UMSDOS?

UMSDOS?

Posted Mar 3, 2009 4:05 UTC (Tue) by eru (subscriber, #2753)
In reply to: That would appear to work by JoeBuck
Parent article: Third time is the charm?

(any table you could come up with would be a "second directory entry").

Doesn't the old UMSDOS extension in Linux FAT implementation then qualify as prior art? If Wikipedia is correct, it was started in 1992 and first appeared on the net in 1994 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umsdos).

---

to post comments

UMSDOS?

Posted Mar 4, 2009 6:29 UTC (Wed) by hawk (guest, #3195) [Link]

Now, THAT would be something...

...If the very system they are attacking contains the prior art, and in the form of an extension for that very same file system.