On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:59:34 +0100 Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:41:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > Obtained from where?  There are a whole pile of fixes resulting from
> > > review and linux-next testing.  Are they included?
> > 
> > -next and yes.  The trivial ones - folded into the commits they are fixing
> > (I mean, ones directly following the commit being fixed).  The rest included
> > as individual commits.
> > 
> > I'm looking through the DCACHE_LRU_LIST mess right now...
> 
> It's not that bad, actually; I think the variant I've pushed right now
> (vfs.git#for-next, head at f5e1dd34561e0fb06400b378d595198918833021) should
> be doing the right thing.  It ought to cover everything in your branch
> in -next from "fs: bump inode and dentry counters to long" on to the
> end of queue.

That's the correct starting point.  The end point should be
"staging/lustre/libcfs: cleanup linux-mem.h".