Alyoshevna
Joined Nov 2005
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews3
Alyoshevna's rating
I won't repeat what others have said. My short take: It's one of the best action films and one of the best ensemble films ever made.
What I noticed on first viewing was how quiet it is. Many scenes take place without dialog or score, merely background noises like wind, feet crunching gravel, and the like. Some of the tensest scenes are made more so by our hearing only what the characters would hear. For example, early on in the film, the lead characters undergo a storm at sea and approach a dangerous narrows, and until the scene's climax, all we hear are howling wind, driving rain, and slamming waves.
A musical score tells viewers how they are supposed to feel and often telegraphs shifts in plot or mood. As used in this film, the absence of music heightens the drama and makes the action more immediate. What score there is is thus more effective, earning its composer an Academy Award.
What I noticed on first viewing was how quiet it is. Many scenes take place without dialog or score, merely background noises like wind, feet crunching gravel, and the like. Some of the tensest scenes are made more so by our hearing only what the characters would hear. For example, early on in the film, the lead characters undergo a storm at sea and approach a dangerous narrows, and until the scene's climax, all we hear are howling wind, driving rain, and slamming waves.
A musical score tells viewers how they are supposed to feel and often telegraphs shifts in plot or mood. As used in this film, the absence of music heightens the drama and makes the action more immediate. What score there is is thus more effective, earning its composer an Academy Award.
There is much I could say in praise of this movie, but I won't repeat what others have already said.
One of its best features, for viewers of all ages, is that it doesn't condescend to children. Charming as it was, SHREK -- from the same director -- did not expect children to handle much beyond a few familiar fairy-tale staples. THE LION, THE WITCH AND THE WARDROBE immerses them in a world wholly different from anything an American child knows: WWII England; the clothes, settings, and language of the place and time; Turkish delight, centaurs, even the "wardrobe" (which today would be called an armoire) and its mothballs. Many filmmakers wouldn't have touched this tale unless they could transpose it into contemporary America and either change or explain its alien elements. They wouldn't trust children to "get it."
But, to children, all the world is new. They are ready, nay, delighted to enter into a wondrous, magical world and take it on its own terms. What they don't understand doesn't matter. What matters is wonder. The creators of this film trust their audience. The result is more thrilling than any dumb-downed, words-of-one-syllable version would have been.
And the film is beautifully imagined. Most of us probably don't appreciate what it takes to adapt such a richly envisioned world to film: what to cut out and how to fill in what the author didn't describe. This movie succeeds remarkably. Its Narnia is true to C.S. Lewis and should be equally enthralling to viewers who have never heard of either.
If the idea of cheetahs, minotaurs, children in medieval armor, and other unlikely creatures rushing together into high-stakes battle intrigues you -- if you've never grown too old for wonder -- this movie is for you.
One of its best features, for viewers of all ages, is that it doesn't condescend to children. Charming as it was, SHREK -- from the same director -- did not expect children to handle much beyond a few familiar fairy-tale staples. THE LION, THE WITCH AND THE WARDROBE immerses them in a world wholly different from anything an American child knows: WWII England; the clothes, settings, and language of the place and time; Turkish delight, centaurs, even the "wardrobe" (which today would be called an armoire) and its mothballs. Many filmmakers wouldn't have touched this tale unless they could transpose it into contemporary America and either change or explain its alien elements. They wouldn't trust children to "get it."
But, to children, all the world is new. They are ready, nay, delighted to enter into a wondrous, magical world and take it on its own terms. What they don't understand doesn't matter. What matters is wonder. The creators of this film trust their audience. The result is more thrilling than any dumb-downed, words-of-one-syllable version would have been.
And the film is beautifully imagined. Most of us probably don't appreciate what it takes to adapt such a richly envisioned world to film: what to cut out and how to fill in what the author didn't describe. This movie succeeds remarkably. Its Narnia is true to C.S. Lewis and should be equally enthralling to viewers who have never heard of either.
If the idea of cheetahs, minotaurs, children in medieval armor, and other unlikely creatures rushing together into high-stakes battle intrigues you -- if you've never grown too old for wonder -- this movie is for you.