- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:52:38 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello,
The agenda for the 15 July 2002 TAG teleconf is available
as HTML [1] and text below.
- Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/15-tag
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
-------------------------------------------------------------
[1]W3C [2]| TAG | Previous: [3]8 Jul | Next: 22 July
[1] http://www.w3.org/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/08-tag-summary
Agenda for 15 July 2002 TAG teleconference
Nearby: [4]Teleconference details · [5]issues list · [6]www-tag
archive
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
[5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.
1. Administrative (15min)
1. Confirm scribe
2. Roll call. Regrets: CL
3. Accept this [7]agenda
4. Next meeting? Proposed 22 July.
5. Accept [8]8 July minutes
6. Confirm status of [9]completed actions
7. Confirm status of [10]withdrawn actions [None]
[7] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/08-tag
[8] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/08-tag-summary
1.2 Completed actions?
1. IJ: Find out whether the W3C Comm Team expects to have a
publishing moratorium in August. (Awaiting reply).
2. Technical (75min)
2.1 Findings in progress, architecture document (45min)
See also: [11]findings.
1. Architecture document
1. ACTION TBL [12]2002/05/05: Negotiate more of IJ time
for arch
doc
2. ACTION RF 2002/06/24: Write a paragraph on technical and
political aspects of URIs and URI References.
3. Action TB, DC 2002/07/08: Propose text for section 1.1 (URI
Schemes)
4. Action CL 2002/07/08: Propose text for section 2 (Formats).
Deadline 30 July.
5. Action DC 2002/07/08: Ask Michael Mealing when IETF decided
not to use HTTP URis to name protocols.
6. Action IJ 2002/07/08: Produce WD of Arch Doc. Deadline 30
August.
2. [13]Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use.
+ Action PC 2002/07/08: Propose alternative wording for
finding
regarding IANA registration. Refer to "[14]How to
Register a
Media Type with IANA (for the IETF tree) "
3. [15]Qnames as identifiers
1. Action NW 2002/06/24: Follow up on [16]Rick Jelliffe
comments/proposal.
4. [17]Consistency of Formatting Property Names, Values, and
Semantics
+ Status of this finding after NW responds to
[18]comments from
Hakon?
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0505-agenda#Session
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime
[14] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype
[15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids.html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0126
[17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/formatting-properties
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0120.html
2.2 Priority issues (30min)
1. [19]httpRange-14: Need to make progress here to advance in Arch
Document.
2. [20]uriMediaType-9: Status of negotiation with IETF? See
[21]message from DanC.
+ Action TBL: Get a reply from the IETF on the TAG finding.
3. RFC3023Charset-21:
+ Action CL: Send copy of information sent to tag regarding
[22]RFC3023Charset-21 to www-tag.
4. Status of [23]URIEquivalence-15. Relation to Character Model of
the Web (chapter 4)? See text from TimBL on [24]URI
canonicalization and [25]email from Martin in particular.
5. Status of discussions with WSA WG about SOAP/WSDL/GET/Query
strings?
+ ACTION DO 2002/06/24: Contact WSDL WG about this issue
(bindings, query strings and schemas) to ensure that
it's on
their radar. See [26]discussions from 24 Jun TAG teleconf.
6. [27]RFC3023Charset-21
+ ACTION CL [28]2002/6/03: Send [29]writeup on this issue to
www-tag.
7. augmentedInfoset-22:
+ [30]Request from Tim Bray to decide this issue
(disposition =
closed). Pushback from Simon St. Laurent.
+ ACTION DC 2002/06/17: Talk to XML Schema WG about PSVI.
Report to tag, who expects to decide whether to add as an
issue next week. DanC has sent email; awaiting reply
from XML
Scheme WG.
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#httpRange-14
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#uriMediaType-9
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Jun/0095.html
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#RFC3023Charset-21
[23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#URIEquivalence-15
[24] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#canonicalization
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002May/0161
[26] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/24-tag-summary.html#wsa-get
[27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#RFC3023Charset-21
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0019.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Jun/0090.html
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0159.html
2.3 New issues?
1. Bad practice: Overriding HTTP content-type with a URI
reference.[31]See email from TBL.
2. "Deep linking illegal" bad practice? See [32]email from Tim
Bray.
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0117.html
[32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0118.html
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs, for TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2002/07/11 14:55:50 $
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 11:55:39 UTC