Global effective-field-theory analysis of new-physics effects in (semi)leptonic kaon decays

1. FlaviaNet Working Group on Kaon Decays collaboration, M. Antonelli et al., Precision tests of the standard model with leptonic and semileptonic kaon decays, arXiv:0801.1817 [INSPIRE].

2. FlaviaNet Working Group on Kaon Decays collaboration, M. Antonelli et al., An evaluation of |V _us | and precise tests of the Standard Model from world data on leptonic and semileptonic kaon decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 69 (2010) 399 [arXiv:1005.2323] [INSPIRE].

3. V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, H. Neufeld, A. Pich and J. Portoles, Kaon decays in the standard model, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 399 [arXiv:1107.6001] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

4. Particle Data Group collaboration, K.A. Olive et al., Review of particle physics, Chin. Phys. C 38 (2014) 090001 [INSPIRE].

5. S. Aoki et al., Review of lattice results concerning low-energy particle physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2890 [arXiv:1310.8555] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

6. J.L. Rosner, S. Stone and R.S. Van de Water, Leptonic Decays of Charged Pseudoscalar Mesons — 2015, submitted to Particle Data Book (2015), arXiv:1509.02220 [INSPIRE].

7. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral perturbation theory: expansions in the mass of the strange quark, Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 465 [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

8. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Low-energy expansion of meson form-factors, Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 517 [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

9. V. Cirigliano, M. Knecht, H. Neufeld, H. Rupertsberger and P. Talavera, Radiative corrections to K(l3) decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 23 (2002) 121 [hep-ph/0110153] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

10. J. Bijnens and P. Talavera, K(l3) decays in chiral perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B 669 (2003) 341 [hep-ph/0303103] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

11. M. Jamin, J.A. Oller and A. Pich, Strangeness changing scalar form-factors, Nucl. Phys. B 622 (2002) 279 [hep-ph/0110193] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

12. B. Ananthanarayan and B. Moussallam, Four-point correlator constraints on electromagnetic chiral parameters and resonance effective Lagrangians, JHEP 06 (2004) 047 [hep-ph/0405206] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

13. M. Jamin, J.A. Oller and A. Pich, Order p ⁶ chiral couplings from the scalar Kπ form-factor, JHEP 02 (2004) 047 [hep-ph/0401080] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

14. V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, M. Eidemuller, R. Kaiser, A. Pich and J. Portoles, The < SPP > Green function and SU(3) breaking in K(l3) decays, JHEP 04 (2005) 006 [hep-ph/0503108] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

15. S. Descotes-Genon and B. Moussallam, Radiative corrections in weak semi-leptonic processes at low energy: a two-step matching determination, Eur. Phys. J. C 42 (2005) 403 [hep-ph/0505077] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

16. V. Cirigliano and I. Rosell, Two-loop effective theory analysis of \( \pi (K)\to e{\overline{\nu}}_e\gamma \) branching ratios, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 231801 [arXiv:0707.3439] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

17. V. Cirigliano and I. Rosell, \( \pi /K-\to e{\overline{nu}}_e \) branching ratios to O(e ² p ⁴) in chiral perturbation theory, JHEP 10 (2007) 005 [arXiv:0707.4464] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

18. A. Kastner and H. Neufeld, The K(l3) scalar form factors in the standard model, Eur. Phys. J. C 57 (2008) 541 [arXiv:0805.2222] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

19. V. Cirigliano, M. Giannotti and H. Neufeld, Electromagnetic effects in K(l3) decays, JHEP 11 (2008) 006 [arXiv:0807.4507] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

20. V. Bernard, M. Oertel, E. Passemar and J. Stern, Dispersive representation and shape of the K(l3) form factors: robustness, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 034034 [arXiv:0903.1654] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

21. V. Cirigliano and H. Neufeld, A note on isospin violation in Pl2(γ) decays, Phys. Lett. B 700 (2011) 7 [arXiv:1102.0563] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

22. BaBar collaboration, J.P. Lees et al., Evidence for an excess of \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}{\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 101802 [arXiv:1205.5442] [INSPIRE].

23. BaBar collaboration, J.P. Lees et al., Measurement of an excess of \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}{\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) decays and implications for charged Higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 072012 [arXiv:1303.0571] [INSPIRE].

24. LHCb collaboration, Test of lepton universality using B ⁺ → K ⁺ ℓ ⁺ ℓ ⁻ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 151601 [arXiv:1406.6482] [INSPIRE].

25. LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions \( \mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({\overline{B}}^0\to {D}^{\ast +}{\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau}\right)/\mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({\overline{B}}^0\to {D}^{\ast +}{\mu}^{-}{\overline{v}}_{\mu}\right) \), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 111803 [arXiv:1506.08614] [INSPIRE].

26. Belle collaboration, M. Huschle et al., Measurement of the branching ratio of \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}{\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) relative to \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}{\ell}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\ell } \) decays with hadronic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 072014 [arXiv:1507.03233] [INSPIRE].

27. LHCb collaboration, Angular analysis of the B ⁰ → K ^*0 μ ⁺ μ ⁻ decay using 3 fb ⁻¹ of integrated luminosity, JHEP 02 (2016) 104 [arXiv:1512.04442] [INSPIRE].

28. Belle collaboration, A. Abdesselam et al., Measurement of the branching ratio of \( {\overline{B}}^0\to {D}^{\ast +}{\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) relative to \( {\overline{B}}^0\to {D}^{\ast +}{\ell}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\ell } \) decays with a semileptonic tagging method, arXiv:1603.06711 [INSPIRE].

29. Belle collaboration, A. Abdesselam et al., Angular analysis of B ⁰ → K ^*(892)⁰ ℓ ⁺ ℓ ⁻, arXiv:1604.04042 [INSPIRE].

30. A.J. Buras, M. Gorbahn, S. Jäger and M. Jamin, Improved anatomy of ϵ′/ϵ in the standard model, JHEP 11 (2015) 202 [arXiv:1507.06345] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

31. A. Masiero, P. Paradisi and R. Petronzio, Probing new physics through μ-e universality in K → lν, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 011701 [hep-ph/0511289] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

32. V. Bernard, M. Oertel, E. Passemar and J. Stern, K(μ3)^L decay: a stringent test of right-handed quark currents, Phys. Lett. B 638 (2006) 480 [hep-ph/0603202] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

33. V. Bernard, M. Oertel, E. Passemar and J. Stern, Tests of non-standard electroweak couplings of right-handed quarks, JHEP 01 (2008) 015 [arXiv:0707.4194] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

34. B.A. Campbell and A. Ismail, Leptonic pion decay and physics beyond the electroweak standard model, arXiv:0810.4918 [INSPIRE].

35. M. Carpentier and S. Davidson, Constraints on two-lepton, two quark operators, Eur. Phys. J. C 70 (2010) 1071 [arXiv:1008.0280] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

36. M. Jung, A. Pich and P. Tuzon, Charged-Higgs phenomenology in the aligned two-Higgs-doublet model, JHEP 11 (2010) 003 [arXiv:1006.0470] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

37. S. Bauman, J. Erler and M. Ramsey-Musolf, Charged current universality and the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 035012 [arXiv:1204.0035] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

38. V. Cirigliano, J. Jenkins and M. Gonzalez-Alonso, Semileptonic decays of light quarks beyond the Standard Model, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 95 [arXiv:0908.1754] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

39. N. Severijns, M. Beck and O. Naviliat-Cuncic, Tests of the standard electroweak model in β decay, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 (2006) 991 [nucl-ex/0605029] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

40. F. Wauters, A. García and R. Hong, Limits on tensor-type weak currents from nuclear and neutron β decays, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 025501 [arXiv:1306.2608] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

41. R.W. Pattie, K.P. Hickerson and A.R. Young, Limits on tensor coupling from neutron β-decay, Phys. Rev. C 88 (2013) 048501 [arXiv:1309.2499] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

42. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

43. M. Moulson, Experimental determination of V _us from kaon decays, talk given at 8^th International Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle (CKM2014), September 8–12, Vienna, Austria (2014), arXiv:1411.5252 [INSPIRE].

44. R. Alonso, B. Grinstein and J. Martin Camalich, SU(2) × U(1) gauge invariance and the shape of new physics in rare B decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 241802 [arXiv:1407.7044] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

45. J. Aebischer, A. Crivellin, M. Fael and C. Greub, Matching of gauge invariant dimension-six operators for b → s and b → c transitions, JHEP 05 (2016) 037 [arXiv:1512.02830] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

46. R. Alonso, B. Grinstein and J. Martin Camalich, Lepton universality violation and lepton flavor conservation in B-meson decays, JHEP 10 (2015) 184 [arXiv:1505.05164] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

47. T. Bhattacharya et al., Probing novel scalar and tensor interactions from (ultra)cold neutrons to the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 054512 [arXiv:1110.6448] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

48. A. Sirlin, Large m(W), m(Z) behavior of the O(α) corrections to semileptonic processes mediated by W , Nucl. Phys. B 196 (1982) 83 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

49. W.J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Radiative corrections to π(l2) decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3629 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

50. M.B. Voloshin, Upper bound on tensor interaction in the decay \( {\pi}^{-}\to {e}^{-}\overline{\nu}\gamma \), Phys. Lett. B 283 (1992) 120 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

51. P. Herczeg, On the question of a tensor interaction in π → e electron-neutrino γ decay, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 247 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

52. B.A. Campbell and D.W. Maybury, Constraints on scalar couplings from π ^± → l ^± ν(l), Nucl. Phys. B 709 (2005) 419 [hep-ph/0303046] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

53. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators III: gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology, JHEP 04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

54. M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo, G. Isidori and D. Marzocca, Pseudo-observables in Higgs decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 128 [arXiv:1412.6038] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

55. M. Finkemeier, Radiative corrections to π(l2) and K(l2) decays, Phys. Lett. B 387 (1996) 391 [hep-ph/9505434] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

56. V.N. Bolotov et al., The experimental study of the \( {\pi}^{-}\to {e}^{-}\overline{\nu}\gamma \) decay in flight, Phys. Lett. B 243 (1990) 308 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

57. M. Bychkov et al., New precise measurement of the pion weak form factors in π ⁺ → e ⁺ νγ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 051802 [arXiv:0804.1815] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

58. KLOE collaboration, F. Ambrosino et al., Precise measurement of Γ(K → eν(γ))/Γ(K → μν(γ)) and study of K → eνγ, Eur. Phys. J. C 64 (2009) 627 [Erratum ibid. 65 (2010) 703] [arXiv:0907.3594] [INSPIRE].

59. J. Bijnens, G. Ecker and J. Gasser, Radiative semileptonic kaon decays, Nucl. Phys. B 396 (1993) 81 [hep-ph/9209261] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

60. A.A. Poblaguev, On the π → e neutrino γ decay sensitivity to a tensor coupling in the effective quark lepton interaction, Phys. Lett. B 238 (1990) 108 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

61. M.V. Chizhov, Search for tensor interactions in kaon decays at DAPHNE, Phys. Lett. B 381 (1996) 359 [hep-ph/9511287] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

62. V. Mateu and J. Portoles, Form-factors in radiative pion decay, Eur. Phys. J. C 52 (2007) 325 [arXiv:0706.1039] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

63. O.P. Yushchenko et al., High statistic study of the K ⁻ → π ⁰ μ ⁻ ν decay, Phys. Lett. B 581 (2004) 31 [hep-ex/0312004] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

64. O.P. Yushchenko et al., High statistic measurement of the K ⁻ → π ⁰ e ⁻ ν decay form-factors, Phys. Lett. B 589 (2004) 111 [hep-ex/0404030] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

65. NA48 collaboration, A. Lai et al., Measurement of K ⁰(e3) form-factors, Phys. Lett. B 604 (2004) 1 [hep-ex/0410065] [INSPIRE].

66. KTeV collaboration, T. Alexopoulos et al., Measurements of semileptonic K(L) decay form-factors, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 092007 [hep-ex/0406003] [INSPIRE].

67. KLOE collaboration, F. Ambrosino et al., Measurement of the form-factor slopes for the decay K(L) → π ^± e ^∓ ν with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 636 (2006) 166 [hep-ex/0601038] [INSPIRE].

68. KLOE collaboration, F. Ambrosino et al., Measurement of the K(L) → πμν form-factor parameters with the KLOE detector, JHEP 12 (2007) 105 [arXiv:0710.4470] [INSPIRE].

69. NA48 collaboration, A. Lai et al., Measurement of K ⁰(μ3) form factors, Phys. Lett. B 647 (2007) 341 [hep-ex/0703002] [INSPIRE].

70. KTeV collaboration, E. Abouzaid et al., Dispersive analysis of K(lμ3) and K(le3) scalar and vector form factors using KTeV data, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 052001 [arXiv:0912.1291] [INSPIRE].

71. C.G. Callan and S.B. Treiman, Equal time commutators and K meson decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16 (1966) 153 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

72. J. Bijnens and K. Ghorbani, Isospin breaking in Kπ vector form-factors for the weak and rare decays K(l3), \( K\to \pi \nu \overline{\nu} \) and K → πℓ ⁺ ℓ ⁻, arXiv:0711.0148 [INSPIRE].

73. N. Carrasco, P. Lami, V. Lubicz, L. Riggio, S. Simula and C. Tarantino, K → π semileptonic form factors with N _f = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 114512 [arXiv:1602.04113] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

74. J.C. Hardy and I.S. Towner, Superallowed 0⁺ → 0⁺ nuclear β decays: 2014 critical survey, with precise results for V _ud and CKM unitarity, Phys. Rev. C 91 (2015) 025501 [arXiv:1411.5987] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

75. S. Weinberg, Charge symmetry of weak interactions, Phys. Rev. 112 (1958) 1375 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

76. H.-M. Chang, M. González-Alonso and J. Martin Camalich, Nonstandard semileptonic hyperon decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 161802 [arXiv:1412.8484] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

77. N. Cabibbo, E.C. Swallow and R. Winston, Semileptonic hyperon decays and CKM unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 251803 [hep-ph/0307214] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

78. V. Mateu and A. Pich, V(us) determination from hyperon semileptonic decays, JHEP 10 (2005) 041 [hep-ph/0509045] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

79. S. Sasaki, Hyperon vector form factor from 2 + 1 flavor lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 114502 [arXiv:1209.6115] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

80. L.-S. Geng, K.-W. Li and J. Martin Camalich, Chiral extrapolation and finite-volume dependence of the hyperon vector couplings, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 113007 [arXiv:1402.7133] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

81. P.E. Shanahan et al., SU(3) breaking in hyperon transition vector form factors, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 074029 [arXiv:1508.06923] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

82. D. Mund et al., Determination of the weak axial vector coupling from a measurement of the β-asymmetry parameter a in neutron β decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 172502 [arXiv:1204.0013] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

83. UCNA collaboration, M.P. Mendenhall et al., Precision measurement of the neutron β-decay asymmetry, Phys. Rev. C 87 (2013) 032501 [arXiv:1210.7048] [INSPIRE].

84. J. Green, Hadron structure from lattice QCD, AIP Conf. Proc. 1701 (2016) 040007 [arXiv:1412.4637] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

85. R. Horsley et al., Nucleon axial charge and pion decay constant from two-flavor lattice QCD, Phys. Lett. B 732 (2014) 41 [arXiv:1302.2233] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

86. G.S. Bali et al., Nucleon isovector couplings from N _f = 2 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 054501 [arXiv:1412.7336] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

87. A. Abdel-Rehim et al., Nucleon and pion structure with lattice QCD simulations at physical value of the pion mass, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 114513 [arXiv:1507.04936] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

88. N. Cabibbo, E.C. Swallow and R. Winston, Semileptonic hyperon decays, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 53 (2003) 39 [hep-ph/0307298] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

89. M. González-Alonso and J. Martin Camalich, Isospin breaking in the nucleon mass and the sensitivity of β decays to new physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 042501 [arXiv:1309.4434] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

90. O. Naviliat-Cuncic and M. González-Alonso, Prospects for precision measurements in nuclear β decay at the LHC era, Annalen Phys. 525 (2013) 600 [arXiv:1304.1759] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

91. W.J. Marciano, Precise determination of |V _us | from lattice calculations of pseudoscalar decay constants, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 231803 [hep-ph/0402299] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

92. A. Abada, D. Das, A.M. Teixeira, A. Vicente and C. Weiland, Tree-level lepton universality violation in the presence of sterile neutrinos: impact for R _K and R _π , JHEP 02 (2013) 048 [arXiv:1211.3052] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

93. A. de Gouvêa and A. Kobach, Global constraints on a heavy neutrino, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 033005 [arXiv:1511.00683] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

94. PiENu collaboration, A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Improved measurement of the π → eν branching ratio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 071801 [arXiv:1506.05845] [INSPIRE].

95. M. Moulson, private communication.

96. I. Baum, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, L. Orifici and S. Simula, Matrix elements of the electromagnetic operator between kaon and pion states, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 074503 [arXiv:1108.1021] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

97. J. Hardy and I. Towner, private communication.

98. MILC collaboration, A. Bazavov et al., Nonperturbative QCD simulations with 2 + 1 flavors of improved staggered quarks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 1349 [arXiv:0903.3598] [INSPIRE].

99. HPQCD, UKQCD collaboration, E. Follana, C.T.H. Davies, G.P. Lepage and J. Shigemitsu, High precision determination of the π, K, D and D(s) decay constants from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 062002 [arXiv:0706.1726] [INSPIRE].

100. S. Dürr et al., The ratio FK/Fpi in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 054507 [arXiv:1001.4692] [INSPIRE].

     ADS  Google Scholar 

101. RBC, UKQCD collaboration, R. Arthur et al., Domain wall QCD with near-physical pions, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 094514 [arXiv:1208.4412] [INSPIRE].

102. A. Bazavov et al., Kaon semileptonic vector form factor and determination of |V _us | using staggered fermions, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 073012 [arXiv:1212.4993] [INSPIRE].

     ADS  Google Scholar 

103. P.A. Boyle et al., The kaon semileptonic form factor with near physical domain wall quarks, JHEP 08 (2013) 132 [arXiv:1305.7217] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

104. H.-W. Lin and K. Orginos, First calculation of hyperon axial couplings from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 034507 [arXiv:0712.1214] [INSPIRE].

     ADS  Google Scholar 

105. QCDSF/UKQCD collaboration, M. Gockeler et al., Baryon axial charges and momentum fractions with N _f = 2 + 1 dynamical fermions, PoS(LATTICE 2010)163 [arXiv:1102.3407] [INSPIRE].

106. A.N. Cooke et al., SU(3) flavour breaking and baryon structure, PoS(LATTICE 2013)278 [arXiv:1311.4916] [INSPIRE].

107. T. Ledwig, J. Martin Camalich, L.S. Geng and M.J. Vicente Vacas, Octet-baryon axial-vector charges and SU(3)-breaking effects in the semileptonic hyperon decays, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 054502 [arXiv:1405.5456] [INSPIRE].

     ADS  Google Scholar 

108. R.S. Chivukula and H. Georgi, Composite technicolor standard model, Phys. Lett. B 188 (1987) 99 [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

109. L.J. Hall and L. Randall, Weak scale effective supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 2939 [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

110. A.J. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager and L. Silvestrini, Universal unitarity triangle and physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 500 (2001) 161 [hep-ph/0007085] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

111. G. D’Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: an effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

112. V. Cirigliano, B. Grinstein, G. Isidori and M.B. Wise, Minimal flavor violation in the lepton sector, Nucl. Phys. B 728 (2005) 121 [hep-ph/0507001] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

113. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

114. A. Efrati, A. Falkowski and Y. Soreq, Electroweak constraints on flavorful effective theories, JHEP 07 (2015) 018 [arXiv:1503.07872] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

115. A. Falkowski and K. Mimouni, Model independent constraints on four-lepton operators, JHEP 02 (2016) 086 [arXiv:1511.07434] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

116. V. Cirigliano, M. Gonzalez-Alonso and M.L. Graesser, Non-standard charged current interactions: β decays versus the LHC, JHEP 02 (2013) 046 [arXiv:1210.4553] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

117. J. de Blas, M. Chala and J. Santiago, Global constraints on lepton-quark contact interactions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 095011 [arXiv:1307.5068] [INSPIRE].

     ADS  Google Scholar 

118. Z. Han and W. Skiba, Effective theory analysis of precision electroweak data, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 075009 [hep-ph/0412166] [INSPIRE].

     ADS  Google Scholar 

119. L. Berthier and M. Trott, Consistent constraints on the standard model effective field theory, JHEP 02 (2016) 069 [arXiv:1508.05060] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

120. I. Brivio, J. Gonzalez-Fraile, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and L. Merlo, The complete HEFT Lagrangian after the LHC Run I, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 416 [arXiv:1604.06801] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

121. R. Contino, A. Falkowski, F. Goertz, C. Grojean and F. Riva, On the validity of the effective field theory approach to SM precision tests, JHEP 07 (2016) 144 [arXiv:1604.06444] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

122. CMS collaboration, Search for physics beyond the standard model in final states with a lepton and missing transverse energy in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 092005 [arXiv:1408.2745] [INSPIRE].

123. A.D. Martin, W.J. Stirling, R.S. Thorne and G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 63 (2009) 189 [arXiv:0901.0002] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references