Comparing GCC and Clang security features

Posted Sep 17, 2019 13:10 UTC (Tue) by foom (subscriber, #14868)
In reply to: Comparing GCC and Clang security features by roc
Parent article: Comparing GCC and Clang security features

While that can be true in general, it won't be for an integer wrapping type. There is no reason to write a custom move/copy constructor, or destructor, for such a type.

Additionally, if you're ok using a compiler extension, Clang has an attribute that can be used to force trivial abi, if you do have a type which can be passed in registers despite having non-trivial constructors/destructors: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#trivi...