Software suspend - again

Posted Feb 9, 2006 18:53 UTC (Thu) by khim (subscriber, #9252)
In reply to: Software suspend - again by dambacher
Parent article: Software suspend - again

It would be so simple to just do two kconfig options for either suspend code and a 3rd for kexe/kdump/(kresume?)

If that's "so simple" then why did you never submit such patch to LKML ? Or have I missed it ? How big and intrusive was your patch ?

We have choice in many other places of the kernel (see schedulers), why not with the suspend code?

Guess. You know the basics:
1. If kernel developers can offer end-users choice without huge hassle they tend to do this.
2. They never offered such choice in regard to suspend code.
That's more then enough information to deduce correct answer...