[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Supersymmetric models with minimal flavor violation and their running

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We revisit the formulation of the principle of minimal flavor violation (MFV) in the minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model, both at moderate and large tan β, and with or without new CP-violating phases. We introduce a counting rule which keeps track of the highly hierarchical structure of the Yukawa matrices. In this manner, we are able to control systematically which terms can be discarded in the soft SUSY breaking part of the Lagrangian. We argue that for the implementation of this counting rule, it is convenient to introduce a new basis of matrices in which both the squark (and slepton) mass terms as well as the trilinear couplings can be expanded. We derive the RGE for the MFV parameters and show that the beta functions also respect the counting rule. For moderate tan β, we provide explicit analytic solutions of these RGE and illustrate their behavior by analyzing the neighborhood (also switching on new phases) of the SPS-1a benchmark point. We then show that even in the case of large tan β, the RGE remain valid and that the analytic solutions obtained for moderate tan β still allow us to understand the most important features of the running of the parameters, as illustrated with the help of the SPS-4 benchmark point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.J. Hall, L. Randall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2939 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. G. D’Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori, A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B 645, 155 (2002). arXiv:hep-ph/0207036

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Ciuchini, G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, G.F. Giudice, Nucl. Phys. B 534, 3 (1998). arXiv:hep-ph/9806308

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Ali, D. London, Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 687 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9903535

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A.J. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager, L. Silvestrini, Phys. Lett. B 500, 161 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0007085

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. S.P. Martin, arXiv:hep-ph/9709356 (1997)

  7. P. Paradisi, M. Ratz, R. Schieren, C. Simonetto, arXiv:0805.3989 [hep-ph]

  8. B.C. Allanach, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143, 305 (2002). arXiv:hep-ph/0104145

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. R.S. Chivukula, H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B 188, 99 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Nikolidakis, C. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 77, 015021 (2008). arXiv:0710.3129 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Nikolidakis, PhD thesis, University of Bern, 2008

  12. L.J. Hall, V.A. Kostelecky, S. Raby, Nucl. Phys. B 267, 415 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Isidori, F. Mescia, P. Paradisi, C. Smith, S. Trine, J. High Energy Phys. 0608, 064 (2006). arXiv:hep-ph/0604074

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras, D. Guadagnoli, J. High Energy Phys. 0711, 065 (2007). arXiv:hep-ph/0703200

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. F. Gabbiani, E. Gabrielli, A. Masiero, L. Silvestrini, Nucl. Phys. B 477, 321 (1996). arXiv:hep-ph/9604387

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Ciuchini, A. Masiero, P. Paradisi, L. Silvestrini, S.K. Vempati, O. Vives, Nucl. Phys. B 783, 112 (2007). arXiv:hep-ph/0702144

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Bona et al. (UTfit Collaboration), arXiv:0803.0659 [hep-ph]

  18. G. Colangelo, G. Isidori, J. High Energy Phys. 9809, 009 (1998). arXiv:hep-ph/9808487

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Ellis, J.S. Lee, A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Rev. D 76, 115011 (2007). arXiv:0708.2079 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. S.P. Martin, M.T. Vaughn, Phys. Rev. D 50, 2282 (1994). arXiv:hep-ph/9311340

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. B.C. Allanach et al., in Proc. of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics, ed. by N. Graf, Snowmass, CO, 30 June—21 July 2001, p. P125. arXiv:hep-ph/0202233

  22. L.J. Hall, R. Rattazzi, U. Sarid, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7048 (1994). arXiv:hep-ph/9306309

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. A.J. Buras, P.H. Chankowski, J. Rosiek, L. Slawianowska, Nucl. Phys. B 659, 3 (2003). arXiv:hep-ph/0210145

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Antusch, M. Spinrath, arXiv:0804.0717 [hep-ph]

  25. V. Cirigliano, B. Grinstein, G. Isidori, M.B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B 728, 121 (2005). arXiv:hep-ph/0507001

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. B. Grinstein, V. Cirigliano, G. Isidori, M.B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B 763, 35 (2007). arXiv:hep-ph/0608123

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. W. Porod, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153, 275 (2003). arXiv:hep-ph/0301101

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colangelo, G., Nikolidakis, E. & Smith, C. Supersymmetric models with minimal flavor violation and their running. Eur. Phys. J. C 59, 75–98 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0796-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0796-y

Keywords