[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Supplier selection in Neutrosophic environment with a hybrid fuzzy decision-making method

  • Theoretical Article
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supplier selection is one of the key decisions in supply chain management. This study presents a new hybrid method of fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), and multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) in Neutrosophic environment to weigh evaluation criteria and rank suppliers. In this research, the supplier evaluation criteria are chosen based on the 10 C model and expert opinions. The most important and the least important criteria are determined using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Then, the SWARA method in Neutrosophic environment is utilized to weigh the criteria. And the MOORA method in Neutrosophic environment is applied to rank suppliers. To describe the hybrid method, a numerical study in the supply chain of auto parts is presented and solved. Vague and imprecise input parameters make supplier selection decisions complicated. Neutrosophic logic is a comprehensive logic for demonstrating uncertainty in the decision-making process. This logic improves judgment accuracy and models uncertainty more effectively and flexibly than fuzzy logic. Supplier evaluation based on the 10 C model has not been performed in previous studies. Although fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy models have been applied in supplier selection, the use of Neutrosophic numbers has been very limited. Additionally, the combination of fuzzy DEMATEL and SWARA is proposed for the first time in this research to weigh supplier evaluation criteria. And the MOORA method in Neutrosophic environment is developed to rank suppliers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

The research data is available upon request.

Abbreviations

DEMATEL:

Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory

SWARA:

Stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis

MOORA:

Multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis

MCDM:

Multi-criteria decision-making

TOPSIS:

Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution

DEA:

Data envelopment analysis

AHP:

Analytical hierarchy process

QFD:

Quality function deployment

ANP:

Analytical network process

BWM:

Best–worst method

CFCS:

Converting fuzzy data into crisp scores

WASPAS:

Weighted aggregated sum product assessment

COPRAS:

Complex proportional assessment

References

  1. Aliakbari, A., Seifbarghy, M.: A supplier selection model for social responsible supply chain. J. Optim. Ind. Eng. 4(28), 41–53 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alinezad, A., Seif, A., Esfandiari, N.: Supplier evaluation and selection with QFD and FAHP in a pharmaceutical company. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 68, 355–364 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 87–96 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brauers, W., Zavadskas, E.K.: The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control. Cybern. 35(2), 445–469 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.E., Marchetti, B.: Development and test of a new fuzzy-QFD approach for characterizing customers rating of extra virgin olive oil. Food Qual. Prefer. 24, 75–84 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan, F., Kumar, N., Kumar Tiwari, M., Lau, H.C.W., Choy, K.L.: Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 46(14), 3825–3857 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, C.H.: A new multi-criteria assessment model combining GRA techniques with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy-based TOPSIS method for sustainable building materials supplier selection. Sustainability 11(8), 2265 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cordell, A., & Thompson, I. (2019). Carter’s 10Cs of Supplier Appraisal. The procurement models handbook. Third edition, Routledge.

  9. Das, R., Smarandache, F., Tripathy, B.C.: Neutrosophic fuzzy matrices and some algebraic operation. Neutrosophic Sets Syst. 32, 401–409 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Das, S., Das, R., Tripathy, B.C.: Multi-criteria group decision making model using single-valued neutrosophic set. LogForum 16(3), 421–429 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Das, R., Tripathy, B.C.: Separation axioms on spatial topological space and spatial data analysis. Ann. Data Sci. 11(2), 411–423 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Deli, I., Subas, Y.: Single valued neutrosophic numbers and their applications to multicriteria decision making problem. Neutrosophic Sets Syst. 2(1), 1–13 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Boer, L., Labro, E., Morlacchi, P.: A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 7, 75–89 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dursun, M., Şener, Z.: An integrated DEMATEL-QFD model for medical supplier selection, world academy of science, engineering and technology. Int. J. Mech. Aerosp. Ind. Mechatr. Manuf. Eng. 8, 592–596 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gören, H.G.: A decision framework for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation with lost sales. J. Clean. Prod. 183, 1156–1169 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Görçün, Ö.F., Aytekin, A., Korucuk, S.: Fresh food supplier selection for global retail chains via bipolar neutrosophic methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 419, 138156 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ha, S.H., Krishnan, S.H.: A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain. Expert Syst. Appl. 34, 1303–1311 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ho, W., Xu, W., Dey, P.K.: Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202, 16–24 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jadidi, O., Hong, T.S., Firouzi, F., Yusuff, R.M., Zulkifli, N.: TOPSIS and fuzzy multi-objective model integration for supplier selection problem. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng.. 31, 762 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karsak, E.E., Dursun, M.: An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data. Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 6995–7004 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaya, R., Yet., B.: Building Bayesian networks based on DEMATEL for multiple criteria decision problems: a supplier selection case study. Expert Syst. Appl. 134, 234–248 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kersuliene, V., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z.: Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 11(2), 243–258 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kilincci, O., Onal, S.A.: Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 9656–9664 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumaraswamy, A.H., Bhattacharya, A., Kumar, V., & Brady, M. (2011). An integrated QFD-TOPSIS methodology for supplier selection in SMEs, in: 2011 Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation, CIMSiM. pp. 271–276.

  25. Lee, E.-K., Ha, S., Kim, S.-K.: Supplier selection and management system considering relationships in supply chain management. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 48, 307–318 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, Y.-T., Wu, W.-W., Tzeng, G.-H.: An effective decision-making method using a combined QFD and ANP approach. WSEAS Trans. Bus. Econ. 12, 541–551 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Menon, R.R., Ravi, V.: Using AHP-TOPSIS methodologies in the selection of sustainable suppliers in an electronics supply chain. Cleaner Mater. 5, 100130 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Önüt, S., Soner Kara, S., Isik, E.: Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: a case study for a telecommunication company. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 3887–3895 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.-H.: Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(2), 445–455 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Oroojeni, M.J.M., Darvishi, M., Oroojeni, M.J.A.: Green supplier selection for the steel industry using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study of Khouzestan steel company. Sustainable Futures 2, 100012 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rajesh, G., Malliga, P.: Supplier selection based on AHP QFD methodology. Procedia Eng. 64, 1283–1292 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Saaty, T.L. (1988). What is the analytic hierarchy process? In: mathematical Models for Decision Supported. Springer, pp 109–121

  33. Smarandache, F. (2013). A unifying field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic. Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic set, Neutrosophic Probability and statistics, American research press, Rehoboth, Fourth Edition

  34. Shil, B., Sinha, P., Tripathy, B.C., Das, S.: VNS based MADM-strategy under possibility environment. Ann. Data Sci. 10(6), 1571–1582 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tavana, M., Shaabani, A., di Caprio, D., Amiri, M.: An integrated and comprehensive fuzzy multicriteria model for supplier selection in digital supply chains. Sustain. Operat. Comput. 2, 149–169 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, Z., Cai, Q., Wei, G.: Modified TODIM method based on cumulative prospect theory with Type-2 neutrosophic number for green supplier selection. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 126, 106843 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yazdani, M., Ebadi Torkayesh, A., Stević, Ž, Chatterjee, P., Asgharieh Ahari, S., Hernandez, V.D.: An interval valued neutrosophic decision-making structure for sustainable supplier selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 183, 115354 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control. 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zouggari, A., Benyoucef, L.: Simulation based fuzzy TOPSIS approach for group multi-criteria supplier selection problem. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 25, 507–519 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization and Methodology: [Mehdi Seifbarghy]. Writing, reviewing and editing: [Mehdi Seifbarghy, Mohsen Hamidi].

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Hamidi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agreed with the content and gave consent to submit the work.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seifbarghy, M., Hamidi, M. Supplier selection in Neutrosophic environment with a hybrid fuzzy decision-making method. OPSEARCH (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-025-01030-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-025-01030-9

Keywords