[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Primer
  • Published:

Nanofluidics

Abstract

Fluid transport at the nanoscale is ubiquitous in nature. However, rigorous study of fluid flow and structure in artificial nanopores only emerged relatively recently. Termed nanofluidics, the field is driven by the rise of nanomaterials and nanofabrication techniques and supported by theoretical progress beyond continuum fluid dynamics. Nanofluidics has a wide range of applications, such as nanopore sensing and membrane technologies for sieving and energy harvesting, leading to growth of the field. In this Primer, an overview of nanofluidic methods is provided, from the fabrication of the first nanopores to advanced functionalities, such as brain-inspired ionic computing. Focus is given to experimental approaches, including device fabrication and scale-up strategies, in addition to a discussion of limitations, margin for improvements and future directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

39,95 €

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Nanofluidic studies and harnessing of surface effects in confinement.
Fig. 2: Fabrication approaches for nanofluidic devices.
Fig. 3: Ion transport measurements and analysis.
Fig. 4: Liquid transport and structure measurements.
Fig. 5: Advanced nanofluidic functionalities.
Fig. 6: Scale-up.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gouaux, E. & MacKinnon, R. Principles of selective ion transport in channels and pumps. Science 310, 1461–1465 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Agre, P. et al. Aquaporin water channels — from atomic structure to clinical medicine. J. Physiol. 542, 3–16 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kitchen, P. et al. Beyond water homeostasis: diverse functional roles of mammalian aquaporins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1850, 2410–2421 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yellen, G. The voltage-gated potassium channels and their relatives. Nature 419, 35–42 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, J. et al. Ion-beam sculpting at nanometre length scales. Nature 412, 166–169 (2001). This paper reports early fabrication of nanoscale holes.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stein, D., Kruithof, M. & Dekker, C. Surface-charge-governed ion transport in nanofluidic channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 035901 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, C. Y., Choi, W., Han, J.-H. & Strano, M. S. Coherence resonance in a single-walled carbon nanotube ion channel. Science 329, 1320–1324 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Siria, A. et al. Giant osmotic energy conversion measured in a single transmembrane boron nitride nanotube. Nature 494, 455–458 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Feng, J. et al. Electrochemical reaction in single layer MoS2: nanopores opened atom by atom. Nano Lett. 15, 3431–3438 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhardwaj, A. et al. Fabrication of angstrom-scale two-dimensional channels for mass transport. Nat. Protoc. 19, 240–280 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dikin, D. A. et al. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature 448, 457–460 (2007). This paper reports the first fabrication of graphene oxide membranes.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Engst, C. R. et al. DNA origami nanopores. Nano Lett. 12, 512–517 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu, J. & Wang, H. Emerging porous framework material-based nanofluidic membranes toward ultimate ion separation. Matter 4, 2810–2830 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Holt, J. K. et al. Fast mass transport through sub-2-nanometer carbon nanotubes. Science 312, 1034–1037 (2006). To our knowledge, this paper shows the first experimental observation of fast water flows in carbon nanotubes.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Secchi, E. et al. Massive radius-dependent flow slippage in carbon nanotubes. Nature 537, 210–213 (2016). This paper reports the observation of giant slippage in single carbon nanotubes.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Garaj, S. et al. Graphene as a subnanometre trans-electrode membrane. Nature 467, 190–193 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Feng, J. et al. Single-layer MoS2 nanopores as nanopower generators. Nature 536, 197–200 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Radha, B. et al. Molecular transport through capillaries made with atomic-scale precision. Nature 538, 222–225 (2016). To our knowledge, this is the first paper with 2D slits made by van der Waals assembly.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Emmerich, T. et al. Enhanced nanofluidic transport in activated carbon nanoconduits. Nat. Mater. 21, 696–702 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kasianowicz, J. J., Brandin, E., Branton, D. & Deamer, D. W. Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13770–13773 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Deamer, D., Akeson, M. & Branton, D. Three decades of nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 518–524 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Robin, P. et al. Long-term memory and synapse-like dynamics in two-dimensional nanofluidic channels. Science 379, 161–167 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marcotte, A., Mouterde, T., Niguès, A., Siria, A. & Bocquet, L. Mechanically activated ionic transport across single-digit carbon nanotubes. Nat. Mater. 19, 1057–1061 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Davis, S. J. et al. Pressure-induced enlargement and ionic current rectification in symmetric nanopores. Nano Lett. 20, 8089–8095 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kavokine, N., Bocquet, M.-L. & Bocquet, L. Fluctuation-induced quantum friction in nanoscale water flows. Nature 602, 84–90 (2022). This paper reports a quantum-based theory explaining the low water–carbon friction.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu, X., Principi, A., Tielrooij, K.-J., Bonn, M. & Kavokine, N. Electron cooling in graphene enhanced by plasmon–hydron resonance. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 898–904 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiong, T. et al. Neuromorphic functions with a polyelectrolyte-confined fluidic memristor. Science 379, 156–161 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Emmerich, T. et al. Nanofluidic logic with mechano-ionic memristive switches. Nat. Electron. 7, 271–278 (2024). To our knowledge, this paper reports the first logic circuit with nanofluidic memristors.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schoch, R. B., Han, J. & Renaud, P. Transport phenomena in nanofluidics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 839–883 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bocquet, L. & Charlaix, E. Nanofluidics, from bulk to interfaces. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1073–1095 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kavokine, N., Netz, R. R. & Bocquet, L. Fluids at the nanoscale: from continuum to subcontinuum transport. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 53, 377–410 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ying, Y.-L. et al. Nanopore-based technologies beyond DNA sequencing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 1136–1146 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Miles, B. N. et al. Single molecule sensing with solid-state nanopores: novel materials, methods, and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 15–28 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xue, L. et al. Solid-state nanopore sensors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 931–951 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gao, J., Feng, Y., Guo, W. & Jiang, L. Nanofluidics in two-dimensional layered materials: inspirations from nature. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 5400–5424 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Logan, B. E. & Elimelech, M. Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water. Nature 488, 313–319 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Siria, A., Bocquet, M.-L. & Bocquet, L. New avenues for the large-scale harvesting of blue energy. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 0091 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Macha, M., Marion, S., Nandigana, V. V. R. & Radenovic, A. 2D materials as an emerging platform for nanopore-based power generation. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 588–605 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, Z., Wen, L. & Jiang, L. Nanofluidics for osmotic energy conversion. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 622–639 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Storm, A. J., Chen, J. H., Ling, X. S., Zandbergen, H. W. & Dekker, C. Fabrication of solid-state nanopores with single-nanometre precision. Nat. Mater. 2, 537–540 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Karnik, R. et al. Electrostatic control of ions and molecules in nanofluidic transistors. Nano Lett. 5, 943–948 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Karnik, R., Duan, C., Castelino, K., Daiguji, H. & Majumdar, A. Rectification of ionic current in a nanofluidic diode. Nano Lett. 7, 547–551 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Siwy, Z. & Fuliński, A. Fabrication of a synthetic nanopore ion pump. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 198103 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Guo, W. et al. Energy harvesting with single-ion-selective nanopores: a concentration-gradient-driven nanofluidic power source. Adv. Funct. Mater. 20, 1339–1344 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bocquet, L. Nanofluidics coming of age. Nat. Mater. 19, 254–256 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Celebi, K. et al. Ultimate permeation across atomically thin porous graphene. Science 344, 289–292 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tunuguntla, R. H. et al. Enhanced water permeability and tunable ion selectivity in subnanometer carbon nanotube porins. Science 357, 792–796 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gopinadhan, K. et al. Complete steric exclusion of ions and proton transport through confined monolayer water. Science 363, 145–148 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Geim, A. K. & Grigorieva, I. V. van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 499, 419–425 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nair, R. R., Wu, H. A., Jayaram, P. N., Grigorieva, I. V. & Geim, A. K. Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak–tight graphene-based membranes. Science 335, 442–444 (2012). This paper reports very high water permeation across graphene oxide membranes.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ji, Y.-L. et al. Superfast water transport zwitterionic polymeric nanofluidic membrane reinforced by metal–organic frameworks. Adv. Mater. 33, 2102292 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lu, J. et al. Ultraselective monovalent metal ion conduction in a three-dimensional sub-1 nm nanofluidic device constructed by metal–organic frameworks. ACS Nano 15, 1240–1249 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang, J. et al. Advancing osmotic power generation by covalent organic framework monolayer. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 622–628 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu, Q. et al. Unit-cell-thick zeolitic imidazolate framework films for membrane application. Nat. Mater. 22, 1387–1393 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Park, H. G. & Jung, Y. Carbon nanofluidics of rapid water transport for energy applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 565–576 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mouterde, T. et al. Molecular streaming and its voltage control in ångström-scale channels. Nature 567, 87–90 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Bui, A. T., Thiemann, F. L., Michaelides, A. & Cox, S. J. Classical quantum friction at water–carbon interfaces. Nano Lett. 23, 580–587 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Capone, R., Blake, S., Rincon Restrepo, M., Yang, J. & Mayer, M. Designing nanosensors based on charged derivatives of gramicidin A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 9737–9745 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Butler, T. Z., Pavlenok, M., Derrington, I. M., Niederweis, M. & Gundlach, J. H. Single-molecule DNA detection with an engineered MspA protein nanopore. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20647–20652 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. Hernández-Ainsa, S. & Keyser, U. F. DNA origami nanopores: developments, challenges and perspectives. Nanoscale 6, 14121–14132 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. Mayer, S. F., Cao, C. & Dal Peraro, M. Biological nanopores for single-molecule sensing. iScience 25, 104145 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. Wei, R., Pedone, D., Zürner, A., Döblinger, M. & Rant, U. Fabrication of metallized nanopores in silicon nitride membranes for single-molecule sensing. Small 6, 1406–1414 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Thangaraj, V. et al. Detection of short ssDNA and dsDNA by current–voltage measurements using conical nanopores coated with Al2O3 by atomic layer deposition. Microchim. Acta 183, 1011–1017 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  64. Yameen, B. et al. Single conical nanopores displaying pH-tunable rectifying characteristics. Manipulating ionic transport with zwitterionic polymer brushes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 2070–2071 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Venkatesan, B. M. et al. Lipid bilayer coated Al2O3 nanopore sensors: towards a hybrid biological solid-state nanopore. Biomed. Microdev. 13, 671–682 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Galla, L. et al. Hydrodynamic slip on DNA observed by optical tweezers-controlled translocation experiments with solid-state and lipid-coated nanopores. Nano Lett. 14, 4176–4182 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. Yuzvinsky, T. D., Fennimore, A. M., Mickelson, W., Esquivias, C. & Zettl, A. Precision cutting of nanotubes with a low-energy electron beam. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 053109 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. Thiele, C. et al. Electron-beam-induced direct etching of graphene. Carbon 64, 84–91 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Traversi, F. et al. Detecting the translocation of DNA through a nanopore using graphene nanoribbons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 939–945 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. Chen, Y. Nanofabrication by electron beam lithography and its applications: a review. Microelectron. Eng. 135, 57–72 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Vieu, C. et al. Electron beam lithography: resolution limits and applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 164, 111–117 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. Jonsson, M. P., Dahlin, A. B., Feuz, L., Petronis, S. & Höök, F. Locally functionalized short-range ordered nanoplasmonic pores for bioanalytical sensing. Anal. Chem. 82, 2087–2094 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Briggs, K. et al. Kinetics of nanopore fabrication during controlled breakdown of dielectric membranes in solution. Nanotechnology 26, 084004 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. Graf, M. et al. Fabrication and practical applications of molybdenum disulfide nanopores. Nat. Protoc. 14, 1130–1168 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Gilboa, T., Zvuloni, E., Zrehen, A., Squires, A. H. & Meller, A. Automated, ultra-fast laser-drilling of nanometer scale pores and nanopore arrays in aqueous solutions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1900642 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Fried, J. P. et al. In situ solid-state nanopore fabrication. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 4974–4992 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Zvuloni, E., Zrehen, A., Gilboa, T. & Meller, A. Fast and deterministic fabrication of sub-5 nanometer solid-state pores by feedback-controlled laser processing. ACS Nano 15, 12189–12200 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Huang, S. et al. In situ nucleation-decoupled and site-specific incorporation of Å-scale pores in graphene via epoxidation. Adv. Mater. 34, 2206627 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Bondaz, L. et al. Selective photonic gasification of strained oxygen clusters on graphene for tuning pore size in the Å regime. JACS Au 3, 2844–2854 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Gösele, U. & Tong, Q.-Y. Semiconductor wafer bonding. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 215–241 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. Wang, H. Y., Foote, R. S., Jacobson, S. C., Schneibel, J. H. & Ramsey, J. M. Low temperature bonding for microfabrication of chemical analysis devices. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 45, 199–207 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. Novoselov, K. S., Mishchenko, A., Carvalho, A. & Castro Neto, A. H. 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures. Science 353, aac9439 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Schranghamer, T. F., Sharma, M., Singh, R. & Das, S. Review and comparison of layer transfer methods for two-dimensional materials for emerging applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 11032–11054 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Hirunpinyopas, W. et al. Desalination and nanofiltration through functionalized laminar MoS2 membranes. ACS Nano 11, 11082–11090 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ries, L. et al. Enhanced sieving from exfoliated MoS2 membranes via covalent functionalization. Nat. Mater. 18, 1112–1117 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. Chen, L. et al. Ion sieving in graphene oxide membranes via cationic control of interlayer spacing. Nature 550, 380–383 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  87. Abraham, J. et al. Tunable sieving of ions using graphene oxide membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 546–550 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  88. Burns, J. R., Seifert, A., Fertig, N. & Howorka, S. A biomimetic DNA-based channel for the ligand-controlled transport of charged molecular cargo across a biological membrane. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 152–156 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  89. Xing, Y., Dorey, A., Jayasinghe, L. & Howorka, S. Highly shape- and size-tunable membrane nanopores made with DNA. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 708–713 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  90. You, Y. et al. Angstrofluidics: walking to the limit. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 52, 189–218 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  91. Storm, A. J. et al. Fast DNA translocation through a solid-state nanopore. Nano Lett. 5, 1193–1197 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  92. Li, J., Gershow, M., Stein, D., Brandin, E. & Golovchenko, J. A. DNA molecules and configurations in a solid-state nanopore microscope. Nat. Mater. 2, 611–615 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  93. Xiao, K. et al. Enhanced stability and controllability of an ionic diode based on funnel-shaped nanochannels with an extended critical region. Adv. Mater. 28, 3345–3350 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Zhao, Y., Janot, J.-M., Balanzat, E. & Balme, S. Mimicking pH-gated ionic channels by polyelectrolyte complex confinement inside a single nanopore. Langmuir 33, 3484–3490 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Déjardin, P., Vasina, E. N., Berezkin, V. V., Sobolev, V. D. & Volkov, V. I. Streaming potential in cylindrical pores of poly(ethylene terephthalate) track-etched membranes: variation of apparent ζ potential with pore radius. Langmuir 21, 4680–4685 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Ma, T., Janot, J.-M. & Balme, S. Track-etched nanopore/membrane: from fundamental to applications. Small Methods 4, 2000366 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. van der Heyden, F. H. J., Stein, D. & Dekker, C. Streaming currents in a single nanofluidic channel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 116104 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  98. Kim, D.-K., Duan, C., Chen, Y.-F. & Majumdar, A. Power generation from concentration gradient by reverse electrodialysis in ion-selective nanochannels. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 9, 1215–1224 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Ohayon, S. et al. Full-length single protein molecules tracking and counting in thin silicon channels. Adv. Mater. 36, 2314319 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Yuan, Z. et al. Direct chemical vapor deposition synthesis of porous single-layer graphene membranes with high gas permeances and selectivities. Adv. Mater. 33, 2104308 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Griffin, E. et al. Proton and Li-ion permeation through graphene with eight-atom-ring defects. ACS Nano 14, 7280–7286 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Jain, T. et al. Heterogeneous sub-continuum ionic transport in statistically isolated graphene nanopores. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 1053–1057 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  103. Kidambi, P. R. et al. Facile fabrication of large-area atomically thin membranes by direct synthesis of graphene with nanoscale porosity. Adv. Mater. 30, 1804977 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Walker, M. I. et al. Extrinsic cation selectivity of 2D membranes. ACS Nano 11, 1340–1346 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Levita, G., Restuccia, P. & Righi, M. C. Graphene and MoS2 interacting with water: a comparison by ab initio calculations. Carbon 107, 878–884 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Cheng, C., Iyengar, S. A. & Karnik, R. Molecular size-dependent subcontinuum solvent permeation and ultrafast nanofiltration across nanoporous graphene membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 989–995 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  107. Secchi, E., Niguès, A., Jubin, L., Siria, A. & Bocquet, L. Scaling behavior for ionic transport and its fluctuations in individual carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 154501 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  108. Choi, W., Lee, C. Y., Ham, M.-H., Shimizu, S. & Strano, M. S. Dynamics of simultaneous, single ion transport through two single-walled carbon nanotubes: observation of a three-state system. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 203–205 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Choi, W. et al. Diameter-dependent ion transport through the interior of isolated single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nat. Commun. 4, 2397 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  110. Agrawal, K. V., Shimizu, S., Drahushuk, L. W., Kilcoyne, D. & Strano, M. S. Observation of extreme phase transition temperatures of water confined inside isolated carbon nanotubes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 267–273 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  111. Li, Z. et al. Breakdown of the Nernst–Einstein relation in carbon nanotube porins. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 177–183 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  112. Fornasiero, F. et al. Ion exclusion by sub-2-nm carbon nanotube pores. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17250–17255 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  113. Sakai, N. & Matile, S. Synthetic ion channels. Langmuir 29, 9031–9040 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Zheng, S.-P., Huang, L.-B., Sun, Z. & Barboiu, M. Self-assembled artificial ion-channels toward natural selection of functions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 566–597 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Barboiu, M. Artificial water channels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 11674–11676 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Song, W. & Kumar, M. Artificial water channels: toward and beyond desalination. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 25, 9–17 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Jubin, L., Poggioli, A., Siria, A. & Bocquet, L. Dramatic pressure-sensitive ion conduction in conical nanopores. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4063–4068 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  118. Nadappuram, B. P. et al. Nanoscale tweezers for single-cell biopsies. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 80–88 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  119. Leitao, S. M. et al. Spatially multiplexed single-molecule translocations through a nanopore at controlled speeds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 1078–1084 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  120. Fumagalli, L. et al. Anomalously low dielectric constant of confined water. Science 360, 1339–1342 (2018). This paper reports the reduced in-plane dielectric constant of interfacial water.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  121. Lee, C. et al. Osmotic flow through fully permeable nanochannels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 244501 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  122. Ronceray, N. et al. Liquid-activated quantum emission from pristine hexagonal boron nitride for nanofluidic sensing. Nat. Mater. 22, 1236–1242 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  123. Esfandiar, A. et al. Size effect in ion transport through ångström-scale slits. Science 358, 511–513 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  124. Keerthi, A. et al. Ballistic molecular transport through two-dimensional channels. Nature 558, 420–424 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  125. Goutham, S. et al. Beyond steric selectivity of ions using ångström-scale capillaries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 596–601 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  126. Liu, C. et al. Controllable van der Waals gaps by water adsorption. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 1–7 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  127. Ramirez, P., Gómez, V., Cervera, J., Mafe, S. & Bisquert, J. Synaptical tunability of multipore nanofluidic memristors. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 10930–10934 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Paulo, G. et al. Hydrophobically gated memristive nanopores for neuromorphic applications. Nat. Commun. 14, 8390 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  129. Sheng, Q., Xie, Y., Li, J., Wang, X. & Xue, J. Transporting an ionic-liquid/water mixture in a conical nanochannel: a nanofluidic memristor. Chem. Commun. 53, 6125–6127 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Soni, N., Chandra Verma, N., Talor, N. & Meller, A. Over 30-fold enhancement in DNA translocation dynamics through nanoscale pores coated with an anionic surfactant. Nano Lett. 23, 4609–4616 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  131. Zhou, Z. et al. Electrochemical-repaired porous graphene membranes for precise ion-ion separation. Nat. Commun. 15, 4006 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  132. Zhao, K. et al. Tuning pore size in graphene in the angstrom regime for highly selective ion–ion separation. ACS Nano 18, 5571–5580 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  133. Zhong, J. et al. Exploring anomalous fluid behavior at the nanoscale: direct visualization and quantification via nanofluidic devices. Acc. Chem. Res. 53, 347–357 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Shen, Y. et al. Highly permeable artificial water channels that can self-assemble into two-dimensional arrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 9810–9815 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  135. Xie, Q. et al. Fast water transport in graphene nanofluidic channels. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 238–245 (2018). This paper reports the observation of large slippage in 2D graphitic channels.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  136. Ronceray, N. et al. Elastocapillarity-driven 2D nano-switches enable zeptoliter-scale liquid encapsulation. Nat. Commun. 15, 185 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  137. Gilboa, T. & Meller, A. Optical sensing and analyte manipulation in solid-state nanopores. Analyst 140, 4733–4747 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  138. Heron, A. J., Thompson, J. R., Cronin, B., Bayley, H. & Wallace, M. I. Simultaneous measurement of ionic current and fluorescence from single protein pores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 1652–1653 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Ivankin, A. et al. Label-free optical detection of biomolecular translocation through nanopore arrays. ACS Nano 8, 10774–10781 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Laohakunakorn, N. et al. A Landau–Squire nanojet. Nano Lett. 13, 5141–5146 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  141. Secchi, E., Marbach, S., Niguès, A., Siria, A. & Bocquet, L. The Landau–Squire plume. J. Fluid Mech. 826, R3 (2017).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  142. Sharma, P. et al. A direct sensor to measure minute liquid flow rates. Nano Lett. 18, 5726–5730 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  143. Koenig, S. P., Wang, L., Pellegrino, J. & Bunch, J. S. Selective molecular sieving through porous graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 728–732 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  144. Wang, L. et al. Molecular valves for controlling gas phase transport made from discrete ångström-sized pores in graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 785–790 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  145. Sun, P. Z. et al. Limits on gas impermeability of graphene. Nature 579, 229–232 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  146. Zeng, Y. et al. Irreversible synthesis of an ultrastrong two-dimensional polymeric material. Nature 602, 91–95 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  147. Agrawal, K. V. et al. Fabrication, pressure testing, and nanopore formation of single-layer graphene membranes. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 14312–14321 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Deveci, S., Oksuz, Y., Birtane, T. & Oner, M. Application of constant volume–variable pressure (time-lag) method to measure oxygen gas diffusion through polypropylene pipes. Polym. Test. 55, 287–296 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Sahin, Z. E., Rahimalimamaghani, A., Gazzani, M. & Gallucci, F. Gas permeation through carbon membranes: model development and experimental validation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 50, 561–581 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  150. Marbach, S. & Bocquet, L. Osmosis, from molecular insights to large-scale applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 3102–3144 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Gubbiotti, A. et al. Electroosmosis in nanopores: computational methods and technological applications. Adv. Phys. X 7, 2036638 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  152. Hall, J. E. Access resistance of a small circular pore. J. Gen. Physiol. 66, 531–532 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Manghi, M. et al. Ionic conductance of carbon nanotubes: confronting literature data with nanofluidic theory. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 22943–22950 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Smeets, R. M. M., Keyser, U. F., Wu, M. Y., Dekker, N. H. & Dekker, C. Nanobubbles in solid-state nanopores. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 088101 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  155. Smeets, R. M. M., Keyser, U. F., Dekker, N. H. & Dekker, C. Noise in solid-state nanopores. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 417–421 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  156. Gravelle, S., Netz, R. R. & Bocquet, L. Adsorption kinetics in open nanopores as a source of low-frequency noise. Nano Lett. 19, 7265–7272 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  157. Vlassiouk, I. & Siwy, Z. S. Nanofluidic diode. Nano Lett. 7, 552–556 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  158. Daiguji, H., Oka, Y. & Shirono, K. Nanofluidic diode and bipolar transistor. Nano Lett. 5, 2274–2280 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  159. Ali, M., Ramirez, P., Mafé, S., Neumann, R. & Ensinger, W. A pH-tunable nanofluidic diode with a broad range of rectifying properties. ACS Nano 3, 603–608 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Smirnov, S. N., Vlassiouk, I. V. & Lavrik, N. V. Voltage-gated hydrophobic nanopores. ACS Nano 5, 7453–7461 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Cantley, L. et al. Voltage gated inter-cation selective ion channels from graphene nanopores. Nanoscale 11, 9856–9861 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Marion, S., Macha, M., Davis, S. J., Chernev, A. & Radenovic, A. Wetting of nanopores probed with pressure. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23, 4975–4987 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Green, Y. Ion transport in nanopores with highly overlapping electric double layers. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 084705 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  164. Mouterde, T. & Bocquet, L. Interfacial transport with mobile surface charges and consequences for ionic transport in carbon nanotubes. Eur. Phys. J. E 41, 148 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. Daiguji, H., Yang, P. & Majumdar, A. Ion transport in nanofluidic channels. Nano Lett. 4, 137–142 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  166. Henderson, P. Zur Thermodynamik der Flüssigkeitsketten. Z. für Physikalische Chem. 59U, 118–127 (1907).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Goldman, D. E. Potential, impedance, and rectification in membranes. J. Gen. Physiol. 27, 37–60 (1943).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. Sten-Knudsen, O. Biological Membranes: Theory of Transport, Potentials and Electric Impulses (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).

  169. Zhan, C. et al. Specific ion effects at graphitic interfaces. Nat. Commun. 10, 4858 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  170. Gonella, G. et al. Water at charged interfaces. Nat. Rev. Chem. 5, 466–485 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Kapil, V. et al. The first-principles phase diagram of monolayer nanoconfined water. Nature 609, 512–516 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  172. Cicero, G., Grossman, J. C., Schwegler, E., Gygi, F. & Galli, G. Water confined in nanotubes and between graphene sheets: a first principle study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 1871–1878 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. Hummer, G., Rasaiah, J. C. & Noworyta, J. P. Water conduction through the hydrophobic channel of a carbon nanotube. Nature 414, 188–190 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  174. Corti, H. R. et al. Structure and dynamics of nanoconfined water and aqueous solutions. Eur. Phys. J. E 44, 136 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Motevaselian, M. H. & Aluru, N. R. Universal reduction in dielectric response of confined fluids. ACS Nano 14, 12761–12770 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. Wang, R. et al. In-plane dielectric constant and conductivity of confined water. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.21538 (2024).

  177. Yang, H. et al. Suppressed terahertz dynamics of water confined in nanometer gaps. Sci. Adv. 10, eadm7315 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  178. Wang, Y. et al. Interfaces govern structure of angstrom-scale confined water. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10354 (2023).

  179. Montenegro, A. et al. Asymmetric response of interfacial water to applied electric fields. Nature 594, 62–65 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  180. Wang, Y. et al. Chemistry governs water organization at a graphene electrode. Nature 615, E1–E2 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  181. Branton, D. et al. The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1146–1153 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Marx, V. Method of the year: long-read sequencing. Nat. Methods 20, 6–11 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  183. Jain, M., Abu-Shumays, R., Olsen, H. E. & Akeson, M. Advances in nanopore direct RNA sequencing. Nat. Methods 19, 1160–1164 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. Restrepo-Pérez, L., Joo, C. & Dekker, C. Paving the way to single-molecule protein sequencing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 786–796 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  185. Varongchayakul, N., Song, J., Meller, A. & Grinstaff, M. W. Single-molecule protein sensing in a nanopore: a tutorial. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 8512–8524 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Nguyen, D. N. et al. Polymer-stabilized Cas9 nanoparticles and modified repair templates increase genome editing efficiency. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 44–49 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  187. Chavis, A. E. et al. Single molecule nanopore spectrometry for peptide detection. ACS Sens. 2, 1319–1328 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Restrepo-Pérez, L. et al. Resolving chemical modifications to a single amino acid within a peptide using a biological nanopore. ACS Nano 13, 13668–13676 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  189. Yusko, E. C. et al. Real-time shape approximation and fingerprinting of single proteins using a nanopore. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 360–367 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  190. Thakur, A. K. & Movileanu, L. Real-time measurement of protein–protein interactions at single-molecule resolution using a biological nanopore. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 96–101 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. Bejerano, T., Etzion, S., Elyagon, S., Etzion, Y. & Cohen, S. Nanoparticle delivery of miRNA-21 mimic to cardiac macrophages improves myocardial remodeling after myocardial infarction. Nano Lett. 18, 5885–5891 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  192. Graf, M., Lihter, M., Altus, D., Marion, S. & Radenovic, A. Transverse detection of DNA using a MoS2 nanopore. Nano Lett. 19, 9075–9083 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  193. Heerema, S. J. & Dekker, C. Graphene nanodevices for DNA sequencing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 127–136 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  194. Feng, J. et al. Identification of single nucleotides in MoS2 nanopores. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 1070–1076 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  195. Yang, W. et al. Translocation of DNA through ultrathin nanoslits. Adv. Mater. 33, 2007682 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. Fried, J. P., Wu, Y., Tilley, R. D. & Gooding, J. J. Optical nanopore sensors for quantitative analysis. Nano Lett. 22, 869–880 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  197. Schmidt, T., Zhang, M., Sychugov, I., Roxhed, N. & Linnros, J. Nanopore arrays in a silicon membrane for parallel single-molecule detection: fabrication. Nanotechnology 26, 314001 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  198. Zhang, M. et al. Nanopore arrays in a silicon membrane for parallel single-molecule detection: DNA translocation. Nanotechnology 26, 314002 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  199. Huh, D. et al. Tuneable elastomeric nanochannels for nanofluidic manipulation. Nat. Mater. 6, 424–428 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  200. Zrehen, A., Ohayon, S., Huttner, D. & Meller, A. On-chip protein separation with single-molecule resolution. Sci. Rep. 10, 15313 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  201. Gao, M., Tsai, P.-C., Su, Y.-S., Peng, P.-H. & Yeh, L.-H. Single mesopores with high surface charges as ultrahigh performance osmotic power generators. Small 16, 2006013 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  202. Ajdari, A. & Bocquet, L. Giant amplification of interfacially driven transport by hydrodynamic slip: diffusio-osmosis and beyond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 186102 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  203. Zhang, H. et al. Bioinspired artificial single ion pump. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 16102–16110 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  204. Xu, Y., Yazbeck, R. & Duan, C. Anomalous mechanosensitive ion transport in nanoparticle-blocked nanopores. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 224702 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  205. Armstrong, C. M. & Hille, B. Voltage-gated ion channels and electrical excitability. Neuron 20, 371–380 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. Pérez-Mitta, G., Albesa, A. G., Trautmann, C., Toimil-Molares, M. E. & Azzaroni, O. Bioinspired integrated nanosystems based on solid-state nanopores: ‘iontronic’ transduction of biological, chemical and physical stimuli. Chem. Sci. 8, 890–913 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  207. Bocquet, L. Concluding remarks: iontronics, from fundamentals to ion-controlled devices — random access memories. Faraday Discuss. 246, 618–622 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  208. Ali, M., Mafe, S., Ramirez, P., Neumann, R. & Ensinger, W. Logic gates using nanofluidic diodes based on conical nanopores functionalized with polyprotic acid chains. Langmuir 25, 11993–11997 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. Liu, W. et al. Bioinspired carbon nanotube-based nanofluidic ionic transistor with ultrahigh switching capabilities for logic circuits. Sci. Adv. 10, eadj7867 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  210. Li, T. et al. A nanofluidic ion regulation membrane with aligned cellulose nanofibers. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau4238 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  211. Cheng, C., Jiang, G., Simon, G. P., Liu, J. Z. & Li, D. Low-voltage electrostatic modulation of ion diffusion through layered graphene-based nanoporous membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 685–690 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  212. Wang, Y. et al. Voltage-gated ion transport in two-dimensional sub-1 nm nanofluidic channels. ACS Nano 13, 11793–11799 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  213. Mei, T. et al. Bio-inspired two-dimensional nanofluidic ionic transistor for neuromorphic signal processing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202401477 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  214. Di Fiori, N. et al. Optoelectronic control of surface charge and translocation dynamics in solid-state nanopores. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 946–951 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  215. Graf, M. et al. Light-enhanced blue energy generation using MoS2 nanopores. Joule 3, 1549–1564 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  216. Xie, B. et al. Perspective on nanofluidic memristors: from mechanism to application. Chem. Asian J. 17, e202200682 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  217. Yu, L. et al. Bioinspired nanofluidic iontronics for brain-like computing. Nano Res. 17, 503–514 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  218. Noy, A. & Darling, S. B. Nanofluidic computing makes a splash. Science 379, 143–144 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  219. Robin, P. & Bocquet, L. Nanofluidics at the crossroads. J. Chem. Phys. 158, 160901 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  220. Sheridan, P., Ma, W. & Lu, W. Pattern recognition with memristor networks. In 2014 IEEE International Symp. Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 1078–1081 (2014).

  221. Li, C. et al. Analogue signal and image processing with large memristor crossbars. Nat. Electron. 1, 52–59 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  222. Wang, D. et al. Transmembrane potential across single conical nanopores and resulting memristive and memcapacitive ion transport. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 3651–3654 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  223. Najem, J. S. et al. Memristive ion channel-doped biomembranes as synaptic mimics. ACS Nano 12, 4702–4711 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  224. Bu, Y., Ahmed, Z. & Yobas, L. A nanofluidic memristor based on ion concentration polarization. Analyst 144, 7168–7172 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  225. Zhang, P. et al. Nanochannel-based transport in an interfacial memristor can emulate the analog weight modulation of synapses. Nano Lett. 19, 4279–4286 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  226. Kumar, M. & Stone, H. A. Membrane science emerging as a convergent scientific field with molecular origins and understanding, and global impact. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2106494118 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  227. Pendse, A. et al. Highly efficient osmotic energy harvesting in charged boron-nitride-nanopore membranes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2009586 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  228. Gao, J. et al. Understanding the giant gap between single-pore- and membrane-based nanofluidic osmotic power generators. Small 15, 1804279 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  229. Di Vincenzo, M. et al. Tunable membranes incorporating artificial water channels for high-performance brackish/low-salinity water reverse osmosis desalination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2022200118 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  230. Wen, Q. et al. Electric-field-induced ionic sieving at planar graphene oxide heterojunctions for miniaturized water desalination. Adv. Mater. 32, 1903954 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  231. Huang, S. et al. Millisecond lattice gasification for high-density CO2- and O2-sieving nanopores in single-layer graphene. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf0116 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  232. Yang, Y. et al. Large-area graphene-nanomesh/carbon-nanotube hybrid membranes for ionic and molecular nanofiltration. Science 364, 1057–1062 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  233. Huang, S. et al. Single-layer graphene membranes by crack-free transfer for gas mixture separation. Nat. Commun. 9, 2632 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  234. Kumar, M., Habel, J. E. O., Shen, Y., Meier, W. P. & Walz, T. High-density reconstitution of functional water channels into vesicular and planar block copolymer membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 18631–18637 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  235. Tu, Y.-M. et al. Rapid fabrication of precise high-throughput filters from membrane protein nanosheets. Nat. Mater. 19, 347–354 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  236. Shen, Y. et al. Achieving high permeability and enhanced selectivity for Angstrom-scale separations using artificial water channel membranes. Nat. Commun. 9, 2294 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  237. Zhang, Z. et al. Vertically transported graphene oxide for high-performance osmotic energy conversion. Adv. Sci. 7, 2000286 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  238. Ghanbari, H. & Esfandiar, A. Ion transport through graphene oxide fibers as promising candidate for blue energy harvesting. Carbon 165, 267–274 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  239. Yang, F. et al. Vertical iontronic energy storage based on osmotic effects and electrode redox reactions. Nat. Energy 9, 263–271 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  240. Wang, L., Wang, Z., Patel, S. K., Lin, S. & Elimelech, M. Nanopore-based power generation from salinity gradient: why it is not viable. ACS Nano 15, 4093–4107 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  241. Loessberg-Zahl, J. et al. Exploring voltage mediated delamination of suspended 2D materials as a cause of commonly observed breakdown. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 430–435 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  242. Macha, M., Thakur, M., Radenovic, A. & Marion, S. Stress induced delamination of suspended MoS2 in aqueous environments. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 19948–19955 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  243. Heerema, S. J. et al. Probing DNA translocations with inplane current signals in a graphene nanoribbon with a nanopore. ACS Nano 12, 2623–2633 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  244. Zhao, Y. et al. Plasmonic bowl-shaped nanopore for Raman detection of single DNA molecules in flow-through. Nano Lett. 23, 4830–4836 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  245. Chou, I.-H. et al. Nanofluidic biosensing for β-amyloid detection using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 8, 1729–1735 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  246. Wu, Z. F. et al. Proton and molecular permeation through the basal plane of monolayer graphene oxide. Nat. Commun. 14, 7756 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  247. Prakash, M. & Gershenfeld, N. Microfluidic bubble logic. Science 315, 832–835 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  248. Zhou, X. et al. Nanofluidic memristor by elastic deformation of nanopores with nanoparticles adsorption. Natl Sci. Rev. 11, nwad216 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  249. McCutcheon, J. R. & Mauter, M. S. Fixing the desalination membrane pipeline. Science 380, 242–244 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  250. Wang, L. et al. Water transport in reverse osmosis membranes is governed by pore flow, not a solution-diffusion mechanism. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf8488 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  251. Villalobos, L. F., Babu, D. J., Hsu, K.-J., Van Goethem, C. & Agrawal, K. V. Gas separation membranes with atom-thick nanopores: the potential of nanoporous single-layer graphene. Acc. Mater. Res. 3, 1073–1087 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  252. Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Bollas, A., Wang, Y. & Au, K. F. Nanopore sequencing technology, bioinformatics and applications. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1348–1365 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  253. Manrao, E. A. et al. Reading DNA at single-nucleotide resolution with a mutant MspA nanopore and phi29 DNA polymerase. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 349–353 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Introduction (T.E., N.R., K.V.A., S.G., M.K., A.N. and A.R.); Experimentation (T.E., N.R., K.V.A., S.G., M.K., A.N. and A.R.); Results (T.E., N.R., K.V.A., S.G., M.K., A.N. and A.R.); Applications (T.E., N.R., K.V.A., S.G., M.K., A.N. and A.R.); Reproducibility and data deposition (T.E., N.R., K.V.A., S.G., M.K., A.N. and A.R.); Limitations and optimizations (T.E., N.R., K.V.A., S.G., M.K., A.N. and A.R.); Outlook (T.E., N.R., K.V.A., S.G., M.K., A.N. and A.R.); Overview of the Primer (all authors).

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kumar Varoon Agrawal, Slaven Garaj, Manish Kumar, Aleksandr Noy or Aleksandra Radenovic.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Methods Primers thanks Nikita Kavokine and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Aquaporin-based biomimetic membranes: http://www.aquatechtrade.com/news/water-treatment/aquaporin-turns-to-pou-and-public-listing

DNA sequencing: https://nanoporetech.com/about-us/news/oxford-nanopore-announces-breakthrough-performance-simplex-single-molecule-accuracy

Ion channel library: https://www.ionchannellibrary.com/ion-channel-software/

pyABF: https://pypi.org/project/pyabf/

Glossary

Ångström-scale pores

Pores with dimensions on the order of ångström (10−10 m) achieved through atomically precise fabrication methods.

Confinement

Restriction of fluid motion and behaviour within small-scale channels or pores, leading to unique phenomena and effects owing to the proximity of surfaces.

Electro-osmotic flow

Liquid motion driven by an applied electric field, occurring at charged solid–liquid walls.

Landau–Squire jet

A submerged jet coming from a point source into an infinite volume of fluid of the same kind.

Osmotic flow

Liquid motion driven by a solute concentration gradient.

Osmotic ion current

Ion current driven by a concentration gradient.

Reactive ion etching

A process used to pattern surfaces at the nanoscale by bombarding them with energetic ions in a reactive gas environment, commonly used in nanofluidic device fabrication to create precise structures.

Slip length

Imaginary extent of the liquid flow velocity profile extrapolation within the solid wall. A positive slip length means that the liquid velocity at the wall surface is non-zero.

Streaming ion current

Ion current driven by a pressure gradient, which drives counter-ions in the Debye layer.

van der Waals assembly

Stacking of 2D materials by deterministic or stochastic transfer processes. The resulting multilayer heterostructures are held together by van der Waals interactions.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Emmerich, T., Ronceray, N., Agrawal, K.V. et al. Nanofluidics. Nat Rev Methods Primers 4, 69 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-024-00344-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-024-00344-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing