From 4bdb6c1cd4a6bb5b72901a8597c76d0f0dd15a03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hideyuki Oide Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:23:04 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] flagging rule: added SENSOR_CLEAVAGE and SENSOR_SOFT_BREAKDOWN --- viewer/json-lists/flagging_rule.json | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/viewer/json-lists/flagging_rule.json b/viewer/json-lists/flagging_rule.json index f93ba8c43..fd20d0a6e 100644 --- a/viewer/json-lists/flagging_rule.json +++ b/viewer/json-lists/flagging_rule.json @@ -252,6 +252,34 @@ "note": " This flag is INFO-ONLY: Checking this does not block QC stages to proceed." }, + { + "header_question": "Q: Does the sensor have a cleaverage between FE chips?", + "stage": null, + "flags": [ + { + "code": "SENSOR_CLEAVAGE", + "stage": null, + "description": "picture of the cleavage should be uploaded" + } + ], + "rule": "immediate_graveyard", + "note": " If you check this, the module will move to GRAVEYARD." + }, + + { + "header_question": "Q: Does the IV sugggest a soft breakdown behaviour?", + "stage": null, + "flags": [ + { + "code": "SENSOR_SOFT_BREAKDOWN", + "stage": null, + "description": "do a detailed visual inspcection of the sensor between the FE chips and check if a cleavage exists. picture of the cleavage should be uploaded" + } + ], + "rule": "unhappy", + "note": " If you check this, the module will move to UNHAPPY." + }, + { "header_question": "Q: Does the module show core-column (“CC”) issues that cannot be masked with existing tools, appearing only during tuning?", "stage": null, -- GitLab