Suppressing SIGBUS signals

Posted Jun 27, 2021 9:42 UTC (Sun) by eru (subscriber, #2753)
Parent article: Suppressing SIGBUS signals

responded with an implementation of MAP_NOSIGBUS, which differs from __MAP_NOFAULT in a number of ways

I wonder why? Would it not be useful if *ix -style systems implemented similar extensions similarly? That would help porting and also they would probably eventually get standardized.