[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Anomalous triple gauge couplings in the effective field theory approach at the LHC

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 February 2017
  • Volume 2017, article number 115, (2017)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Anomalous triple gauge couplings in the effective field theory approach at the LHC
Download PDF
  • Adam Falkowski1,
  • Martín González-Alonso2,
  • Admir Greljo3,4,
  • David Marzocca3 &
  • …
  • Minho Son5 
  • 820 Accesses

  • 83 Citations

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

We discuss how to perform consistent extractions of anomalous triple gauge couplings (aTGC) from electroweak boson pair production at the LHC in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT). After recasting recent ATLAS and CMS searches in pp → W Z(W W ) → ℓ′νℓ+ℓ−(νℓ) channels, we find that: (a) working consistently at order Λ−2 in the SMEFT expansion the existing aTGC bounds from Higgs and LEP-2 data are not improved, (b) the strong limits quoted by the experimental collaborations are due to the partial Λ−4 corrections (dimension-6 squared contributions). Using helicity selection rule arguments we are able to explain the suppression in some of the interference terms, and discuss conditions on New Physics (NP) models that can benefit from such LHC analyses. Furthermore, standard analyses assume implicitly a quite large NP scale, an assumption that can be relaxed by imposing cuts on the underlying scale of the process (\( \sqrt{\widehat{s}} \)). In practice, we find almost no correlation between \( \sqrt{\widehat{s}} \) and the experimentally accessible quantities, which complicates the SMEFT interpretation. Nevertheless, we provide a method to set (conservative) aTGC bounds in this situation, and recast the present searches accordingly. Finally, we introduce a simple NP model for aTGC to compare the bounds obtained directly in the model with those from the SMEFT analysis.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Direct and indirect signals of natural composite Higgs models

Article Open access 19 January 2016

Composite Higgs and leptoquarks from a simple group

Article Open access 22 March 2019

Diboson at the LHC vs LEP

Article Open access 05 March 2019

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Elementary Particles, Quantum Field Theory
  • Matter-Antimatter Interactions
  • Particle Physics
  • Theoretical Nuclear Physics
  • Theoretical Particle Physics
  • Quantum Electrodynamics, Relativistic and Many-body Calculations
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. A. Falkowski and F. Riva, Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators, JHEP 02 (2015) 039 [arXiv:1411.0669] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Efrati, A. Falkowski and Y. Soreq, Electroweak constraints on flavorful effective theories, JHEP 07 (2015) 018 [arXiv:1503.07872] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. De Rujula, M.B. Gavela, P. Hernández and E. Masso, The selfcouplings of vector bosons: does LEP-1 obviate LEP-2?, Nucl. Phys. B 384 (1992) 3 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Hagiwara, S. Ishihara, R. Szalapski and D. Zeppenfeld, Low-energy effects of new interactions in the electroweak boson sector, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2182 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP 06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE].

  7. A. Falkowski, Higgs Basis: Proposal for an EFT basis choice for LHC HXSWG, LHCHXSWG-INT-2015-001 (2015).

  8. LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector, arXiv:1610.07922 [INSPIRE].

  9. R.S. Gupta, A. Pomarol and F. Riva, BSM primary effects, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 035001 [arXiv:1405.0181] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the ultimate SM fit to close in on Higgs physics, JHEP 01 (2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Trott, On the consistent use of constructed observables, JHEP 02 (2015) 046 [arXiv:1409.7605] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. DELPHI, OPAL, LEP Electroweak, ALEPH, L3 collaboration, S. Schael et al., Electroweak measurements in electron-positron collisions at W-boson-pair energies at LEP, Phys. Rept. 532 (2013) 119 [arXiv:1302.3415] [INSPIRE].

  13. L. Berthier, M. Bjørn and M. Trott, Incorporating doubly resonant W ± data in a global fit of SMEFT parameters to lift flat directions, JHEP 09 (2016) 157 [arXiv:1606.06693] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Corbett, O.J.P. É boli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Determining triple gauge boson couplings from Higgs data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 011801 [arXiv:1304.1151] [INSPIRE].

  15. B. Dumont, S. Fichet and G. von Gersdorff, A bayesian view of the Higgs sector with higher dimensional operators, JHEP 07 (2013) 065 [arXiv:1304.3369] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Masso, An effective guide to beyond the standard model physics, JHEP 10 (2014) 128 [arXiv:1406.6376] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, Complete Higgs sector constraints on dimension-6 operators, JHEP 07 (2014) 036 [arXiv:1404.3667] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, The effective standard model after LHC Run I, JHEP 03 (2015) 157 [arXiv:1410.7703] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Falkowski, M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo and D. Marzocca, Global constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings in effective field theory approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 011801 [arXiv:1508.00581] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of total and differential W + W − production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector and limits on anomalous triple-gauge-boson couplings, JHEP 09 (2016) 029 [arXiv:1603.01702] [INSPIRE].

  21. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the W + W − cross section in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV and limits on anomalous gauge couplings, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 401 [arXiv:1507.03268] [INSPIRE].

  22. CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Measurement of the W Z cross section and triple gauge couplings in \( p\overline{p} \) collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=1.96 \) TeV, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 031104 [arXiv:1202.6629] [INSPIRE].

  23. D0 collaboration, V.M. Abazov et al., Limits on anomalous trilinear gauge boson couplings from W W , W Z and W γ production in \( p\overline{p} \) collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=1.96 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2012) 451 [arXiv:1208.5458] [INSPIRE].

  24. M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, S. Pozzorini, D. Rathlev and M. Wiesemann, W + W − production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD, JHEP 08 (2016) 140 [arXiv:1605.02716] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, D. Rathlev and M. Wiesemann, W ± Z production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD, Phys. Lett. B 761 (2016) 179 [arXiv:1604.08576] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Butter, O.J.P. É boli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, T. Plehn and M. Rauch, The gauge-Higgs legacy of the LHC Run I, JHEP 07 (2016) 152 [arXiv:1604.03105] [INSPIRE].

  27. A. Azatov, R. Contino, C.S. Machado and F. Riva, Helicity selection rules and non-interference for BSM amplitudes, arXiv:1607.05236 [INSPIRE].

  28. A. Biekötter, A. Knochel, M. Krämer, D. Liu and F. Riva, Vices and virtues of Higgs effective field theories at large energy, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 055029 [arXiv:1406.7320] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. R. Contino, A. Falkowski, F. Goertz, C. Grojean and F. Riva, On the validity of the effective field theory approach to SM precision tests, JHEP 07 (2016) 144 [arXiv:1604.06444] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Liu, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and F. Riva, Patterns of strong coupling for LHC searches, JHEP 11 (2016) 141 [arXiv:1603.03064] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. ATLAS collaboration, Measurements of W ± Z production cross sections in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector and limits on anomalous gauge boson self-couplings, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 092004 [arXiv:1603.02151] [INSPIRE].

  32. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the W ± Z boson pair-production cross section in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=13 \) TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1606.04017] [INSPIRE].

  33. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of W Z production in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2173 [arXiv:1208.1390] [INSPIRE].

  34. D. Racco, A. Wulzer and F. Zwirner, Robust collider limits on heavy-mediator Dark Matter, JHEP 05 (2015) 009 [arXiv:1502.04701] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. C. Cheung and C.-H. Shen, Nonrenormalization theorems without supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 071601 [arXiv:1505.01844] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. CMS collaboration, Measurement of W Z production rate, CMS-PAS-SMP-12-006 (2012).

  37. A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].

  38. C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer and T. Reiter, UFO — The Universal FeynRules Output, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 1201 [arXiv:1108.2040] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. T. Sjöstrand et al., An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].

  41. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. A. Greljo, G. Isidori, J.M. Lindert and D. Marzocca, Pseudo-observables in electroweak Higgs production, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 158 [arXiv:1512.06135] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. A. Azatov, J. Elias-Miro, Y. Reyimuaji and E. Venturini, work in progress.

  44. A. Azatov, SM/BSM interference pattern, talk given at BSM faces LHC Run-2 realities workshop, September 12-16, DESY, Hamburg, Germany (2016).

  45. N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen and H. Georgi, (De)constructing dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 4757 [hep-th/0104005] [INSPIRE].

  46. D.B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, SU(2) × U(1) breaking by vacuum misalignment, Phys. Lett. 136B (1984) 183 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang, Scattering amplitudes, arXiv:1308.1697 [INSPIRE].

  48. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, Holomorphy without supersymmetry in the standard model effective field theory, Phys. Lett. B 739 (2014) 95 [arXiv:1409.0868] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa and A. Pomarol, One-loop non-renormalization results in EFTs, Phys. Lett. B 747 (2015) 272 [arXiv:1412.7151] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Effective Lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP 07 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1303.3876] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, Bat. 210, Université Paris-Sud, 91405, Orsay, France

    Adam Falkowski

  2. IPN de Lyon/CNRS, Universite Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France

    Martín González-Alonso

  3. Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, CH-8057, Zürich, Switzerland

    Admir Greljo & David Marzocca

  4. Faculty of Science, University of Sarajevo, Zmaja od Bosne 33-35, 71000, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Admir Greljo

  5. Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea

    Minho Son

Authors
  1. Adam Falkowski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martín González-Alonso
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Admir Greljo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Marzocca
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Minho Son
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martín González-Alonso.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1609.06312

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Falkowski, A., González-Alonso, M., Greljo, A. et al. Anomalous triple gauge couplings in the effective field theory approach at the LHC. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 115 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2017)115

Download citation

  • Received: 10 October 2016

  • Revised: 17 January 2017

  • Accepted: 07 February 2017

  • Published: 22 February 2017

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2017)115

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Beyond Standard Model
  • Effective field theories
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature