A Periodic Table of password managers

Posted Nov 10, 2011 16:37 UTC (Thu) by drag (guest, #31333)
In reply to: A Periodic Table of password managers by danielpf
Parent article: A Periodic Table of password managers

If you want to take that approach then the best place to keep your passwords is written down on a pad of paper.

That way is completely and 100% totally impervious to all remote attackers.

The brain makes a notorious poor place to store passwords. It has very limited store, high levels of data corruption, and performance/recall limitations. It's a highly optimized storage medium not well suited to arbitrary strings.

to post comments

A Periodic Table of password managers

Posted Nov 10, 2011 19:30 UTC (Thu) by danielpf (guest, #4723) [Link] (4 responses)

Anyway you must at least assume that your brain is able to remember that you wrote down the passwords on the pad of paper, and where the pad was stored, without forgetting that this brain is going to use a computer.

So a minimally functioning brain can be assumed.

Now what is required to the brain is not much more elaborated than that.
From the list of partial passwords, say written on paper, but not necessarily, you modify the partial passwords with a simple rule, like:
- adding your pet name to the written down partial passwords (not very good actually), better
- replacing the last 3 characters with the next ones in the alphabet, or
- swapping the odd and even positioned characters,
- etc.
Something sufficiently simple but personal your brain will keep with quasi certainty. Something also that doesn't reveal some obvious structure in the password in case someone has access to a full password (thus the pet name addition is not very good on this regard).

A Periodic Table of password managers

Posted Nov 11, 2011 4:17 UTC (Fri) by drag (guest, #31333) [Link] (3 responses)

> So a minimally functioning brain can be assumed.

I doesn't matter how functional your brain is, it sucks at remembering arbitrary strings. Unless you are some sort of idiot savant.

> Now what is required to the brain is not much more elaborated than that.

No what is required for the brain is to do something it's not designed for.

> From the list of partial passwords, say written on paper, but not necessarily, you modify the partial passwords with a simple rule, like:
> - adding your pet name to the written down partial passwords (not very good actually), better
> - replacing the last 3 characters with the next ones in the alphabet, or
> - swapping the odd and even positioned characters,
> - etc.

None of that is very good, actually.

I have 5 sets of passwords I need to memorize for work.
I need a unique password for each website I need account for. That is probably about 10 or 15 different websites.
They include:
My bank
My mortgage company
My house insurance company
My car insurance company
My credit card
Power company
The power company for my rental
The water and sewage company for my house
The water and sewage company for my rental.
this website
gmail
some other websites.

and a few other dozens websites I use for various reasons. A lot of them I very rarely use, but when I need to use them it's somewhat important.

You tell me you can memorize all these and keep them straight by just swapping out pet names or doing random 3 letter word combinations. I have probably about 30 different passwords that need to be kept track of. A average person who uses the internet for bills and social media stuff probably has at least 15 accounts they need to keep track of.

What you are suggesting is all incredibly bad advice that will lead to a forgotten passwords, lots of password recoveries, lots of phone calls to the help desk at work. People will invariably choose to use shorter and simpler passwords and using the same passwords over and over again. Even if they are smart and try to use a good policy it will just end up punishing them and pushing them towards bad password management habits.

This sort of really bad advice that is repeated over and over again is exactly why people get their crap broken into. This contributed to why Debian got hacked. Fedora got hacked. Kernel.org got hacked. This is why people were able to gain access to source code repositories and key signing servers and all sorts of sensitive places like that. 90 times out of a 100 it is not a software vulnerability; it's because some goofball used a password to access a system that was hacked or should not of been trusted and they used the same password, or variation of it, on something that was actually important or their own workstation (and allowed ssh access from the internet).

People _should_
- Use unique passwords, _always_.
- Use very long passwords. Minimal 8 letters. Better of with 16, better off with 32, etc.
- Use random passwords.
- Passwords not based on favorite names or important dates or favorite teams, etc
- Passwords NOT based on words or misspelling of words. Swapping around letters is NOT useful. Substituting special characters for letters is NOT useful. Tacking on numbers to the end of words is NOT useful. These increase the difficulty of accurately remembering passwords massively while at the same time only trivially more difficult for a attacker to brute force or guess.

Trying to keep that straight in your head is very counter productive. It's better to not even try. Once you give up the need to try to memorize passwords then using proper passwords is massively easier.

> """able to remember that you wrote down the passwords on the pad of paper"""

Now compare all that to something that humans are actually very good at like:

"Were did I leave my wallet?"
"Were are my car keys?"
"Which drawer in my desk did I leave my password book in?"

If you don't know these then it's very easy to find out answers relatively quickly with usually minimal work.

Now if you don't use your online bank account but once every 3 or 4 months to check your balance... what are the chances you'll be able to recall a password that is _actually_secure_?

I understand a paper pad is not suitable for all purposes and is vulnerable to theft. Password managers are almost as good.

For Linux users something that is simple would be a LUKS encrypted USB key or something like that to store a text file of passwords or something like that. Real password managers are probably better, as long as you know how they function and keep their 'vaults' backed up to multiple systems. Encrypted files generally can be trusted so even if you back your password vaults up to insecure systems, you will be OK as long as you don't actually try to access their contents on those systems.

Some websites I use crap passwords because I am lazy. This is very hard to avoid.

But when I am doing good I always use passwords like this:

wee4eev1zaej,ah7EiCh
qui0hoh7OHaa<g1aetae
dae\Pae9aengo7OoPia:
wieYooNgoa1aijee[Gie
il2Sie2Jie1aevoh$soo
Xith7iez5ca,uf4eephu
za'es1ki5ooSh1xie1va
Aexu5ji{h1ahdahpo2ti
athae4Cemae9zoh+hiev
aQuia!xie5lef{i0Ooth

That is randomly generated stuff by using the 'pwgen' command, because creating new passwords is irritating and time consuming. In this case it was "pwgen -c1y 20 10" When I feel like being paranoid I won't even trust pwgen output.

For passwords that I need to recall on a continious basis, which is about 2-3 that I absolutely use on a daily basis I can memorize something strings like above. After using a password like that for a few weeks in situations were I must use it over and over and over again I can actually recall it much better using muscle memory then I can with just thinking about it. It's a bit silly feeling to have to sit down and close my eyes and type a password out to gedit to be able to recover it, but it is not atypical.

But lately I've been basing passwords on random strings of english words that end up about 20-30 characters long, for passwords I must use very often. No intentional mispellings or '7331' speak or any of that nonsense. They take a long time to type out, but accuracy increased massively and now I have to make less phone calls to unlock my accounts. For commonly used passwords changing them every month or two is critical.

(by-the-way: password lock-out policies are asinine. It amazes me that they don't understand that a person with simple shell script and a list of usernames can trivially perform a DOS attack on any major corporation that uses a password lock-out policy.. So irritating.)

A Periodic Table of password managers

Posted Nov 12, 2011 3:34 UTC (Sat) by djao (guest, #4263) [Link]

I don't think you properly understood the original proposal.

You have about 30 different passwords to keep track of. That's about average. You seem to be in favor of writing them down, whether on a pad of paper or in a password manager. That's quite understandable.

The problem is that, if someone malicious gets that piece of paper or breaks into your password manager, then they have EVERYTHING. The proposed countermeasure is to apply a single, simple, fixed, easy to remember, and easily reversible transformation to each password in your list. In other words, what you write down in your list is not your "real" password. Instead your real password is some simple (always the same) variation upon what is written down.

You would not write down the details of what this transformation is. You have to remember it in your head. But you only have to remember this one single simple rule. The argument is that remembering this one thing is not much harder than remembering the passphrase to your password manager, or the location of your paper pad. The benefit is that if an adversary succeeds in obtaining your list of passwords, they don't automatically get everything.

Nobody is suggesting that you memorize 30 different passwords or 30 different rules.

A Periodic Table of password managers

Posted Nov 12, 2011 22:00 UTC (Sat) by mgedmin (guest, #34497) [Link] (1 responses)

Diceware is good for generating random but easy to remember passphrases. It's basically a world list with some instructions about picking up a number of words by using physical dice as a random number generator, and some calculations how many words you need for a given password strength.

A Periodic Table of password managers

Posted Nov 17, 2011 15:04 UTC (Thu) by mmendez (subscriber, #81435) [Link]

I have been using a Firefox addon called passwordmaker for a few years. It hashes a 'master password', that you keep in your head, along with some salts (domain name, prefix modifiers ...) and generates passwords using a list of characters.

So the password is never stored in any format. If someone were to grab the password configuration they would still need to know your 'master password', which being a single/often used password should be easy to remember even if it is complex.