A tale of sacrifice and what it truly means to be the one whom others sacrificed their lives for. "Earn this" became not just two words, but a challenge to the surviving Private James Francis Ryan. Black Hawk Down has no such moments, in fact the soldiers themselves are hardly people at all, but simply cogs in a machine. Maybe that's the point, but it doesn't make for a fully engaging experience. In a footnote, both movies feature Tom Sizemore.
Yes, there are breaks in the action where soldiers retreat to base to reload and rethink their strategy, but it's all confusing anyway. Characters discuss their plan, which goes awry, and then soon after we see a soldier lying dead with his innards exposed for the world to see. We don't have a point of view where any of this makes sense. Without the stakes, Black Hawk Down becomes war porn. (I think I just made that term up).