[go: up one dir, main page]

|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Filesystem hierarchy standard - questions about /boot

Filesystem hierarchy standard - questions about /boot

Posted May 6, 2011 9:05 UTC (Fri) by anselm (subscriber, #2796)
In reply to: Filesystem hierarchy standard - questions about /boot by petegn
Parent article: Filesystem hierarchy standard 3.0 process begins

Nothing in the FHS says that /boot must be on its own partition. Under some circumstances this is unavoidable (e.g., with some LVM and/or encryption setups), and historically it used to be necessary on various machines due to BIOS limitations. However there is nothing wrong in principle with having /boot on the root file system along with /etc, /bin and so on, just as there is nothing wrong with having it on its own partition. The FHS makes no stipulation either way.


to post comments

Filesystem hierarchy standard - questions about /boot

Posted May 6, 2011 22:27 UTC (Fri) by Wol (subscriber, #4433) [Link]

And on one of my systems I have doze on hda, linux on hdb, grub as my bootloader, and I couldn't get an hdb /boot to work ...

Mind you, I get the impression from the OP that's okay because / and /boot are on different hard drives.

Cheers,
Wol


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds