[go: up one dir, main page]

|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

systemd. dbus, udev, etc are sometimes a really bad idea

systemd. dbus, udev, etc are sometimes a really bad idea

Posted May 5, 2016 10:38 UTC (Thu) by pizza (subscriber, #46)
In reply to: systemd. dbus, udev, etc are sometimes a really bad idea by khim
Parent article: Devuan Jessie beta released

What do any of those examples have to do with an attack that requires *physical* access to your firewall? And, going back to my point, an attack that, in order to be successful, requires knowledge only obtainable if you have already completely compromised everything already?


to post comments

systemd. dbus, udev, etc are sometimes a really bad idea

Posted May 5, 2016 19:45 UTC (Thu) by dlang (guest, #313) [Link]

so you say that people should not be able to defend themselves against an attach scenario that you deem invalid.

Why should your judgement trump everyone else's?


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds