Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a common form of dementia characterized by memory loss, cognitive and linguistic abilities declining and self-care capabilities diminishment. With the aging population globally, AD poses a significant threat to public health. Current treatments for AD aim to alleviate symptoms and slow down disease progression, but due to the limited understanding of underlying disease mechanisms, AD is still impossible to be cured yet. In recent years, there has been an exponential growth in exosome-related research because of their excellent biocompatibility ability, loading capacity and cellular internalization, making exosome to be one of the hotspots and a promising strategy in AD therapy research. This comprehensive review systematically explores the potential roles of various exosome-based nanotherapeutic strategy in AD treatment, with a particular focus on their specific biological mechanisms of action. Firstly, we elaborated on the pathological mechanisms of AD formation as well as the mechanisms related to the formation, secretion and function of exosome. Additionally, we highlighted the research progress in the development of exosome-based nanotherapeutic strategies for AD treatment and their corresponding biological mechanisms. Furthermore, we delved into the challenges and opportunities these strategies facing in clinical application. Looking forward to future research directions and trends, our review aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding and guidance with the application of exosome in AD treatment. Exosome-based nanotherapeutic strategies, as a new therapeutic approach, have opened up new possibilities for the treatment of AD and brought new light to patients.
Graphical abstract
Schematic diagram of exosome-based nanotherapy strategies for the treatment of AD. It can be roughly classified as: exosomes-based methods treating AD and bioengineered exosomes for the treatment of AD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorders. It is expected that there will be 152 million AD cases worldwide by 2050 due to population aging [1]. In terms of clinical manifestation, AD is characterized by memory and cognition decline, with its etiology yet to be fully elucidated [2]. At present, the widely accepted hypotheses of the pathogenesis of AD mainly include amyloid protein deposition, abnormal phosphorylation of Tau protein, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, etc. [2]. Among these assumptions, amyloid deposition hypothesis is one of the most concerned one at present. This hypothesis suggests that the main cause of AD is the abnormal deposition of amyloid beta proteins (Aβ) forming plaques in the brain, which is thought to be toxic to neurons, resulting in neuronal damage and death. Clinically, the treatment for AD mainly targets symptom management rather than the pathological processes of neurodegeneration. So far, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved only seven drugs/drug combinations, including Aducanumab, Donepezil, Galantamine, Livastine, Memantine, Lyca-resistant mab and the combination of Memantine and Donepezil [3], which can only partially improve symptoms of AD and are limited by higher costs and more side effects. In addition, the onset and progression of AD is latent, and by the time most patients seek medical attention, neurons have been lost for decades, and drug therapy can only be used for patients in the early and middle stages, so it is unlikely that most patients in the middle and late stages will achieve the desired effect through the corresponding drug treatment [4]. Surgical treatment (deep brain electrode stimulation) can also improve cognitive function in some AD patients, but surgical risks and high costs limit its wide application in clinical practice [5, 6]. Therefore, new treatment strategies for AD are urgently needed to meet clinical needs.
In recent year, researchers have used a variety of methods (such as monoclonal antibodies, inhibitors, antagonists, etc.) to develop effective AD treatments to improve patients' cognitive function and life quality [7]. However, these drugs are not targeted and have significant side effects. Besides, with the advancement of nanotechnology, it is possible to achieve more precise treatment by using nanoparticles (NPs) (such as MOFs, nano-polymers, liposomes, etc.) to deliver therapeutic drugs to the lesion site. However, these nanomaterials may trigger an immune response and their delivery targeting accuracy is not high [8]. It is noteworthy that exosomes are tiny vesicles about 30-150 nm in diameter that are formed by the formation of endosomes, containing biomolecules such as proteins, RNAs and lipids, which can effectively evade the mononuclear phagocytosis system [9]. Besides, exosomes used for therapeutic purposes are mainly derived from human cell lines, containing several unique advantages compared to NPs of non-human origin [10]. For example, (1) exosomes generally exhibit the same tropism as their parent cells [11,12,13,14], a property that facilitates for their research and development as therapeutic agents. For instance, macrophages are key immune cells in the body that are naturally recruited to inflammation-prone sites (Fig. 1). Moreover, exosomes derived from macrophages may accumulate in the chronically inflamed brains of patients with neurodegenerative diseases due to the inflammation-guided chemotaxis (Fig. 2A) [15, 16]. Additionally, Nisim et al. also found that exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells could target and accumulate in certain regions of the brains of pathological-related mouse model [17]. Biocompatibility can greatly reduce drug side effects and increase their retention time in the human circulatory system. Membrane surface programming provides great possibilities for drug loading and exosome engineering editing [11, 12]. In addition, the blood–brain barrier (BBB), as the physiological barrier formed by the blood vessels, has the unique property of precisely controlling the molecules that enter the central nervous system (CNS), which considered to be one of the obstacles to effective treatment of AD (Fig. 3). However, exosomes can efficiently cross the BBB for either targeted or untargeted drug delivery, thereby reducing the dose required to achieve therapeutic effects [12].
Schematic diagram of exosome-based nanotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of AD. It can be roughly classified as: a exosomes of various nerve cells are used to improve AD. b Exosomes used as load-related therapeutics to improve AD. c Exosomes should be engineered to have the ability to target nerve cells and load therapeutic drugs
Schematic illustration of different sources of mesenchymal stem cells and their properties of importance in AD treatment along with exosomes (A). Biogenetic process of exosomes (B) and composition of exosomes (C) [16]. Schematic diagram of possible pathologic mechanisms in the development and progression of AD (D)
In this study, we systematically investigated the potential therapeutic roles of exosome-based nanotherapeutic strategies in the AD treatment, with a particular focus on the specific biological mechanisms underlying their efficacy. Initially, we delineated the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the formation of AD. Subsequently, we provided a detailed account of the mechanisms related to the biogenesis, secretion and functions of exosomes. Furthermore, we summarized the research progresses in the application of exosomes for the AD treatment, as well as the development of exosome-based nanotherapeutic strategies and their underlying biological mechanisms. Finally, we explored the challenges and opportunities associated with their clinical application. Looking forward to future research directions and trends, this comprehensive analysis aims to provide a more in-depth understanding and guidance for the application of exosomes in the AD treatment.
2 An overview of the pathogenic mechanism of Alzheimer's disease
Alzheimer's disease, commonly referred to be senile dementia, is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cognitive decline, predominantly affecting the cognitive faculties of the elderly [18]. The etiology of AD remains to be elucidated [19]. Nonetheless, based on extant theories, the putative pathogenic mechanisms are as follows (Fig. 4).
2.1 Amyloid deposition
The amyloid precursor protein (APP) is a transmembrane protein present on the surface of neurons and other cell membranes [20]. Its metabolic pathway involves various proteases, including α-secretase, β-secretase (BACE1) and γ-secretase [21]. In normal physiological processes, APP is predominantly cleaved via the α-secretase pathway, yielding a soluble extracellular fragment (sAPPα) and an intracellular fragment, a process that does not generate Aβ [22]. However, in the pathophysiology of AD, APP is also cleaved via the β-secretase pathway, producing a larger membrane-bound fragment (C99) and a smaller soluble extracellular fragment (sAPPβ) [23]. Then, C99 is subsequently cleaved by the γ-secretase complex, which is a multiprotein complex tasked with cleaving the transmembrane domain of APP, releasing Aβ and an intracellular domain (AICD) [24]. The cleavage sites of the γ-secretase are variable, producing Aβ of different lengths, among which Aβ42 is the most amyloidogenic form [25]. Finally, the formation of amyloid plaques is a complex multistep process involving the generation, aggregation and deposition of Aβ, which in turn interferes with synaptic function and elicits neuronal damage. Subsequently, the resulting Aβ is released outside the cell, accumulating in brain tissue and forming oligomers and fibers through self-assembly. As Aβ continues to accumulate they will further aggregate to form larger plaques called amyloid plaques [26]. Moreover, pathological states such as oxidative stress and inflammation may also facilitate Aβ aggregation and amyloid plaques formation [27]. Certain genetic variants, including mutations in the APP and BACE1 genes, can increase Aβ production or decrease its clearance [28, 29].
2.2 Tau protein aggregation
Tau protein, as a microtubule-associated protein, is predominantly found within the axons of neurons [30]. Its main function is to promote and maintain the stability of microtubules, promote the formation of neuronal cytoskeleton and thus support the morphology and transport of neurons [31]. Under normal physiological conditions, Tau protein can be phosphorylated by various kinases, a reversible process that is essential for its proper function [32]. However, in neurodegenerative diseases such as AD, the phosphorylation of Tau protein is dysregulated, leading to hyperphosphorylation, which in turn compromises its ability to bind with microtubules and maintain their stability. Then, hyperphosphorylated Tau protein begins to aggregate and forms paired helical filaments (PHFs), the primary constituent of neurofibrillary tangles in AD [33]. These PHFs further aggregate into larger structures called Tau tangles, which become entangled within neurons, impeding normal neuronal function and axoplasmic transport [34]. It's worth noting that Tau protein undergoes alternative splicing in different neurons to produce various isoforms, and abnormal splicing can lead to an increase in the proportion of harmful isomers, thus promoting the formation of tangles [35]. Besides, certain genetic mutations, such as those in the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene, can directly affect the structure and function of Tau protein, making it more likely to form tangles [36]. Moreover, an imbalance in intracellular calcium concentrations can lead to abnormal phosphorylation of Tau protein, thereby promoting tangles aggregation.
2.3 Mitochondrial dysfunction
Mitochondria, often considered as the powerhouses of the cell, is responsible for generating adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which is the currency of cellular energy. Additionally, mitochondria is instrumental in regulating intracellular calcium levels, maintaining redox balance and facilitating apoptosis [37]. In AD, mitochondrial energy metabolism is disturbed, resulting in diminished production of ATP. This impairment may be associated with the dysfunction of the mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes, especially the reduced activity of Complex I and Complex III [38]. Dysfunctional energy metabolism impedes the ability of neurons to maintain normal physiological activities, thereby impacting cognitive function. Besides, mitochondria are the main source of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can damage mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), proteins and lipids, exacerbating mitochondrial dysfunction [37, 39]. Among them, mtDNA is more susceptible to ROS-induced damage than nuclear DNA, and such damage can impair the synthesis of respiratory chain proteins, affecting energy metabolism [40]. In addition, the accumulation of mutations in mtDNA may also lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, as these mutations can compromise the function of respiratory chain components encoded by mitochondrial genes. Moreover, mitophagy, the process by which cells clear damaged or dysfunctional mitochondria, plays a crucial role [41]. Under normal circumstances, cells possess an antioxidant system to neutralize these radicals. However, in the course of AD, the mitochondrial antioxidant defenses are disrupted, leading to an increased generation and decreased clearance of ROS. As the result, the impairment of mitophagy can result in the accumulation of damaged mitochondria, further intensifying mitochondrial dysfunction and promoting the progression of AD [41].
2.4 Oxidative stress
Under normal physiological conditions, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum and other cellular components generate a low level of ROS, including superoxide anion (O2-), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radical (OH·) [42]. In the brains of AD patients, the production of ROS may be augmented due to mitochondrial dysfunction, enzymatic anomalies or inflammatory responses. In addition, as the organism's antioxidant capacity is diminished, ROS is not unable to be removed effectively. Then, excess ROS can oxidize amino acid residues in proteins, leading to structural alteration, function impairment as well as DNA damage [43]. Then, oxidatively damaged proteins can result in protein aggregation and dysfunction within neurons [42]. It's worth noting that mitochondrial DNA is more vulnerable to ROS attack compared to nuclear DNA in AD, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and energy metabolic impairment. In addition to its effects on proteins and nucleic acids, ROS can also target polyunsaturated fatty acids in cell membranes, triggering lipid peroxidation [44, 45], which can generate lipid peroxides and free radicals that disrupt the structure and function of cell membranes and perpetuate a deleterious positive feedback loop, thereby exacerbating the progression of AD.
2.5 Inflammation response
In the context of AD, neurons and glial cells elicit a series of inflammatory mediators, which can not only augment inflammatory responses, impair neurons directly but also increase the permeability of the BBB, thus promoting the invasion of peripheral immune system cells. Firstly, the accumulation of Aβ can activate microglia, transitioning them into a pro-inflammatory phenotype. Then, the activated microglia releases pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) and ROS [46, 47]. Moreover, when the complement system is activated, it generates membrane attack complexes (MACs) that can damage neurons and glial cells, thereby exacerbating the inflammatory response [48]. Additionally, peripheral immune system cells, including T cells and B cells, traverse the BBB to enter the brain, where they secrete inflammatory cytokines and cytotoxic molecules, further intensifying neuroinflammation [49].
2.6 Acetylcholinesterase abnormity
Acetylcholinesterase is an enzymatic entity resident within the synaptic cleft and its primary function is to catalyze the rapid degradation of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) [50]. Under physiological conditions, acetylcholinesterase activity ensures the rapid clearance of ACh after synthesis, thus terminating the transmission of neural signals. Additionally, acetylcholinesterase is able to bind to Aβ to form complex that not only enhances the stability of the enzyme, but may also modulate its catalytic activity [51, 52]. However, the interaction between Aβ and acetylcholinesterase could potentially diminish the hydrolytic action of the enzyme on ACh via steric hindrance [53]. In the pathological context of AD, this binding may lead to an abnormal rise in acetylcholinesterase activity. So, the excessive acetylcholinesterase activity combined with the decrease of ACh level can promote neurodegenerative changes, thereby aggravating the pathological progress of AD [54]. Besides, the decreased ACh level can lead to synaptic structural damage, encompassing both presynaptic and postsynaptic alterations, which impair the transmission of neural signals and compromises the stability of the neural network. Based on this mechanism, the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase is an efficacious therapeutic approach for AD [55]. Therefore, medications that can reduce the activity of acetylcholinesterase, such as Donepezil and Rivastigmine, can be used to increase the level of ACh in the synaptic cleft and improve cognitive function in AD patients [56,57,58,59,60].
3 The blood–brain barrier (BBB)
The BBB is a dynamic and selective permeable structure within the central nervous system (CNS), composed of vascular endothelial cells, pericytes, astrocyte foot processes, and basal membranes [61]. It precisely regulates the exchange of substances between the blood and brain tissue, maintaining the homeostasis of the brain environment and protecting nerve cells from harmful substances from the periphery. Its core characteristics include a continuous and pore-free barrier formed by tight junctions between capillary endothelial cells, as well as a highly specialized transport system [62].
The BBB is mainly composed of brain capillary endothelial cells. The cells are separated by tight junction proteins (such as occludin, claudin-5), forming a physical barrier that effectively blocks the paracellular diffusion of macromolecules and polar substances [63]. The basement membrane of endothelial cells is composed of laminin and collagen. Pericyte parts wrap around the endothelial cells and participate in vascular regulation. The foot processes of astrocytes dynamically affect the permeability of the barrier by secreting neurotrophic factors and regulating ion balance. In addition, microglia and neuronal terminals also participate in the regulation of the microenvironment of barrier function through paracrine signals [64].
The function of BBB has multiple protective and selective properties. It allows small lipid-soluble substances (such as oxygen and carbon dioxide) to freely diffuse, while essential nutrients such as glucose and amino acids need to be transported actively through specific transporters [65]. Through efflux transporters (such as P-glycoprotein), lipophilic drugs and metabolic wastes are pumped back into the blood to reduce the accumulation of toxins in the brain [66]. At the same time, BBB can restrict the entry of immune cells and inflammatory factors, avoiding excessive immune responses in the CNS [67].
In the field of drug delivery, the high selectivity of the BBB has become a major obstacle in the treatment of central nervous system diseases [68]. Current research focuses on strategies to overcome the BBB, including receptor-mediated transport (such as transferrin receptor targeting), temporary opening of the barrier (such as ultrasound combined with microbubble technology), and nanocarrier delivery systems [69]. Additionally, inhibitors targeting efflux transporters (such as verapamil) can enhance the brain distribution of drugs, providing a new research direction for treating diseases such as AD and glioma [70].
4 An overview of exosomes
In recent years, the role of exosomes in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDs) has attracted great interest due to their low immunogenicity, biocompatibility, special spherical load structure and ability to penetrate the BBB [71,72,73,74,75,76,77].
4.1 Formation and composition of exosomes
The generation of exosomes is depicted in (Fig. 2B, C) [74]. Specifically, the plasma membrane first invaginates to form early sorting endosomes (ESEs), which contain extracellular soluble proteins and surface proteins [75]. Concurrently, inward budding of the plasma membrane can fuse with pre-existing ESEs. Subsequently, these ESEs mature into late sorting endosomes (LSEs), with their membranes invaginating once again to encapsulate intracellular contents, yielding multiple intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) of varying sizes and compositions, ultimately forming multivesicular bodies (MVBs) [76]. Finally, MVBs can be degraded by fusion with autophagosomes or lysosomes, or by fusion with the plasma membrane to release ILVs in the form of exosomes [77]. Furthermore, the biogenesis, cargo sorting and secretion of exosomes are regulated by various proteins, such as ESCRT, Alix, CD81, CD9, CD63, TSG101, and others [74, 77, 78]. Finally, the release of exosomes involves the participation of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptor (SNARE) complexes and the synaptosome-associated protein family [79]. Consequently, exosomes derived from different parental cells all contain certain common protein markers, including Alix, TSG101, SNARE and RAB GTPases [80]. Moreover, certain lipid components, such as cholesterol, ceramides and sphingomyelin, also actively promote the formation and release of exosomes [76].
During the formation of exosomes, a variety of molecules, including lipids, proteins, metabolites, nucleic acids and cytoplasm, are actively or passively loaded into the vesicles [79]. The content varies depending on the type of parental cell [80]. Since exosomes originate from the plasma membrane, their lipid components, such as cholesterol, phospholipids and phosphatidylethanolamine, are primarily distributed on their surface, which are similar to the composition of the phospholipid bilayer of parental cells [80]. Additionally, with the advancement of omics technologies and bioinformatics, an increasing number of exosomes components have been identified in recent years [81, 82].
4.2 The characteristics of exosomes
Exosomes represent promising carriers for biomolecules/drugs, as they can protect cargoes from enzymatic degradation or macrophage clearance and even enhance their biological functions [78]. Furthermore, they also can efficiently mediate intercellular communication and regulate cellular activities [75]. Specifically, exosomes mediate intercellular communication through three main mechanisms: (1) direct interaction between exosome membrane proteins and target membrane proteins. Specifically, the membrane proteins on the surface of exosomes can directly bind to the membrane proteins on the surface of target cells, thereby activating the signaling pathway within the target cells. This combination can precisely regulate cellular communication, but it is also limited in space and time. (2) The enzymatic cleavage fragments of exosome membrane proteins serve as ligands. To be specific, exosome membrane proteins are cleaved by proteases in the extracellular matrix and the resulting fragments can be used as ligands to bind to receptors on the surface of target cells and activate intracellular signaling pathways, which can increase the diversity of communication between cells. However, the enzymolysis process of exosome membrane proteins is affected by many factors, and the accuracy of signal transmission may be affected. (3) The fusion of exosome membrane and target membrane. Exosome membrane can directly fuse with the target cell membrane to transfer proteins, RNA and other molecules in exosomes to target cells, thereby regulating the biological activity of target cells [74, 75, 83]. Taken together, the excellent loading capacity and unique cellular internalization process give exosomes unique advantages as potential AD therapeutic agents/carriers [84].
5 Exosomes-based methods treating AD
5.1 Microglia-derived exosomes
Microglia are the resident immune cells of the brain, playing a complex role in neurodegenerative diseases, including inflammation regulation, neuroprotection, and the clearance of cellular debris. Microglia-derived exosomes have also been found to play a role in the treatment of AD. Li et al. discovered that exosomes from M2-polarized microglia (M2-EXOs) could exert a protective effect in the pathogenesis of AD by improving PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitochondrial autophagy [85]. Similarly, exosomes from M2 microglia modulated by 1070 nm light could alleviate the β-amyloid burden and improve cognitive function in an AD mouse model by reducing neuroinflammation and promoting neuronal dendritic spine plasticity [86]. Moreover, the content of miR-124-3p in exosomes from microglia after repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (rmTBI) (EXO-124) increased and alleviated neurodegeneration by targeting the Rela/ApoE signaling pathway (Fig. 5A) [87]. Additionally, glutaminase 1 could enhance microglial activation and the release of pro-inflammatory exosomes to regulate neuroinflammation post-cerebral ischemia (Fig. 5B) [88]. All the above reports have revealed the possibility of using exosomes derived from small stromal cells in the treatment of AD.
Schematic of in vivo experiments of microglia exosome miR-124-3p to reduce neurodegeneration and improve cognitive outcomes [87] (A). Schematic illustration of glutaminase 1 modulating neuroinflammation after cerebral ischemia by enhancing microglial activation and pro-inflammatory exosome release [88] (B). Exosomes derived from bone-marrow mesenchymal stem cells alleviate neuroinflammation and synaptic damage by inhibiting the activation of glial cells in the hippocampus [99] (C). Diagram illustrating the process of preparing PEVs [102] (D)
5.2 Stem cells-derived exosomes
Stem cells-derived exosomes (NSC-exos) contain various biomolecules, such as proteins, RNAs and lipids, can act as intercellular messengers involved in cell communication processes. In the treatment of AD, NSC-exos can carry beneficial biomolecules for neural cells, helping to improve or repair neural cell function (as summarized in Table 1). A meta-analysis has shown that NSC-exos demonstrate significant efficacy in treating AD models. Mechanistically, NSC-exos treatment significantly reduced Aβ plaques in the hippocampus and lowered pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) [89]. Besides, it can also downregulate the NF-B/ERK/JNK-related signaling pathways in glioma cell line HMC3 (ATCC-CRL-3304) and reduce inflammatory mediators associated with neuroinflammation, such as iNOS, IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 [90]. In addition, exosomes from other special sources have been reported to have similar functions. For example, (1) heat shock induced NSC-exos have a significant neuroprotective effect on oxidative stress and amyloid β-induced neurotoxicity [91]. (2) Adipose-derived NSC-exos reduced β-amyloid pathology and neuronal apoptosis in AD mouse models and can decrease the levels of apoptosis-related molecules p53, Bax, precursor caspase-3, cleaved caspase-3 and Bcl-2 proteins [92]. (3) Hypoxic-pretreated adipose-derived stem cell exosomes can also improve the cognitive function of AD mouse models by transmitting circ-Epc1 and altering microglia M1/M2 polarization [93]. (4) human non-restrictive somatic stem cell (hUSSC)-derived exosomes can reduce Aβ accumulation to improve learning and memory function as well as up-regulate synaptic and postsynaptic molecules associated with neuroplasticity, including NMDAR1, integrin β1, synaptophysin, PPKα and GAP-43 [94]. These studies proved that NSC-exos had the potential to treat AD, exploring its specific mechanism and pointing out the direction for further clinical research. However, the development of therapeutic NSC-exos is still in its infancy, and we still need more research to fill out the toolbox for AD therapy.
5.3 Mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are adult stem cells that can be isolated from connective tissues (including bone marrow and adipose tissue) and have become attractive candidates for cellular therapy applications. Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs-exos) possess immunomodulatory, neuroprotective effect, neurodegenerative promotion and abnormal protein clearance effects [95]. Currently MSCs-exos are increasingly being studied in various AD models, indicating that they may be feasible therapeutic agents for treating various diseases (as summarized in Table 1) [96]. For example, Hou et al. found that MSCs-exo could treat AD by promoting Aβ degradation, regulating immune responses, protecting neurons, promoting axon growth and improving cognitive impairment [97]. Besides, Cui et al. discovered that exosomes from hypoxia-preconditioned MSCs could improve cognitive decline in APP/PS1 mice by rescuing synaptic dysfunction and regulating inflammatory responses, with the potential mechanism being a significant increase in miR-21 expression in MSCs after hypoxia treatment [98]. Additionally, exosomes from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hucMSCs-exos) [98], exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC-exos) (Fig. 5C) [89] and exosomes from early-passage rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSC-exos) [100] could also reduce neuronal cell damage in AD and exert therapeutic effects. Moreover, Katsuda et al. also found that human adipose tissue-derived MSCs (shADSCs) could secrete exosomes carrying active neuropeptides, which could degrade Aβ and potentially treat AD [101].
5.4 Other cells-derived exosomes
Furthermore, in addition to the common sources of exosomes, various other sources of exosomes have been found to be useful for the treatment of AD (as summarized in Table 1). For example, PEVs isolated from clinical-grade PCs of healthy donors using high-speed centrifugation could help restore neuronal function in SH-SY5Y cells and showed significant neuroprotective effects against erastin-induced ferroptosis in dopaminergic neurons (Fig. 5D) [102]. Besides, exosome-like nanovesicles from lemons (EXO-CLs) could penetrate the BBB and exhibited antioxidant activity comparable to ascorbic acid without affecting cell viability (Fig. 6D, E) [103]. In addition, human-induced GABAergic progenitor cells improved cognitive function in mice and inhibited astrocyte activation through anti-inflammatory exosomes, with the mechanism related to the regulation of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) pathway mediated by CD4 + Th1 cells [104]. Then, circulating small cell-derived miR-342-5p targeted β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 to improve β-amyloid formation in AD [105]. Also, brain microvascular endothelial cell-derived exosomes effectively improved cognitive dysfunction in a mouse AD model by upregulating P-gp, thereby enhancing Aβ clearance [106]. Additionally, plant sphingolipids could promote exosome release and alleviate amyloid β pathology in an AD mouse model [107].
The primary hypothesis of study. Exosomes drived from curcumin-treated (primed) cells (Exo-cur) can better relive the symptoms of AD by inhibiting phosphorylation of Tau protein through AKT/GSK-3β pathway [108] (A); Morphology of Exo and Exo-cur observed by TEM [108] (B); Schematic design of the MAPleX system. (right) The MAPleX system consists of three components: a cargo protein, a Phocl, and an exosomal membrane protein (eMP). (left) mMaple3 is the Phocl, and cd9 is the eMP. cd9 enables cargo loading into the exosomes. once the exosome has been isolated, 405-nm light is used to induce photocleavage of mMaple3, which releases the cargo protein from the exosomal membrane. The 405-nm light-illuminated exosomes can then be purified and deliver functional cargo protein to the recipient cell [115] (C); Schematic diagram of EXO-CL separation by filtration and ultracentrifugation [103] (D); Determination of mean particle size of developed EXO-CL and TEM image of developed EXO-CL [103] (E); Schematic diagram of brain microvascular endothelial cell-derived exosomes enhancing Aβ clearance by up-regulating P-gp and improving cognitive dysfunction in AD mouse models [106] (F)
In summary, exosomes derived from stem cells and other cell types holds great promise for the treatment of AD, but more research is needed to optimize treatment regimens and ensure their safety and efficacy (Fig. 6F) [106]. Besides, although the low immunogenicity and ease of acquisition of stem cell-derived exosomes have made them particularly attention-grabbing, their detailed therapeutic mechanisms are not yet fully understood and require further investigation.
6 Bioengineered exosomes for the treatment of AD
The bio-synthetic exosome therapy for AD is an emerging regenerative medicine approach and it has received extensive attention in scientific research and clinical trials in recent years. Studies have shown that exosome-based therapies exhibit low immunogenicity and inflammatory responses [107]. Moreover, biosynthetic exosomes can carry selected drug molecules, such as nerve growth factors, anti-inflammatory factors and small molecule drugs to reduce the accumulation of abnormal proteins or promote the regeneration and repair of neural cells.
6.1 Nanodrug loading strategies based on exosomes
Recent research has demonstrated that exosomes can serve as drug delivery carriers to penetrate BBB and target drug delivery to lesion sites for therapeutic effects (as summarized in Table 2). For example, exosomes pretreated with piperine (Exo-cur) designed by Wang et al. could efficiently cross BBB through receptor-mediated transcytosis, enter the brain tissue and inhibit Tau phosphorylation to improve targeted drug delivery and restore neuronal function in AD (Fig. 6A, B) [108]. Zhao et al. constructed exosomes loaded with Ber and Pal that could promote drug accumulation in cells and tissues, improve the targeting of drugs across BBB and inhibit Aβ plaque formation and microglial activation, while regulate the secretion of inflammatory factors [109]. Additionally, exosomes loaded with Olesoxime-resveratrol (OLX-RSV) could inhibit Aβ1-42 aggregation and cross BBB, showing good biocompatibility [110]. In addition to loading herbal extracts, therapeutic nucleic acids (miRNA-22) and proteins (Tom40 protein) can also be loaded into exosomes for the treatment of AD [111, 112]. In summary, exosome-based nanomedicine delivery strategies have shown promising prospects, but more in-depth mechanism studies and clinical studies are needed to promote their clinical application.
6.2 Targeted precision delivery strategies based on exosomes
To further improve the targeted delivery performance of exosomes, researchers have developed various targeted receptor/ligand-modified exosome delivery systems. For example, manganese was modified onto exosomes (MExo-Gem) to target the delivery of gemfibrozil (Gem) and restore the lysosomal activity of microglia for clearing Aβ aggregates. Mechanistically, mannose-modified exosomes can interact with the mannose receptor on microglia, leading to the uptake of exosomes by microglia (Fig. 7E) [113]. For example, Zhang et al. constructed neutrophil-derived exosomes (MP@Cur-MExo) with surface-modified magnetic nanoparticles (SPIONs) that targeted mitochondria and Aβ, which could alleviate Aβ-induced neurotoxicity and improve mitochondrial function in neurons [114]. Furthermore, photo-cleavable proteins (mMaple3), rabies virus glycoprotein peptides, RVG peptides, Fe65 protein, angiopep-2 peptides and others have been used to modify the surface of exosomes to increase targeting and have shown promising therapeutic effects in AD (Figs. 6C, 7A–D) [115,116,117,118,119]. In general, the above reports on biosynthetic exosomes provide new insights into the treatment of AD and further confirm the potential of exosome-based nanotherapeutic strategies. However, these studies are still in the stage of theoretical verification. How to effectively produce biosynthetic exosomes on a large scale and how to precisely control the molecular composition and function of exosomes are the main challenges of current research.
Schematic Illustration of the Synthesis Process of Exosome-Liposome Hybrid Nanovesicles [116] (A). Schematic Illustration of the Lesion-Recognizing NPs. (a) Preparation of the Lesion-Recognizing NPs. (b) Mechanism of the Lesion-Recognizing NPs for the Synergistic Treatment of AD. After intranasal administration, (1) the lesion-recognizing NPs crossed the nasal mucosa and (2) migrated to the diseased brain area. (3) The NPs recognized the neurons and (4) fused with the cell membrane of neurons to directly release the cores of NPs into the cytoplasm. (5) The cores of NPs achieved the controlled release of siRNAs in the high-ROS environment to downregulate the level of BACE1 and caspase-3 to (6) reduce the Aβ plaques and (7, 8) inhibit the apoptosis of neurons. (9) The MSC-derived exosomes reduced the number of reactive astrocytes for the synergistic treatment of AD [117] (B). Schematic diagram of preparation of bioengineered microglia targeting exosomes [113] (C). Schematic diagram showing the steps involved in the production of engineered Fe65-EXO [118] (D)
7 Conclusions
The limitations of existing treatment methods for AD have driven the research on innovative therapies based on nanotechnology. Exosomes, as a natural biological carrier, have become a research hotspot in the field of AD treatment. Their core advantages lie in: (1) Targeted delivery capability: Exosomes can penetrate the BBB to achieve precise drug delivery; (2) Multifunctionality: Through surface modification or content recombination, different therapeutic strategies targeting different targets can be developed; (3) Diversity of cell sources: Various sources of exosomes have shown potential in improving cognitive function.
However, the clinical translation of exosome therapy still faces multiple challenges: (1) The technology for large-scale production still needs to be developed and optimized; (2) The targeting specificity of existing modification strategies in the complex brain microenvironment needs to be improved; (3) Long-term biocompatibility and other aspects still require systematic verification. We believe that future research will focus on: developing efficient and stable exosome engineering technologies; establishing multi-targeted combined treatment strategies; and deepening mechanism analysis through preclinical models (such as organoids). In summary, current research shows that exosome therapy provides a new paradigm for the treatment of AD, but its clinical implementation urgently requires interdisciplinary collaboration to break through technical bottlenecks and establish standardized evaluation systems.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published.
Abbreviations
- AD:
-
Alzheimer's disease
- Aβ :
-
Amyloid beta proteins
- APP:
-
Amyloid precursor protein
- ATP:
-
Adenosine triphosphate
- BBB:
-
Blood-brain barrier
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- ESEs:
-
Early sorting endosomes
- BMSC-exos:
-
Exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
- BM-MSC-exos:
-
Exosomes from early-passage rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
- hucMSCs-exos:
-
Exosomes from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells
- MSCs-exos:
-
Exosomes from mesenchymal stem cells
- EXO-CLs:
-
Exosome-like nanovesicles from lemons
- shADSCs:
-
Human adipose tissue-derived MSCs
- hUSSC:
-
Human non-restrictive somatic stem cell
- H2O2 :
-
Hydrogen peroxide
- OH· :
-
Hydroxyl radical
- ILVs:
-
Intraluminal vesicles
- IL-1β:
-
Interleukin-1β
- LSEs:
-
Late sorting endosomes
- MACs:
-
Membrane attack complexes
- MSCs:
-
Mesenchymal stem cells
- mtDNA:
-
Mitochondrial DNA
- MVBs:
-
Multivesicular bodies
- NPs:
-
Nanoparticles
- NDs:
-
Neurodevelopmental disorders
- ACh:
-
Neurotransmitter acetylcholine
- OLX-RSV:
-
Olesoxime-resveratrol
- PHFs:
-
Paired helical filaments
- ROS:
-
Reactive oxygen species
- SNARE:
-
Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptor
- NSC-exos:
-
Stem cells-derived exosomes
- O2-:
-
Superoxide anion
- SPIONs:
-
Surface-modified magnetic nanoparticles
- TNF:
-
Tumor necrosis factor
- TNFα:
-
Tumor necrosis factor α
- BACE1:
-
β-Secretase
- MOFs:
-
Metal-organic frameworks
- NPs:
-
Nano-polymers
- MAPT:
-
Microtubule-associated protein tau
- BACE1:
-
β-Secretase
- AICD:
-
An intracellular domain
- Alix:
-
ALG-2 interacting protein X
- TSG101:
-
Tumor susceptibility gene 101 protein
- SNARE:
-
Soluble NSF attachment protein receptor
- RAB GTPases:
-
Ras-related protein in brain GTPases
- M2-EXOs:
-
M2-polarized microglia
- PINK1:
-
PTEN-induced putative kinase 1
- hUSSC:
-
Human non-restrictive somatic stem cell
- NMDAR1:
-
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 1
- PPKα:
-
Protein kinase C alpha
- Exo-cur:
-
Exosomes pretreated with piperine
- Gem:
-
Gemfibrozil
- MExo-Gem:
-
Manganese was modified onto exosomes
- SPIONs:
-
Surface-modified magnetic nanoparticles
References
Abbass IM, Choi D, Wallick C, Assunção SS. Trends in healthcare resource use preceding diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;2023:8154701. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8154701.
Castro-Aldrete L, Einsiedler M, Novakova Martinkova J, Depypere H, Alvin Ang TF, Mielke MM, et al. Alzheimer disease seen through the lens of sex and gender. Nat Rev Neurol. 2025;21(5):235–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-025-01071-0.
Fan F, Liu H, Shi X, Ai Y, Liu Q, Cheng Y. The efficacy and safety of Alzheimer’s disease therapies: an updated umbrella review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;85:1195–204. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-215423.
Cummings J, Cohen S, Murphy J, Brothers HM, Nejati M, Forrestal F, et al. Evaluation of cognitive, functional, and behavioral effects observed in EMERGE, a phase 3 trial of aducanumab in people with early Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21(6):e70224. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70224.
Koch G, Altomare D, Benussi A, Bréchet L, Casula EP, Dodich A, et al. The emerging field of non-invasive brain stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2024;147(12):4003–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae292.
Gallego I, Villate-Beitia I, Saenz-Del-Burgo L, Puras G, Pedraz JL. Therapeutic opportunities and delivery strategies for brain revascularization in stroke, neurodegeneration, and aging. Pharmacol Rev. 2022;74(2):439–61. https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.121.000418.
Pardo-Moreno T, González-Acedo A, Rivas-Domínguez A, García-Morales V, García-Cozar FJ, Ramos-Rodríguez JJ, et al. Therapeutic approach to Alzheimer’s disease: current treatments and new perspectives. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061117.
Taliyan R, Kakoty V, Sarathlal KC, Kharavtekar SS, Karennanavar CR, Choudhary YK, et al. Nanocarrier mediated drug delivery as an impeccable therapeutic approach against Alzheimer’s disease. J Control Release. 2022;343:528–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.01.044.
Auquière M, Muccioli GG, des Rieux A. Methods and challenges in purifying drug-loaded extracellular vesicles. J Extracell Vesicles. 2025;14(6):e70097. https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.70097.
You Y, Liu M, Yan N, Zhu D, Cheng X, Hu Y, et al. Smart materials and devices for enhanced delivery of extracellular vesicles. Adv Mater. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202501081.
Elliott RO, He M. Unlocking the power of exosomes for crossing biological barriers in drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:122. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010122.
Zhang S, Zhang ZY, Sui BD, Zheng CX, Fu Y. The epigenetic landscape of mesenchymal stem cell and extracellular vesicle therapy. Trends Cell Biol. 2025;S0962–8924(25):00088–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2025.03.008.
Fang RH, Hu CM, Luk BT, Gao W, Copp JA, Tai Y, et al. Cancer cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for anticancer vaccination and drug delivery. Nano Lett. 2014;14:2181–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl500618u.
Hu CM, Fang RH, Wang KC, Luk BT, Thamphiwatana S, Dehaini D, et al. Nanoparticle biointerfacing by platelet membrane cloaking. Nature. 2015;526:118–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15373.
Zhao Y, Haney MJ, Klyachko NL, Li S, Booth SL, Higginbotham SM, et al. Polyelectrolyte complex optimization for macrophage delivery of redox enzyme nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2011;6:25–42. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.10.129.
Brynskikh AM, Zhao Y, Mosley RL, Li S, Boska MD, Klyachko NL, et al. Macrophage delivery of therapeutic nanozymes in a murine model of Parkinson’s disease. Nanomedicine. 2010;5:379–96. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.10.7.
Perets N, Betzer O, Shapira R, Brenstein S, Angel A, Sadan T, et al. Golden exosomes selectively target brain pathologies in neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders. Nano Lett. 2019;19:3422–31. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04148.
Scheltens P, De Strooper B, Kivipelto M, Holstege H, Chételat G, Teunissen CE, et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 2021;397:1577–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32205-4.
Rafii MS, Aisen PS. Amyloid-lowering immunotherapies for Alzheimer disease: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-025-01123-5.
Luu L, Ciccotosto GD, Cappai R. The Alzheimer’s disease amyloid precursor protein and its neuritogenic actions. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2021;18:772–86. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205018666211208141017.
Sun Z, Kwon JS, Ren Y, Chen S, Walker CK, Lu X, et al. Modeling late-onset Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology via direct neuronal reprogramming. Science. 2024;385(6708):adl2992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl2992.
Olsson B, Lautner R, Andreasson U, Öhrfelt A, Portelius E, Bjerke M, et al. CSF and blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:673–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00070-3.
Pera M, Montesinos J, Larrea D, Agrawal RR, Velasco KR, Stavrovskaya IG, et al. MAM and C99, key players in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2020;154:235–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2020.03.016.
Penke B, Bogár F, Paragi G, Gera J, Fülöp L. Key peptides and proteins in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2019;20:577–99. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203720666190103123434.
Tiwari S, Atluri V, Kaushik A, Yndart A, Nair M. Alzheimer’s disease: pathogenesis, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:5541–54. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S200490.
Wang T, Chen J, Hou Y, Yu Y, Wang B. BAP31 deficiency contributes to the formation of amyloid-β plaques in Alzheimer’s disease by reducing the stability of RTN3. FASEB J. 2019;33:4936–46. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201801702R.
Botella Lucena P, Heneka MT. Inflammatory aspects of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2024;148(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-024-02790-2.
Iram F, Shahid M, Ansari J, Ashraf GM, Hassan MI, Islam A. Navigating the maze of Alzheimer’s disease by exploring BACE1: discovery, current scenario, and future prospects. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;98:102342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2024.102342.
Zhou Y, Zhu F, Liu Y, Zheng M, Wang Y, Zhang D, et al. Blood-brain barrier-penetrating siRNA nanomedicine for Alzheimer’s disease therapy. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eabc7031. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc7031.
Teunissen CE, Kolster R, Triana-Baltzer G, Janelidze S, Zetterberg H, Kolb HC. Plasma p-tau immunoassays in clinical research for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21(1):e14397. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14397.
Zhang H, Wei W, Zhao M, Ma L, Jiang X, Pei H, et al. Interaction between Aβ and tau in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17:2181–92. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.57078.
Lauretti E, Dincer O, Praticò D. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA). 2020;1867:118664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118664.
Gallardo G, Holtzman DM. Amyloid-β and tau at the crossroads of Alzheimer’s disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9358-8_16.
Brett BL, Gardner RC, Godbout J, Dams-O’Connor K, Keene CD. Traumatic brain injury and risk of neurodegenerative disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2022;91:498–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.05.025.
Parra Bravo C, Naguib SA, Gan L. Cellular and pathological functions of tau. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2024;25:845–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-024-00753-9.
Mummery CJ, Börjesson-Hanson A, Blackburn DJ, Vijverberg EGB, De Deyn PP, Ducharme S, et al. Tau-targeting antisense oligonucleotide MAPTRx in mild Alzheimer’s disease: a phase 1b, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Nat Med. 2023;29:1437–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02326-3.
Gowda P, Reddy PH, Kumar S. Deregulated mitochondrial microRNAs in Alzheimer’s disease: focus on synapse and mitochondria. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;73:101529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101529.
Reddy PH, Oliver DM. Amyloid beta and phosphorylated tau-induced defective autophagy and mitophagy in Alzheimer’s disease. Cells. 2019;8:488. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8050488.
Nikolac Perkovic M, Videtic Paska A, Konjevod M, Kouter K, Svob Strac D, Nedic Erjavec G, et al. Epigenetics of Alzheimer’s disease. Biomolecules. 2021;11:195. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11020195.
Ionescu-Tucker A, Cotman CW. Emerging roles of oxidative stress in brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2021;107:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.07.014.
Oh CK, Nakamura T, Zhang X, Lipton SA. Redox regulation, protein S-nitrosylation, and synapse loss in Alzheimer’s and related dementias. Neuron. 2024;112(23):3823–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.10.013.
Cheignon C, Tomas M, Bonnefont-Rousselot D, Faller P, Hureau C, Collin F. Oxidative stress and the amyloid beta peptide in Alzheimer’s disease. Redox Biol. 2018;14:450–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2017.10.014.
Nakajima A, Ohizumi Y. Potential benefits of nobiletin, a citrus flavonoid, against Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3380. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143380.
Singh A, Kukreti R, Saso L, Kukreti S. Oxidative stress: a key modulator in neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules. 2019;24:1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24081583.
Twarowski B, Herbet M. Inflammatory processes in Alzheimer’s disease-pathomechanism, diagnosis and treatment: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:6518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076518.
Dhapola R, Hota SS, Sarma P, Bhattacharyya A, Medhi B, Reddy DH. Recent advances in molecular pathways and therapeutic implications targeting neuroinflammation for Alzheimer’s disease. Inflammopharmacology. 2021;29:1669–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-021-00889-6.
Al-Khayri JM, Sahana GR, Nagella P, Joseph BV, Alessa FM, Al-Mssallem MQ. Flavonoids as potential anti-inflammatory molecules: a review. Molecules. 2022;27:2901. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092901.
McGeer PL, Rogers J, McGeer EG. Inflammation, antiinflammatory agents, and Alzheimer’s disease: the last 22 years. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;54:853–7. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160488.
Rego S, Sanchez G, Da Mesquita S. Current views on meningeal lymphatics and immunity in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2023;18:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-023-00645-0.
Rees TM, Brimijoin S. The role of acetylcholinesterase in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs Today (Barc). 2003;39:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1358/dot.2003.39.1.740206.
Moss DE, Perez RG. Anti-neurodegenerative benefits of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease: nexus of cholinergic and nerve growth factor dysfunction. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2021;18:1010–22. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205018666211215150547.
Kashif M, Sivaprakasam P, Vijendra P, Waseem M, Pandurangan AK. A recent update on pathophysiology and therapeutic interventions of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2023;29:3428–41. https://doi.org/10.2174/0113816128264355231121064704.
Fronza MG, Alves D, Praticò D, Savegnago L. The neurobiology and therapeutic potential of multi-targeting β-secretase, glycogen synthase kinase 3β and acetylcholinesterase in Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;90:102033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2023.102033.
Abeysinghe AADT, Deshapriya RDUS, Udawatte C. Alzheimer’s disease; a review of the pathophysiological basis and therapeutic interventions. Life Sci. 2020;256:117996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117996.
Srivastava S, Ahmad R, Khare SK. Alzheimer’s disease and its treatment by different approaches: a review. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;216:113320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113320.
Birks JS, Harvey RJ. Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;6:CD001190. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001190.pub3.
Marucci G, Buccioni M, Ben DD, Lambertucci C, Volpini R, Amenta F. Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropharmacology. 2021;190:108352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108352.
Birks J. Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2006:CD005593. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005593.
Fan F, Liu H, Shi X, Ai Y, Liu Q, Cheng Y. The efficacy and safety of Alzheimer’s disease therapies: an updated umbrella review. J Alzheimer’s Dis JAD. 2022;85:1195–204. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-215423.
d’Angremont E, Begemann MJH, van Laar T, Sommer IEC. Cholinesterase inhibitors for treatment of psychotic symptoms in Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2023;80:813–23. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1835.
Abbott NJ, Patabendige AA, Dolman DE, Yusof SR, Begley DJ. Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37(1):13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030.
Jia Y, Wu Y, Zhang F, Sun Y, Liu Y. Overcoming the blood-brain barrier challenge: nanotechnology-enhanced photodynamic therapy for glioblastoma treatment. Chem Commun (Camb). 2025. https://doi.org/10.1039/d5cc03192c.
Li M, Gao J, Lu F, Gong C, Zhang J, Wang L, et al. Research progress of anti-angiogenic therapy combined with immunotherapy and radiotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (review). Oncol Lett. 2025;30(3):434. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2025.15180.
Long C, Pu Y, Keng S, Tao J, Zhang B, Yue R. Novel Insights into the Mechanism and Treatment of Diabetes-Related Brain Complications: Focusing on the Blood-Brain Barrier Impairment. Aging Dis. 2025. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2025.0296.
Altahrawi AY, James AW, Shah ZA. The role of oxidative stress and inflammation in the pathogenesis and treatment of vascular dementia. Cells. 2025;14(8):609. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14080609.
Paul PR, Mishra MK, Bora S, Kukal S, Singh A, Kukreti S, et al. The impact of P-glycoprotein on CNS drug efflux and variability in response. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2025;39(3):e70190. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.70190.
Yu M, Ma H, Lai X, Wu J, Shen M, Yan J. Stem cell extracellular vesicles: a new dawn for anti-inflammatory treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Front Aging Neurosci. 2025;17:1592578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1592578.
Izhar M, Al Gharyani M, Kattaa AH, Cardona JJ, Jain RP, Shaghaghian E, et al. Overview of preclinical and clinical trials of nanoparticles for the treatment of brain metastases. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(7):899. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17070899.
Shumer-Elbaz M, Ad-El N, Chulanova Y, Brier D, Goldsmith M, Bismuth M, et al. Low-frequency ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening enables non-invasive lipid nanoparticle RNA delivery to glioblastoma. J Control Release. 2025;385:114018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114018.
Popović N, Morales-Delgado N, Vidal Mena D, Alonso A, Pascual Martínez M, Caballero Bleda M, et al. Verapamil and Alzheimer’s disease: past, present, and future. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:562. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00562.
Yin Q, Ji X, Lv R, Pei JJ, Du Y, Shen C, et al. Targetting exosomes as a new biomarker and therapeutic approach for Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Interv Aging. 2020;15:195–205. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S240400.
Mathew B, Mansuri MS, Williams KR, Nairn AC. Exosomes as emerging biomarker tools in neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders-a proteomics perspective. Brain Sci. 2021;11:258. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020258.
Fan Y, Chen Z, Zhang M. Role of exosomes in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of central nervous system diseases. J Transl Med. 2022;20:291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03493-6.
Krylova SV, Feng D. The machinery of exosomes: biogenesis, release, and uptake. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021337.
Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. 2020;367:eaau6977. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6977.
Pegtel DM, Gould SJ. Exosomes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2019;88:487–514. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111902.
Liao W, Du Y, Zhang C, Pan F, Yao Y, Zhang T, et al. Exosomes: the next generation of endogenous nanomaterials for advanced drug delivery and therapy. Acta Biomater. 2019;86:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.045.
Gurunathan S, Kang MH, Kim JH. A comprehensive review on factors influences biogenesis, functions, therapeutic and clinical implications of exosomes. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:1281–312. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S291956.
Hessvik NP, Llorente A. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75:193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-017-2595-9.
Jeppesen DK, Fenix AM, Franklin JL, Higginbotham JN, Zhang Q, Zimmerman LJ, et al. Reassessment of exosome composition. Cell. 2019;177:428–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.029.
Wu CC, Tsantilas KA, Park J, Plubell D, Sanders JA, Naicker P, et al. Enrichment of extracellular vesicles using Mag-Net for the analysis of the plasma proteome. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):5447. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60595-7.
Hosseini K, Ranjbar M, Pirpour Tazehkand A, Asgharian P, Montazersaheb S, Tarhriz V, et al. Evaluation of exosomal non-coding RNAs in cancer using high-throughput sequencing. J Transl Med. 2022;20:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03231-y.
Costa Verdera H, Gitz-Francois JJ, Schiffelers RM, Vader P. Cellular uptake of extracellular vesicles is mediated by clathrin-independent endocytosis and macropinocytosis. J Control Release. 2017;266:100–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.09.019.
Terstappen GC, Meyer AH, Bell RD, Zhang W. Strategies for delivering therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20:362–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-021-00139-y.
Li N, Shu J, Yang X, Wei W, Yan A. Exosomes derived from M2 microglia cells attenuates neuronal impairment and mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease through the PINK1/Parkin pathway. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022;16:874102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2022.874102.
Chen C, Bao Y, Xing L, Jiang C, Guo Y, Tong S, et al. Exosomes derived from M2 microglial cells modulated by 1070-nm light improve cognition in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Adv Sci. 2023;10:e2304025. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202304025.
Ge X, Guo M, Hu T, Li W, Huang S, Yin Z, et al. Increased microglial exosomal miR-124-3p alleviates neurodegeneration and improves cognitive outcome after rmTBI. Mol Ther. 2020;28:503–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.11.017.
Gao G, Li C, Zhu J, Wang Y, Huang Y, Zhao S, et al. Glutaminase 1 regulates neuroinflammation after cerebral ischemia through enhancing microglial activation and pro-inflammatory exosome release. Front Immunol. 2020;11:161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00161.
Deng H, Zhao J, Li J, Chen C, Hu Z, Wu X, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of extracellular vesicles derived from stem cell for Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis study. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2024;29:340. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2909340.
Khan MI, Jeong ES, Khan MZ, Shin JH, Kim JD. Stem cells-derived exosomes alleviate neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s pathogenesis by ameliorating neuroinflamation, and regulating the associated molecular pathways. Sci Rep. 2023;13:15731. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42485-4.
Huber CC, Callegari EA, Paez MD, Romanova S, Wang H. Heat shock-induced extracellular vesicles derived from neural stem cells confer marked neuroprotection against oxidative stress and amyloid-β-caused neurotoxicity. Mol Neurobiol. 2022;59:7404–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-022-03055-3.
Lee M, Ban JJ, Yang S, Im W, Kim M. The exosome of adipose-derived stem cells reduces β-amyloid pathology and apoptosis of neuronal cells derived from the transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. 2018;1691:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.03.034.
Liu H, Jin M, Ji M, Zhang W, Liu A, Wang T. Hypoxic pretreatment of adipose-derived stem cell exosomes improved cognition by delivery of circ-Epc1 and shifting microglial M1/M2 polarization in an Alzheimer’s disease mice model. Aging (Albany NY). 2022;14:3070–83. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.203989.
Pourhadi M, Zali H, Ghasemi R, Faizi M, Mojab F, Soufi Zomorrod M. Restoring synaptic function: how intranasal delivery of 3D-cultured hUSSC exosomes improve learning and memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2024;61:3724–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-023-03733-w.
Hou X, Jiang H, Liu T, Yan J, Zhang F, Zhang X, et al. Depletion of gut microbiota resistance in 5×FAD mice enhances the therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;161:114455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114455.
Shah S, Mansour HM, Aguilar TM, Lucke-Wold B. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes as a neuroregeneration treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. Biomedicines. 2024;12:2113. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12092113.
Cui GH, Wu J, Mou FF, Xie WH, Wang FB, Wang QL, et al. Exosomes derived from hypoxia-preconditioned mesenchymal stromal cells ameliorate cognitive decline by rescuing synaptic dysfunction and regulating inflammatory responses in APP/PS1 mice. FASEB J. 2018;32:654–68. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201700600R.
Chen H, Huang Z, Lei A, Yu X, Shen M, Wu D. Mirna-211-5p inhibition enhances the protective effect of hucMSC-derived exosome in Aβ1-40 -induced SH-SY5Y cells by increasing NEP expression. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2024;38:e23624. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.23624.
Liu S, Fan M, Xu JX, Yang LJ, Qi CC, Xia QR, et al. Exosomes derived from bone-marrow mesenchymal stem cells alleviate cognitive decline in AD-like mice by improving BDNF-related neuropathology. J Neuroinflammation. 2022;19:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-022-02393-2.
Venugopal C, Shamir C, Senthilkumar S, Babu JV, Sonu PK, Nishtha KJ, et al. Dosage and passage dependent neuroprotective effects of exosomes derived from rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: an in vitro analysis. Curr Gene Ther. 2017;17:379–90. https://doi.org/10.2174/1566523218666180125091952.
Katsuda T, Oki K, Ochiya T. Potential application of extracellular vesicles of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in Alzheimer’s disease therapeutics. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1212:171–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2014_98.
Delila L, Nebie O, Le NTN, Timmerman K, Lee DY, Wu YW, et al. Neuroprotective effects of intranasal extracellular vesicles from human platelet concentrates supernatants in traumatic brain injury and Parkinson’s disease models. J Biomed Sci. 2024;31:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-024-01072-z.
Dolma L, Damodaran A, Panonnummal R, Nair SC. Exosomes isolated from citrus lemon: a promising candidate for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Ther Deliv. 2024;15(7):507–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/20415990.2024.2354119.
Chen C, Lan Z, Tang X, Chen W, Zhou X, Su H, et al. Human-derived induced GABAergic progenitor cells improve cognitive function in mice and inhibit astrocyte activation with anti-inflammatory exosomes. Ann Neurol. 2024;96:488–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27001.
Dong Z, Gu H, Guo Q, Liu X, Li F, Liu H, et al. Circulating small extracellular vesicle-derived miR-342-5p ameliorates beta-amyloid formation via targeting beta-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 in Alzheimer’s disease. Cells. 2022;11:3830. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11233830.
Pan J, He R, Huo Q, Shi Y, Zhao L. Brain microvascular endothelial cell derived exosomes potently ameliorate cognitive dysfunction by enhancing the clearance of Aβ through up-regulation of P-gp in mouse model of AD. Neurochem Res. 2020;45:2161–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-020-03076-1.
Yuyama K, Takahashi K, Usuki S, Mikami D, Sun H, Hanamatsu H, et al. Plant sphingolipids promote extracellular vesicle release and alleviate amyloid-β pathologies in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2019;9:16827. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53394-w.
Wang H, Sui H, Zheng Y, Jiang Y, Shi Y, Liang J, et al. Curcumin-primed exosomes potently ameliorate cognitive function in AD mice by inhibiting hyperphosphorylation of the tau protein through the AKT/GSK-3β pathway. Nanoscale. 2019;11:7481–96. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr01255a.
Zhao X, Ge P, Lei S, Guo S, Zhou P, Zhao L, et al. An exosome-based therapeutic strategy targeting neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease with berberine and palmatine. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2023;17:2401–20. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S417465.
Wang Z, Gao C, Zhang L, Sui R. Novel combination of Olesoxime/Resveratrol-encapsulated exosomes to improve cognitive function by targeting amyloid β-induced Alzheimer’s disease: investigation on in vitro and in vivo model. Inflammopharmacology. 2024;32:2613–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-024-01476-1.
Sayeed N, Sugaya K. Exosome mediated Tom40 delivery protects against hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress by regulating mitochondrial function. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0272511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272511.
Zhai L, Shen H, Sheng Y, Guan Q. ADMSC exo-MicroRNA-22 improve neurological function and neuroinflammation in mice with Alzheimer’s disease. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25:7513–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16787.
Hao Y, Su C, Liu X, Sui H, Shi Y, Zhao L. Bioengineered microglia-targeted exosomes facilitate Aβ clearance via enhancing activity of microglial lysosome for promoting cognitive recovery in Alzheimer’s disease. Biomater Adv. 2022;136:212770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212770.
Zhang L, Lin J, Xiang K, Shi T, Guo B. Omnidirectional improvement of mitochondrial health in Alzheimer’s disease by multi-targeting engineered activated neutrophil exosomes. J Control Release. 2024;376:470–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.10.033.
Han J, Sul JH, Lee J, Kim E, Kim HK, Chae M, et al. Engineered exosomes with a photoinducible protein delivery system enable CRISPR-Cas-based epigenome editing in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2024;16:eadi4830. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.adi4830.
Jiang S, Cai G, Yang Z, Shi H, Zeng H, Ye Q, et al. Biomimetic nanovesicles as a dual gene delivery system for the synergistic gene therapy of Alzheimer’s disease. ACS Nano. 2024;18:11753–68. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c13150.
Li J, Peng H, Zhang W, Li M, Wang N, Peng C, et al. Enhanced nose-to-brain delivery of combined small interfering RNAs using lesion-recognizing nanoparticles for the synergistic therapy of Alzheimer’s disease. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15:53177–88. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c08756.
Iyaswamy A, Thakur A, Guan XJ, Krishnamoorthi S, Fung TY, Lu K, et al. Fe65-engineered neuronal exosomes encapsulating corynoxine-B ameliorate cognition and pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:404. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01657-4.
Yu Y, Li W, Mao L, Peng W, Long D, Li D, et al. Genetically engineered exosomes display RVG peptide and selectively enrich a neprilysin variant: a potential formulation for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J Drug Target. 2021;29:1128–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/1061186X.2021.1929257.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82402735), the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2023NSFSC1481), and the Postdoctoral Research Foundation of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (2023HXBH122).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GXQ wrote the manuscript and searched the literature. YK wrote the manuscript and drew figures, YK. YXK Searched the literature. SMY contributed to supervision and writing-review, WT contributed to supervision and writing-review, SCL contributed to supervision, funding acquisition, writing-review and administration.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, X., Yang, K., Yuan, X. et al. Research progress of exosomes used in the Alzheimer's disease treatment. Discover Nano 20, 173 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-025-04361-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-025-04361-0