raulvg-31151
Joined Oct 2017
Welcome to the new profile
We're making some updates, and some features will be temporarily unavailable while we enhance your experience. The previous version will not be accessible after 7/14. Stay tuned for the upcoming relaunch.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews24
raulvg-31151's rating
Seriously, someone needs to stop David Gordon Green, even though I give him a 5, he needs to stop... (and I don't agree with the horrible ratings for this film).
Yes, he is boring. Yes, he is extremely forgettable. Yes, he doesn't have good performances... but he is a film in The Exorcist franchise, whether we like it or not.
Not agreeing is different from "not understanding" the horrible reviews that are barely more than 1. Yes, if I were a big fan of the first film, I would be extremely angry, because... this is just another mediocre horror film compared to original masterpiece. William Friedkin must be turning in his grave right now. (RIP, bless you for not having to see that!)
The script is still bad and cliche, even though it contains interesting ideas. Here the film's focus is only on mediocrity... the mediocrity of generic films. That thing that makes viewers like you and me have the horrible feeling of indifference.
I think my only compliment will be on the practical makeup, which is done in most of the scenes, where all of this is present. (As for the downside of this compliment, it's that there are few moments with CGI... even though it's little, it's rubbish. It's clearly poorly done, it looks like Playstation 3 graphics XD)
In short: if you're a big fan of The Exorcist, see it in the cinema... (Even though I already know that as an acid fan, you'll hate it... I still believe it's worth it).
Other than that, it's better not to watch it and pretend that this film never existed (Not because it's horrible, in fact, because it's INDIFFERENT). Or watch it when you have nothing to do, there's a movie that will become a classic to watch while you take a nap.
THE BIGGEST MISTAKE HERE IS BRINGING CHRIS MACNEIL BACK!!
Yes, he is boring. Yes, he is extremely forgettable. Yes, he doesn't have good performances... but he is a film in The Exorcist franchise, whether we like it or not.
Not agreeing is different from "not understanding" the horrible reviews that are barely more than 1. Yes, if I were a big fan of the first film, I would be extremely angry, because... this is just another mediocre horror film compared to original masterpiece. William Friedkin must be turning in his grave right now. (RIP, bless you for not having to see that!)
The script is still bad and cliche, even though it contains interesting ideas. Here the film's focus is only on mediocrity... the mediocrity of generic films. That thing that makes viewers like you and me have the horrible feeling of indifference.
I think my only compliment will be on the practical makeup, which is done in most of the scenes, where all of this is present. (As for the downside of this compliment, it's that there are few moments with CGI... even though it's little, it's rubbish. It's clearly poorly done, it looks like Playstation 3 graphics XD)
In short: if you're a big fan of The Exorcist, see it in the cinema... (Even though I already know that as an acid fan, you'll hate it... I still believe it's worth it).
Other than that, it's better not to watch it and pretend that this film never existed (Not because it's horrible, in fact, because it's INDIFFERENT). Or watch it when you have nothing to do, there's a movie that will become a classic to watch while you take a nap.
THE BIGGEST MISTAKE HERE IS BRINGING CHRIS MACNEIL BACK!!
The film addresses a well-commented and discussed topic: the learning of AI machines.
Star Wars clearly influenced this film and, honestly, the production doesn't disguise this at all. Mainly with the choice of director (Rogue One), which makes the viewer notice this and think about the similarity of the works... The Last Of Us also seems to have influenced the project, thanks to the father x daughter relationship that seems very Joel and Ellie.
The film has an interesting and eye-catching story, which appeals and manages to catch my attention with its narrative. Unfortunately, its ending is predictable and a big cliché is present throughout its conclusion.
The director seems to choose to focus more on the art direction than on any other aspect, as the world of this film is so "alive" that I can even compare it to James Cameron's vision in Avatar.
As for acting?
I was indifferent, because at times the actors are both good and bad, they never stand out... but for me, the one who deserves the spotlight here is a secondary character, Drew, who is played by Sturgill Simpson. Still, the protagonists don't bother me.
My main criticism, apart from the clichés and poor plot, is that the film's budget could have been used much better. This way they would be spent on different aspects that were overlooked compared to others, making a more immersive and, consequently, more fun film.
It's an exciting story with good moments of comedy, one of the classics and great for the family. I would say the ticket is worth it, but my real opinion? It's a film that you can safely pass by without watching, despite presenting some really cool ideas... it's not really what it "promises" to be in the plot.
Star Wars clearly influenced this film and, honestly, the production doesn't disguise this at all. Mainly with the choice of director (Rogue One), which makes the viewer notice this and think about the similarity of the works... The Last Of Us also seems to have influenced the project, thanks to the father x daughter relationship that seems very Joel and Ellie.
The film has an interesting and eye-catching story, which appeals and manages to catch my attention with its narrative. Unfortunately, its ending is predictable and a big cliché is present throughout its conclusion.
The director seems to choose to focus more on the art direction than on any other aspect, as the world of this film is so "alive" that I can even compare it to James Cameron's vision in Avatar.
As for acting?
I was indifferent, because at times the actors are both good and bad, they never stand out... but for me, the one who deserves the spotlight here is a secondary character, Drew, who is played by Sturgill Simpson. Still, the protagonists don't bother me.
My main criticism, apart from the clichés and poor plot, is that the film's budget could have been used much better. This way they would be spent on different aspects that were overlooked compared to others, making a more immersive and, consequently, more fun film.
It's an exciting story with good moments of comedy, one of the classics and great for the family. I would say the ticket is worth it, but my real opinion? It's a film that you can safely pass by without watching, despite presenting some really cool ideas... it's not really what it "promises" to be in the plot.
The film begins to move forward little by little, building the strongest and most disturbing events slowly, giving the viewer the right time to assimilate and reflect on all the controversial issues present in the film.
Its narrative clearly romanticizes the real story, in the classic fictional Hollywood style (but still, it's a positive point, as the more this style = the more public).
The cast, especially Jim Caviezel and Bill Camp, surprise the entire film, completely stealing the show, always, with each appearance on screen!
The film is extremely realistic and heavy, with a heavy dialogue, which makes everything more serious and emotional, especially when it comes from the character of Bill Camp, as he is simply sensational with his lines!
I love the fact that the film is more focused on the shock and reflection aspect, rather than on the action... here the action is still present, but it is completely ignored. Only appearing briefly (but epically) at its beginning and end.
Reflection is what controls this film. With each act, several questions arise in the minds of those who watch and the shocks that move us, make everyone more apprehensive with each heavier and scarier/disgusting scene involving children, as well as human trafficking in general.
This is not a message to be ignored, so I say, the criticism is wrong this time! The film is wonderful and should be watched in the cinema, as it is more than worth it!
(Again, we have very heavy scenes here, I don't agree with the age rating, but yes, it should at least be one of 16 or even 18. Be careful with children and teenagers or people with weak minds/stomachs when watching !)
Its narrative clearly romanticizes the real story, in the classic fictional Hollywood style (but still, it's a positive point, as the more this style = the more public).
The cast, especially Jim Caviezel and Bill Camp, surprise the entire film, completely stealing the show, always, with each appearance on screen!
The film is extremely realistic and heavy, with a heavy dialogue, which makes everything more serious and emotional, especially when it comes from the character of Bill Camp, as he is simply sensational with his lines!
I love the fact that the film is more focused on the shock and reflection aspect, rather than on the action... here the action is still present, but it is completely ignored. Only appearing briefly (but epically) at its beginning and end.
Reflection is what controls this film. With each act, several questions arise in the minds of those who watch and the shocks that move us, make everyone more apprehensive with each heavier and scarier/disgusting scene involving children, as well as human trafficking in general.
This is not a message to be ignored, so I say, the criticism is wrong this time! The film is wonderful and should be watched in the cinema, as it is more than worth it!
(Again, we have very heavy scenes here, I don't agree with the age rating, but yes, it should at least be one of 16 or even 18. Be careful with children and teenagers or people with weak minds/stomachs when watching !)