[go: up one dir, main page]

lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 5/6] bitops: Introduce BIT_ULL
On 09/19/2013 09:48 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 09:00:34AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>> Adding BIT(x) equivalent for unsigned long long type, BIT_ULL(x).
>>
>> Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/bitops.h | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
>> index a3b6b82..34e9e94 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bitops.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>>
>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>> #define BIT(nr) (1UL << (nr))
>> +#define BIT_ULL(nr) (1ULL << (nr))
> We already have BIT_64 for that.
>
The current definition for BIT_64 is in arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h. I
feel it should be applicable for all architectures and move to some
common file.

Thanks,
Srinivas


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-19 19:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog