Comparing GCC and Clang security features
Comparing GCC and Clang security features
Posted Sep 13, 2019 11:52 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304)Parent article: Comparing GCC and Clang security features
Just a thought, and barely even a woolly thought, certainly not anything like a *design* yet (I mean, I'm not even sure if it makes sense to encode even a vague guess at linenos in a backtrace section: it's not worth introducing them just for this, but if we might need them *anyway*, this could serve as another user: it seems unlikely but it might be true, so I'll keep this potential usecase in mind when I get back to the backtrace stuff).
Actually printing the warnings would still add repeated code at every locus, but at least not repeated big strings. Maybe, possibly, an improvement...