Pull requests with signed tags

Posted Dec 22, 2011 12:45 UTC (Thu) by cesarb (subscriber, #6266)
Parent article: Pull requests with signed tags

Why does this remind me of Monotone?

to post comments

Pull requests with signed tags

Posted Dec 23, 2011 5:17 UTC (Fri) by flewellyn (subscriber, #5047) [Link] (1 responses)

Probably no accident. As I recall, Monotone was the existing FOSS distributed version control system that was closest to what Linus was looking for, post-BK. Only reason they didn't go with it was performance. Featurewise, it was what they wanted.

So, if they implement Monotoneish features in Git, it only makes sense.

Pull requests with signed tags

Posted Dec 25, 2011 19:05 UTC (Sun) by jnareb (subscriber, #46500) [Link]

Probably no accident. As I recall, Monotone was the existing FOSS distributed version control system that was closest to what Linus was looking for, post-BK. Only reason they didn't go with it was performance. Featurewise, it was what they wanted.
So, if they implement Monotoneish features in Git, it only makes sense.

From what I remember the performace thing was a temporary setback (a regression), which unfortunately hit at the time Linus was examining existing OSS DVCS for Linux kernel after BitKeeper fiasco...

...but from what I remember (check GitHistory page on Git Wiki - it is up, but not yet 100% working correctly) that Linus didn't like Monotone signing of all commits; that is why in Git only tags, and now merges / merge sides are signed.

P.S. When IPsec was asking on git mailing list if it would be possible to sign every commit, they were pointed to Monotone instead ;-)