[go: up one dir, main page]

Modlog

/c/privacy Modlog
TimemodAction
24 days ago
mod
Banned _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Posting transphobic spam in trans communities. First and last warning.
expires: 17 days ago
27 days ago
mod
Banned EhabAbeer99 [none/use name]@hexbear.net from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Off topic posting
27 days ago
mod
Removed Post Day 4 with no donations — a mother from Gaza asking for help for her children
reason: Off topic
1 month ago
mod
Banned macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Transphobia
1 month ago
mod
Banned Bloomcole@lemmy.world from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: DM trolling and harassment, including threats of violence.
1 month ago
mod
Removed Comment Aww, it's too stupid to follow a few paragraphs so it has to make a meme. by null@piefed.nullspace.lol
reason: Uncivil
1 month ago
mod
Removed Comment What's your favorite flavor of crayon? by null@piefed.nullspace.lol
reason: Uncivil
1 month ago
mod
Banned yoasif@lemmy.world from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: spammer
2 months ago
mod
Banned SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Instance rule #8 defense of zionism, painting Palestinians as terrorists.
2 months ago
mod
Banned Bloomcole@lemmy.world from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Changing to temp ban
expires: 1 month ago
2 months ago
mod
Unbanned Bloomcole@lemmy.world from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
2 months ago
mod
Banned Bloomcole@lemmy.world from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: User harassment
4 months ago
mod
Banned Miaou@jlai.lu from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: No TERFs
4 months ago
mod
Banned Rhoeri@lemmy.world from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Bad jacketing, making baseless accusations
6 months ago
mod
Removed Post He Would've Escaped - How The FBI Really Caught Tyler Robinson
reason: Use of X's links, as well as providing 0 value content inside the post itself, forcing you to view a channel
8 months ago
mod
Banned fishos@lemmy.world from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: transphobia
expires: 7 months ago
8 months ago
mod
Banned Dasus@lemmy.world from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Constant bad-jacketing. Literally thinks half of lemmy is russian bots (wtf lol)
expires: 6 months ago
8 months ago
mod
Removed Post [Meta] FYI, !privacy@progamming.dev is now the most active community per month after the lemmy.ml one - Edit: the official community is now at programming.dev
reason: No response by blaze, and i changed my mind
8 months ago
mod
Banned jouhija@sopuli.xyz from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: nazi, racist, harassment.
8 months ago
mod
Banned jouhija@sopuli.xyz from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: racism, stalking
9 months ago
mod
Banned SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
9 months ago
mod
Banned plyth@feddit.org from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: literally defending fascism what the fuck
9 months ago
mod
Removed Post Google is tracking you even when you use DuckDuckGo
reason: misleading
10 months ago
mod
Banned JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: blatantly denying genocide
10 months ago
mod
Banned Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: Please lay off the low-effort posts
expires: 9 months ago
10 months ago
mod
Banned swelter_spark@reddthat.com from the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: arguing about AI csam
expires: 9 months ago
11 months ago
mod
Removed Comment *Permanently Deleted* by loomy
reason: R1
11 months ago
mod
Removed Comment if you think your average linux distro is trustworthy, you're mad. there's a tons of binary blobs, not to mention all the known and unknown hardware backdooers that you can't remove by running linux. most of the software your average user installs is untrustworthy as well. the security model of linux is outdated at best, no proper isolation of programs. the linux kernel is leaky as heck and filled with tons of bloat. You can get a Intel ME disabled laptop or a 15 year old one one that never had it, then put on some FSF approved OS that bans closed source software and compiles everything from scratch, isolates every program like with jails or Qubes or one of the newfangled container based OSes and tunnels all your internet traffic through some sorf of anonymization layer like Tor or I2P and ideally it's all happening in memory only and never writes to disk. But then again we know there are hidden microcontrollers with full memory access hidden behind obscure instructions in CPUs. You can't tell me those aren't insane lengths. Practically speaking there is no such thing as a "trustworthy" computer and suggeting linux magically makes it trustworthy is laughable. Completely ridiculous. You need hardware disconnects on all sensors and physical obstruction of devices like cameras in order to have some level of certainty that they aren't being misused. by DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
reason: Community rule 3
11 months ago
mod
Removed Comment if you think your average linux distro is trustworthy, you're mad. there's a tons of binary blobs, not to mention all the known and unknown hardware backdooers that you can't remove by running linux. most of the software your average user installs is untrustworthy as well. the security model of linux is outdated at best, no proper isolation of programs. the linux kernel is leaky as heck and filled with tons of bloat. You can get a Intel ME disabled laptop or a 15 year old one one that never had it, then put on some FSF approved OS that bans closed source software and compiles everything from scratch, isolates every program like with jails or Qubes or one of the newfangled container based OSes and tunnels all your internet traffic through some sorf of anonymization layer like Tor or I2P and ideally it's all happening in memory only and never writes to disk. But then again we know there are hidden microcontrollers with full memory access hidden behind obscure instructions in CPUs. You can't tell me those aren't insane lengths. Practically speaking there is no such thing as a "trustworthy" computer and suggeting linux magically makes it trustworthy is laughable. Completely ridiculous. You need hardware disconnects on all sensors and physical obstruction of devices like cameras in order to have some level of certainty that they aren't being misused. by DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
reason: Community rule 3
11 months ago
mod
Removed Comment If this is for surveillance, it’s an absolute nothingburger. Your face is *public data*, not something protected by privacy. Period. Your boarding pass is already tracking your location at a specific time, so the photo doesn’t do anything about tracking either. The only practical use for this is quick identity verification. I will be very happy to change my mind if someone can give me a *specific* privacy violation, but no one has said anything except vague murmurs about “tracking”. Now if they [require you to unlock your phone](https://www.ncesc.com/do-you-have-to-unlock-your-phone-for-tsa/)? Yeah. That’s a BIG fucking privacy violation. by Pennomi@lemmy.world
reason: rule 3
11 months ago
mod
Removed Comment This is basically fear mongering. You're worried about what they might do rather than what they are doing, which is not keeping the pics taken at kiosks. This is even mentioned in the article. I'd certainly be worried about any plans they have, but skipping the pics now isn't doing anything for either party unless you don't believe what they say. Which is fair enough, but you'd need to provide a reason to doubt it. by Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
reason: rule 3
11 months ago
mod
Removed Comment Oh no the government might get access to my picture, which they already have access to! by Pennomi@lemmy.world
reason: rule 3
11 months ago
mod
Removed Comment You can opt out, here's why! ... The government might use your picture for something nefarious in the future we can't even think of an example of besides real-time tracking. ooooOOOOOoooOooo. You are on candid camera every time you're in the airport guys. You're probably carrying a tracking device in your pocket already. This article doesn't say anything about anything, it's slop. by dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
reason: rule 3
11 months ago
mod
Removed Comment Better start wearing burka going forward if u think TSA face recognition is taking your privacy away. There are 100s of camera in airport that already know who u are and what you are boarding. And this was implemented like 20 years ago right after 911 by GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
reason: rule 3
1 year ago
mod
Removed Post Weaponized Words: Uyghur Language Software Hijacked to Deliver Malware - The Citizen Lab
reason: unrelated to privacy
1 year ago
mod
Unlocked Post Help people trying to circumvent censorship by running a Snowflake proxy!
1 year ago
mod
Locked Post Help people trying to circumvent censorship by running a Snowflake proxy!
1 year ago
mod
Removed Comment [@LWD@lemm.ee](https://lemm.ee/u/LWD) >But I find your posts to be unconstructive in general, so I’ll repeat the exact same criticism I made last time, and hope you heed it: >Consider switching up your exclusive “China Bad” posting a little. These articles are getting so obscure, that you probably had to peel through a good amount of stuff that people [in the privacy community] would find way more relevant. I find your comments to be unconstructive in general, so I'll repeat the exact same criticism I made last time, and hope you heed it: Consider switching your exclusive "The West bad, China bad okay" posting a little. These comments are getting so obscure, that you probably had to peel only through some propaganda channels that people [in any community] don't find relevant at all. by Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org
reason: Breaks community rule 1
1 year ago
mod
Removed Post Meta announces always online DRM for all existing and future Quest VR devices
reason: 2yo article which turned out to not happen
1 year ago
mod
Removed Comment So easily controlled 🤡 by trevor (he/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
reason: Trolling
1 year ago
mod
Removed Post If you cross into Germany, the gestappo is back. Germany is no longer Schengen (in effect)
reason: what?
1 year ago
mod
Removed Post Google Maps can soon scan your screenshots to plan your vacation
reason: Sorry, repost (rule 4)
1 year ago
mod
Removed Comment You can get numbers for verification online. No need for buying sim cards. Heres my referral :) https://sms-man.com/?ref=qPLi0ekHzn_c Or you can just ask someone to buy a sim card for you... by LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de
reason: posting refereal link for some service
1 year ago
mod
Removed Post Toward a Passwordless Future
reason: Repost from two days ago
1 year ago
mod
Removed Comment > since if I lose the device they’re connected to then I get locked out myself. lmao that's the whole point. You __can't__ connect/logon without the second factor, which you've lost. This is intentional and by design because _it's secure_. Giving you a plethora of restoration options just increases your attack surface. What's the point of 2FA if I can impersonate you, say I lost my 2FA device, and have them reset your account? Now I just have to brute force your password and I'm in. 2FA no longer helps you. Software based 2FA is superior and you can easily take your seed string to multiple 2FA systems. Like if you use Bitwarden as a password solution, you can import your 2FA seed into Bitwarden to have your 2FA TOTP within Bitwarden in addition to your phone or whatever other software you use. This way, if you lose your phone you can still login. There are solutions and ultimately it's up to you to ensure that you have access to your account not because services are mean and want to hurt you, but because you're a big boy. They give you security tools and how you use them is up to you. ----------------- As a CEH, this community consistently proves time and time again that they know next to nothing about privacy or security... by Xanza@lemm.ee
reason: Rule 1: be civil please.
1 year ago
mod
Removed Comment > Are you really sitting here trying to argue that big tech companies like Google and Microsoft somehow has our best interests at heart No, I'm going to sit here and argue that you're a big boy blaming other people for your own mistakes. If Google is so _obviously evil and out to get you_ then don't use them. If you do, then that's your own fault, number one. Number two, you sound like some teenager that's yelling at their mommy because they lost their last $20 bill in the laundry. If you're so pissed, then do your own damn laundry... Software based TOTP have plaintext seeds that are portable and you can add in multiple, hell, even hundreds of devices if you want. Why you __choose__ not to do that isn't anyone's fault but your own. That's how I do it. And you could punch me in the dick and steal my phone right now and I could have my Google password changed before you even get back to your house because I'm not a fuckin' idiot. I don't keep all my eggs in one basket, like you do, apparently. Simple fact of the matter is, is that you have all the tools to make this a complete non-issue and actively choose to make it an issue for yourself... I'm not defending 2FA as perfect. It of course has flaws. But the portability of TOTP seeds isn't one of them. Fix yourself before you critique others. by Xanza@lemm.ee
reason: Rule 1: be civil please
1 year ago
mod
Restored Post Internxt Drive Becomes First Cloud Storage with Post-Quantum Encryption
1 year ago
mod
Restored Post LibreWolf is to Firefox what BetterBird is to Thunderbird?
1 year ago
mod
Restored Post Mozilla revises Firefox Terms & Privacy Notice to address user concerns over data privacy
1 year ago
mod
Restored Post All The Alternatives to Firefox
1 year ago
mod
Removed Post Help: Irasutoya.com does not opens in Ironfox (Android)
reason: Sorry, this isn't privacy related but fits !firefox@lemmy.world more
1 year ago
mod
Removed Post Mozilla revises Firefox Terms & Privacy Notice to address user concerns over data privacy
reason: Sorry, but same post as https://lemmy.zip/post/33277112
1 year ago
mod
Removed Post All The Alternatives to Firefox
reason: Good but unrelated to privacy
1 year ago
mod
Removed Post LibreWolf is to Firefox what BetterBird is to Thunderbird?
reason: Not privacy related
1 year ago
mod
Removed Post Internxt Drive Becomes First Cloud Storage with Post-Quantum Encryption
reason: Advertisement without claims
1 year ago
mod
Removed Post Fight for privacy. To protect all other rights.
reason: Repost of a post 6 days ago
1 year ago
mod
Removed Comment Because his MS paycheck didn't get withheld...yet. by Chakravanti@monero.town
reason: Please don't accuse others of being paid actors
1 year ago
mod
Removed Comment If your intention was to make baseless accusations while ignoring the topic at hand, then yes, it was indeed pointless. by Ulrich@feddit.org
reason: Racism
1 year ago
mod
Removed Comment You can keep reiterating that I need to read more about your strawman arguments and I am going to keep ignoring them. Again, come back when you want to have a discussion about the OP. by Ulrich@feddit.org
reason: Racism
1 year ago
mod
Removed Comment What you are attempting to inform me of is not related to the topic at hand, since that topic is "skin color" and not "race". The only mental gymnastics here is you accusing me of racism when I talk about skin color while simultaneously telling me that the 2 are not related. by Ulrich@feddit.org
reason: Racism
1 year ago
mod
Removed Comment I said "putting aside" because I don't want to discuss it, as it's not relevant to the OP, as it does not mention "race" (which also makes it extra ironic that you called me "racist" when, by your own statements, no one was talking about race). > Race being culturally constructed does not prove a link between skin color and cultural behavior. No, you can use simple observation skills to determine that. You've never heard of "black culture"? Never seen BET? Never heard a black person speak? Never heard racial comedy? Never heard of black neighborhoods? by Ulrich@feddit.org
reason: Racism
1 year ago
mod
Removed Post Behavioural Patterns Are the New Skin Colour
reason: duplicate
1 year ago
mod
Appointed fxomt@piefed.social as a mod to the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
1 year ago
mod
Unlocked Post *Permanently Deleted*
1 year ago
mod
Locked Post *Permanently Deleted*
1 year ago
mod
Removed fxomt@lemm.ee as a mod to the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
1 year ago
mod
Appointed shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com as a mod to the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
1 year ago
mod
Appointed Otter@lemmy.ca as a mod to the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
1 year ago
mod
Appointed fxomt [abandoned account]@lemmy.dbzer0.com as a mod to the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
1 year ago
mod
Removed shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com as a mod to the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
1 year ago
mod
Appointed fxomt@lemm.ee as a mod to the community Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com