[go: up one dir, main page]

|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

What happened to disk performance in 2.6.39

What happened to disk performance in 2.6.39

Posted Feb 2, 2012 10:08 UTC (Thu) by jezuch (subscriber, #52988)
Parent article: What happened to disk performance in 2.6.39

I've just run a test and my SSD can read at full speed. I'm running 3.2.2 so I guess the fix is already included in at least one stable release?

Also, it is interesting that it took so long to discover this problem. Does that mean that people don't really care about speed of sequential file access? :) [Well, I know that I do care more about random access performance, that's why I bought the SSD in the first place. And I also know that sequential read performance used to be a major selling point for manufacturers of drives with horrendous random access performance.]


to post comments

What happened to disk performance in 2.6.39

Posted Feb 2, 2012 14:13 UTC (Thu) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link]

Did you test with large reads? That is the failure case. If you do smaller operations, the plug gets pulled between them.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds