[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app

mcgriswald

Joined Nov 2005
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.

Badges3

To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Explore badges

Ratings440

mcgriswald's rating
Father Ted
8.68
Father Ted
Un fauteuil pour deux
7.58
Un fauteuil pour deux
Un prince à New York 2
5.37
Un prince à New York 2
Vengeance
6.86
Vengeance
Once Upon a Time in... Hollywood
7.610
Once Upon a Time in... Hollywood
La Momie
7.16
La Momie
Jumanji
7.18
Jumanji
Date limite
6.56
Date limite
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
7.58
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
Lincoln
7.310
Lincoln
Duo à trois
7.09
Duo à trois
Big
7.38
Big
La Folle Journée de Ferris Bueller
7.89
La Folle Journée de Ferris Bueller
Inglourious Basterds
8.49
Inglourious Basterds
Willy Wonka au pays enchanté
7.88
Willy Wonka au pays enchanté
35 heures, c'est déjà trop
7.68
35 heures, c'est déjà trop
Bad Santa
7.08
Bad Santa
Pearl Harbor
6.35
Pearl Harbor
La castagne
7.28
La castagne
Les Indians
7.28
Les Indians
Troie
7.36
Troie
Minority Report
7.68
Minority Report
Les fumistes
6.68
Les fumistes
True Grit
7.68
True Grit
Master and Commander : De l'autre côté du monde
7.58
Master and Commander : De l'autre côté du monde

Reviews36

mcgriswald's rating
The Last of Us

The Last of Us

8.5
8
  • Jan 15, 2023
  • Purists should be pleased

    Resident Evil

    Resident Evil

    4.2
    8
  • Jul 16, 2022
  • Enjoyable backstory

    Well, the trolls got here before I did, as well as many folks who aren't paid or biased. This isn't Shakespeare, but it is a very coherent script with young capable actors playing the lead roles.

    Maybe because these girls don't look like Milla it disappoints a certain fan profile, but the hate on this series is pathetic. Simply put, this is an engaging story for anyone who followed the game, movie series or other media on RE.

    I can't imagine that the average sci fi/horror fan won't enjoy this.
    Papillon

    Papillon

    7.2
    7
  • Feb 20, 2019
  • Not bad, but why?

    I've always enjoyed watching the two actors who are the principal characters, I first saw Rami Malek in HBO's miniseries "The Pacific", in a pretty creepy role, and Charlie Hunnam in SOA, and I've liked them in their subsequent roles. In this version of Papillon, their performances and particularly the performances of the supporting cast is very good, but the original was a full blown Hollywood epic with two of the biggest stars of their era. Plus, unlike other remakes that bring a less censored version, the 1974 version pulled no punches when it came to gore and suffering, so there was little to add in that respect.

    So where was it lacking? For starters, the original had a much more sweaty feel to it-the lighting and cinematography always imparted a sense of decay. Everything seemed to be rotting and falling apart, including the people. That whole feel carries over to the solitary confinement scene, and McQueen's fetid hellhole seems dry and sterile and even Hunnam's reputed weight loss just doesn't convey McQueen's abject suffering.

    This movie is worth watching, but if you have a choice, go with the original.
    See all reviews

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.