olegka-21456

Immediately, probably, it should be stipulated that I'm not a fan of superhero films, I'm not a fan of comics, and even from cartoons, I'd rather have chosen "Tom and Jerry" than a cartoon about Batman. But despite all the first two films of the trilogy described above, I liked them very much. The reason for this is probably the cool, noir atmosphere of Gotem created by the directors, the fine acting and, of course, the good script stories. Well, after such a long introduction, it is logical to ask the question, what about the third part? Nothing! Absolutely nothing! In the final part of the trilogy there is absolutely nothing that I liked in the first two previous parts of the trilogy. The weakest part of the film is probably the script, and this fact is very surprising, as Christopher in all his works spent a lot of time developing the script (which is only the scenario of "Memento"). Think about the reasons why the script in this picture is so weak you can endlessly. It is worth saying that most of the film is trying to build an exhibition, to reveal the main actors, but the author does not get it in the end, half the time is incredibly boring watching. So the script is so drawn and adjusted for the denouement that it's simply impossible not to notice it, it simply contradicts all laws of logic and healthy meaning. The performances of some scenes are very depressing, many battle scenes also give up cretinism, and it is not clear how they can be looked at. Yes, in the end, Christopher prepared his own story twist, but even he did not work and was predictable and boring. And as for the final scenes, I'm sorry, I could not stand it, how much forgiveness do I have to spit on all the laws of physics, science and just common sense, what would come up with this ?! Well, in general, with the plot all. The second question that arose after watching where the atmosphere of Gotham City had gone? Yes, she just took and evaporated not that noir style for which I loved the first two films of the trilogy, now Gotham is an ordinary boring metropolis, which is simply not interesting to watch. Why was this done or why? There are no answers, alas, it's sad. Well, the last point is an actor's game. Yes, I did not expect something outstanding. In principle, there was nothing outstanding on the screen, all that was that good actors gave out a good game and in sum with the above described it looked again extremely boring and not interesting. It's time to sum up and draw some conclusions. This picture is the weakest in the filmography of a good director Christopher Nolan. As it is not surprising, but basically the script was let down, of course, as a result of which the whole film is simply impossible to watch, the atmosphere and appeal were lost as in the two previous parts of the trilogy. Who can recommend this film, well, probably only to fans of superhero cinema and comic book fans. To all other lovers of good cinema, this film is by no means worth watching. I have everything.

This picture is the next adaptation of the book "Duhles of the 21st century. Selfi "for the authorship of Sergei Minaev. This film attracted me very much from the very beginning, firstly, not a bad idea: "Is it really that a worthy psychological thriller about split personality has been shot in Russia?" Secondly, it is participation in this project of one of the best Russian actors of our time and one of my favorite actors, Konstantin Khabensky. What did we get as a result? Even considering this work, being very optimistic, we still have to state the fact that it turned out to be quite unprepossessing and not interesting. The weakest in the film is, of course, the scenario there are many illogical places, inconsistencies, many subject lines and scenes do not affect the development of the main story story in any way. The entire production looks a bit fake, and you do not believe in what's happening on the screen. Oh, and what was the potential! It is very sad that the final result turned out to be very unfortunate, although in the beginning the film managed to attract the viewer, but closer to the middle it all became boring and simply uninteresting. One of the few pluses is the work of the operator Vladislav Opelyants. In his work creates a gray absorbing melancholic atmosphere of everything happening diluted with a pleasant neon, the operator managed to convey that oppressive atmosphere of the megacity and even in some ways create a noir style of the big city, but all this again comes to naught when suddenly the picture appears product placement of vodka. Also from the pros it's as always a very good game of Konstantin Khabensky who even in such a film is incredibly trying and gives out the game no worse than in the "geographer" or "collector". Well, it's time to sum up. This picture turned out to be a very unfortunate fault of that, of course, a poorly worked out scenario. Yes, it has the basic idea of how important it is to look at your reflection in time to understand that it is better to be a responsible father than a mediocre creator, but this idea is lost in the endless useless scenes, the illogical actions of heroes and the product placement that constantly appears in the frame. This film is not required to be viewed by anyone. Even fans of creativity Konstantin Khabensky, I would not advise this film. It is a pity that Constantine feels in these projects his talent worth more.