[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app

marktorch-84684

Joined Sep 2018
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see ratings breakdowns and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.

Badges2

To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Explore badges

Reviews1

marktorch-84684's rating
How We Got Here

How We Got Here

8.3
  • Sep 26, 2018
  • Ridiculous view of history

    I just watched an episode of this series that seemed to claim that William Randolph Hurst was in some way responsible for the existence of investigative journalism. Never mind that earlier in the episode, it was pointed out that he only got into the newspaper business because his father won the San Francisco Examiner in a game of cards and kept it because he wanted to get elected. It also mentions, as if in passing, that W R Hurst's papers routinely invented sensational stories, faked interviews, staged pictures and generally engaged in rabble rousing in order to further his own interests. The evidence offered suggested that he has a claim to be the father of manipulative mass media rather than sharing the DNA of Bob Woodward. It was almost like the "Corporate America" on coke view of the history in it's ludicrous mix of jingoism and incoherence. Maybe the series itself is the spawn of just the kind of "yellow journalism" this episode explains and then glosses over. I hope no one thinks this review contains spoilers. That would credit this show with a level of cogency to which it doesn't even appear to aspire.

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.