i hope this doesn’t violate rule 4 but it’s incredibly disconcerting that rule 4 tries to conflate certain things with transphobia as if they’re even in the same ballpark. cause why are you even here if you believe everyone’s interactions with the market are entirely voluntary?
Trans people are protected site-wide and transphobia is banned site-wide, so the inclusion of TERFs in the community rule banning exclusionary “feminisms” doesn’t imply that transphobia is equivalent to anything.
i don’t really see what one has to do with the other. sex-trade abolitionism is banned sitewide too as far as i can tell. and the rule still equates one with the other.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
i hope this doesn’t violate rule 4 but it’s incredibly disconcerting that rule 4 tries to conflate certain things with transphobia as if they’re even in the same ballpark. cause why are you even here if you believe everyone’s interactions with the market are entirely voluntary?
Trans people are protected site-wide and transphobia is banned site-wide, so the inclusion of TERFs in the community rule banning exclusionary “feminisms” doesn’t imply that transphobia is equivalent to anything.
i don’t really see what one has to do with the other. sex-trade abolitionism is banned sitewide too as far as i can tell. and the rule still equates one with the other.