Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:44:15 -0700 | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown |
| |
On 09/10/2013 12:17 PM, David Lang wrote: >> >> In theory these blobs are traceable to a manufacturer. It's not really >> an indication that it's "safe" more than it's an indication that it >> hasn't been changed. But I haven't chased this very hard yet because >> of below... > > well, not if you are trying to defend against root breaking in to the > machine. >
And we have at least some drivers where we even have the firmware in the Linux kernel tree, and thus aren't opaque blobs at all.
I suspect we'll need, at some point, a way for vendors that aren't already doing signatures on their firmware in a device-specific way to do so in a kernel-supported way. The easiest (in terms of getting vendors to play along, not necessarily technically) might be a PGP signature (either inline or standalone) and have the public key as part of the driver?
-hpa
|  |