Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:07:35 -0700 | | From | Srinivas Pandruvada <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] bitops: Introduce BIT_ULL |
| |
On 09/19/2013 09:48 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 09:00:34AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >> Adding BIT(x) equivalent for unsigned long long type, BIT_ULL(x). >> >> Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> >> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> >> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> >> --- >> include/linux/bitops.h | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h >> index a3b6b82..34e9e94 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/bitops.h >> +++ b/include/linux/bitops.h >> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ >> >> #ifdef __KERNEL__ >> #define BIT(nr) (1UL << (nr)) >> +#define BIT_ULL(nr) (1ULL << (nr)) > We already have BIT_64 for that. > The current definition for BIT_64 is in arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h. I feel it should be applicable for all architectures and move to some common file.
Thanks, Srinivas
|  |