How 3.6 nearly broke PostgreSQL

Posted Oct 3, 2012 13:31 UTC (Wed) by and (guest, #2883)
In reply to: How 3.6 nearly broke PostgreSQL by ajb
Parent article: How 3.6 nearly broke PostgreSQL

I understood that approach differently: If core A has B as its buddy, B's buddy does not necessarily need to be A. This would imply kind of a ring buffer of buddies within the package (A->B->C->D->A)...