[go: up one dir, main page]

|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

On Linux kernel maintainer scalability

On Linux kernel maintainer scalability

Posted Oct 13, 2016 16:51 UTC (Thu) by wsa (guest, #52415)
In reply to: On Linux kernel maintainer scalability by blackwood
Parent article: On Linux kernel maintainer scalability

Subsystems differ. As tglx nicely put it at LinuxCon, I2C is more of a "drive-by" subsystem. You do the driver, get it accepted, then move on to, say, SPI. This is different from GFX and network drivers which need more constant attention. So IMO, there it is easier to keep developers also attached to the whole subsystem, too.

That being said, I got co-maintainers for ACPI and muxes. I definately am willing to share responsibility and do that when I see talent. Currently, though, there are exactly 0 regular reviewers on the list which I could award with extra responsibility.


to post comments

On Linux kernel maintainer scalability

Posted Oct 24, 2016 14:44 UTC (Mon) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263) [Link]

It also depends on the subsystem. Networking and filesystems are easy, you can test whatever you have on almost any machine, not dependent on particular hardware.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds