[go: up one dir, main page]

Modlog

/c/Queer_IRL Modlog
TimemodAction
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment Ahhh, I see now. Gender and sexuality are spectrums right up until you need to use them as a tool for tribalism. > it's not called the -S community because it isn't about them. Lmfao what??? You literally just defined it by the exclusion of straight people? How can you wrap your definition entirely around cishet norms while claiming it's not about them? That's the black/white rhetoric that drives dumb wedges like bi-erasure and trans exclusion. It ceases being a community and turns into a sterile label. by stickly@lemmy.world
reason: Thread Cleanup
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment It doesn't do that. The + is for all sexualities ***other*** than straight because straight people have literally the rest of the planet. We have nothing. We have created our own community in order to bond in that regard because we've been pushed out of everywhere else or have our lives threatened. An ally is an ally by *not being part of the community but supporting it.* So Straight people cannot call themselves an Ally at the same time as claiming they're part of the community. And it's not called the -S community because *it isn't about them.* I'm not getting upset at "some random comment" I'm pointing out that it's literally indicative of the problem pointed out in the post. by Dazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Thread Cleanup
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment The + does not, in fact, mean "every single person on earth that is not included on the rest of the list". by ratsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
reason: Thread Cleanup
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment > adding an S to the LGBTQ+ acronym means that the acronym just stands for the entirety of the human race I mean... The _+_ already does that. If your definition is only defined by the exclusion of cishet then just rename it to ¬S or something. If it's based on something more (acceptance, inclusion, unity, allyship, etc...) then why bother getting upset at some random comment like this. _You_ get to choose your personal community; you're under no obligation to tolerate any specific cishet/queer person. by stickly@lemmy.world
reason: Thread Cleanup
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment You're clearly just here to antagonize. Not interested. by Dazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Thread Cleanup
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment Relax. by Krudler@lemmy.world
reason: Thread Cleanup
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment I'm pretty sure you're the one who needs to reflect here. It's not supportive to say "Include the abuser". by Dazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Thread Cleanup
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment I'm gender fluid myself. You people in this sub SERIOUSLY need to meditate and reflect Get a grip, actually. by Krudler@lemmy.world
reason: Incivility
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment I am chill. I just don't like people disrespecting the queer community. by Dazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Thread Cleanup
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment Nah. It's a clumsy effort to bond. Chill the F out. by Krudler@lemmy.world
reason: Incivility
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment This is not lovely or misguided. It's *extreme* arrogance. "Hi, I know that you've had to make a community because specifically of the behavior of cishet people but now you've gotta let us in." No. We really don't. Moreover, putting the S at the beginning just goes to show how less important we are in comparison to them. The acronym has been around for a while and the L is always at the beginning because of how lesbians were among the few willing to treat gay men during the AIDS crisis. Insisting that you be allowed into a group that was created due to the hatred from your own group is insanity. Demanding that you be given an honorific goes to show that nothing was learned and the community ***must*** remain without cishet peoples involvement. Especially when the insistence of adding an S to the LGBTQ+ acronym means that the acronym just stands for *the entirety of the human race*, therefore nullifying the existence of our community. You say that it's misguided but lovely but that 'only queer' people could be angry about it. If you're not a queer person yourself then you have literally no right to a say in our response. by Dazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Thread Cleanup
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment You are actually stupid. A misguided straight person clumsily attempts to express inclusion.... You go snake. Take your meds. by Krudler@lemmy.world
reason: Incivility
19 days ago
mod
Removed Comment Only queer people could take be angry about a lovely but mildly misguided sentiment like this. by Krudler@lemmy.world
reason: Queerphobia
19 days ago
mod
Banned Krudler@lemmy.world from the community Queer_IRL@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Incivility and Queerphobia
expires: 5 days ago
19 days ago
mod
Banned bklyn@piefed.social from the community Queer_IRL@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Alt Account for Homes@piefed.world
19 days ago
mod
Banned homes@piefed.world from the community Queer_IRL@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Vote Manipulation with Alt Account bklyn@piefed.social
21 days ago
mod
Unbanned Serinus@lemmy.world from the community Queer_IRL@lemmy.dbzer0.com
21 days ago
mod
Banned Serinus@lemmy.world from the community Queer_IRL@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Ban evasion (aka Rhoeri)
4 months ago
mod
Unbanned SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world from the community Queer_IRL@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Mistaken on zero engagement in communities
4 months ago
mod
Banned SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world from the community Queer_IRL@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Zero engagement in communities other than downvotes // Alt account of Schmidtster //
5 months ago
mod
Removed Post We Came Back Home… and Found Only Rubble 💔
reason: Not the place for this type of post - Try MutualAid or DirectDonations
5 months ago
mod
Banned Hugin@lemmy.world from the community Queer_IRL@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: No interaction with community except for constant downvotes
6 months ago
mod
Banned TrickDacy@lemmy.world from the community Queer_IRL@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Syncing Ban: Troll
6 months ago
mod
Removed Comment Yep, nobody can disagree with you unless theyre fundamentally irrational or not even a person in the first place. Why think when you have thought terminating cliches? by outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Rule 1 + Established Troll
6 months ago
mod
Banned outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com from the community Queer_IRL@lemmy.dbzer0.com
expires: 5 months ago
6 months ago
mod
Removed Comment Its not their fault, but straight cis *people* are vanishingly rare. There's no intentionality no self awareness no consciousness to them. Theyre all reflex, all reaction, all conditioned responses because the conditioned response fits them well enough they never have any drive to deviate and become/create themselves. The ones that do achieve self awareness are always marginalized somehow. I guess because all that stuff is discouraged. by outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Rule 1 + Established Troll