- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:12:00 +0200
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Jonathan Rees wrote:
>
> Not sure who to tell about this now, but it does seem to bear on our
> discussion of CURIE/URI confusion.
>
> Quoth http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#relValues :
>
> @rel a whitespace separated list of CURIEs, used for expressing
> relationships between two resources ('predicates' in RDF terminology);
>
> Quoth http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02.txt :
> Link = "Link" ":" #("<" URI-Reference ">" *( ";" link-param ) )
> link-param = ( ( "rel" "=" relationship ) | ...
> relationship = URI-Reference | ...
> I was under the impression that the founding fathers meant for Link: and
> <link> to be compatible. We seem to have lost that possibility now, due
> to lack of coordination between groups working independently on
> extensions to HTTP and XHTML.
Yes, that's a problem that should be fixed (in rdfa).
BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2008 18:12:51 UTC